U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser (D) Joe Neguse (D) Michael Bennet
50% 50% 50%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) Brian Mason

60%↑

30%↑

20%↓

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%↑

30%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 13, 2025 10:52 AM UTC

Jeff Hurd Gives Very Bad Answers To Tele Town Hall Audience

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
That was then. This is DOGE.

We wrote yesterday about freshman GOP Rep. Jeff “Bread Sandwich” Hurd’s switch from in-person meetings with constituents to telephone town halls, following an incident last month in which Hurd’s Southwest regional staffer fled the scene of a library town hall after blanching at the size of the gathered crowd. On Tuesday evening, Rep. Hurd conducted a telephone town hall with constituents that the Grand Junction Sentinel reported on yesterday–and in Hurd’s answers to hard questions about impending cuts to Medicaid and federal mass layoffs, we can see why Republican leadership is telling their vulnerable members to avoid public interactions of any kind including via phone.

Of all the subjects Hurd addressed, the closest Hurd came to outright criticizing the Trump administration came in response to a question about Ukraine:

“In my view, pausing military aid to Ukraine weakens our hand, it emboldens Russia and it invites greater danger down the road from countries like China who are watching what’s happening here,” Hurd said. “In my view, it’s important that we do not align ourselves with Russia. I think Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was an unprovoked act of war, I believe Vladimir Putin is a dictator and that Russia and Putin are indisputably adversaries of America. It is dishonorable and wrong not to stand up against the tyranny of Putin.”

From that relatively strong moment, though, things went downhill as Hurd tried to minimize the damage being done from the mass layoff of federal workers:

[Hurd] said he’s “in communication with the White House, local leadership, the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture” to ensure that the cuts made to those services remove bloat without removing the people who matter most. He said he wants to protect public lands and ensure they’re available for future generations.

“It’s not the land managers on the ground in western and southern Colorado who should be cut … It should be the bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., that are seeing their ranks trimmed,” Hurd said [Pols emphasis] before elaborating on legislation he’s introduced to bring back fired staffers.

Going with the Hurd.

This was, to put it mildly, a terrible answer for residents of CO-03 who have seen with their own eyes the effects of layoffs of locally-based federal employees–and not the “bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.” everybody loves to hate, but the junior probationary workers who are actually losing their jobs in Colorado. Hurd’s legislation to preserve some of the benefits of seniority for fired workers who are later rehired is an acknowledgement that some of these terminations are wrong, but Hurd can’t admit that openly without risking the wrath of the ever-vigilant Trump media machine.

And when the subject turned to Medicaid, which thousands of residents of Rep. Hurd’s district depend on, Hurd’s answers got even worse:

In February, Hurd voted for a budget restructuring bill that tasks the government with cutting $2 trillion in costs over the next decade — and tasks the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which handles Medicaid policy, with finding $880 billion in cuts.

Hurd was asked if he supports any cuts to Medicaid and Medicare. He said that he’s committed to protecting Medicaid for those who need it most — “the working poor, mothers, pregnant women, children” — but he also thinks Medicaid dollars can be used more effectively, saying that expansion of the Affordable Care Act caused Medicaid spending to “explode.”

On the campaign trail last year, Hurd promised to “expand healthcare access for rural Colorado” (image above right). But in office, Hurd voted for a budget resolution that will require massive cuts to Medicaid resulting in an estimated 58,000 residents of Hurd’s district losing their Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage. That huge reduction in coverage is expected to strain rural hospitals and other care providers to and perhaps past their financial breaking point.

There’s no sugar coating it. Hurd’s first big vote in Congress was to break his campaign promise to “expand healthcare access for rural Colorado.”

“I know it’s very important to the 3rd Congressional District, since I believe about 30% of my constituents receive some sort of Medicaid assistance.”

Just like with Hurd’s fellow freshman Rep. Gabe Evans, the vote in favor of the GOP’s budget resolution calling for historic cuts to the nation’s social safety nets was a watershed moment that renders all of these platitudes about “expanding healthcare access” and “protecting Medicaid for those who need it most” 100% false. It doesn’t matter how many times Hurd and Evans say they want to “protect Medicaid,” their vote in favor of massive cuts to Medicaid is all that matters.

At a moment when rural Colorado needed the better leadership they were promised, Jeff Hurd wasn’t.

Comments

6 thoughts on “Jeff Hurd Gives Very Bad Answers To Tele Town Hall Audience

  1. Curious to read his sense of Medicaid … "protecting Medicaid for those who need it most — “the working poor, mothers, pregnant women, children”"

    Sorta overlooks the 60% and more of elderly reliant on Medicaid for residential care.

  2. JEFF HURD has been invited to ALAMOSA's SOCIETY HALL SATURDAY 2 pm.  His office says they are engaging him about attending.  Its part of the COMMON GROUND PEOPLES COLLECTIVE lead by CAMRYN BRICKER and this will be fun because while Costilla is mostly dem, Alamosa is leaning more and more right.  JEFF was highly encouraged to attend and rep CD3 since we've had 0 help in 4 years from BOOBERT. 

    https://www.facebook.com/societyhall/

    400 Ross Ave Alamosa, CO, United States, Colorado 81101

    49% of the San Luis Valley is on Medicaid.  

     

     

    1. Hurd didn't show. Shame since it was well attended maxing out Fire Marshall limit of the venue. 
      Polite, except for me who was locked out by a board member of venue when it reached limit before start time. 
       

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

158 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols