U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser (D) Joe Neguse (D) Michael Bennet
50% 50% 50%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) Brian Mason

60%↑

30%↑

20%↓

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%↑

30%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 26, 2025 11:35 AM UTC

House Budget Vote that Guts Medicaid Also Likely Ends Career of Rep. Gabe Evans

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Late on Tuesday evening, the House of Representatives narrowly approved a budget proposal that would drastically cut critical services, such as Medicaid, in order to pay for President Trump’s promised tax cuts for the rich.

As The Washington Post reports:

House Republicans narrowly approved a framework Tuesday for President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda, setting off a sprint with the Senate to reshape the tax code, implement strict new immigration policy, drill for new energy resources and spend billions on national defense.

The bill, which passed 217-215, would allow Congress’s GOP majorities to bypass a Democratic Senate filibuster through what’s known as the budget reconciliation process, but Republicans still face significant challenges before they can pass what Trump has taken to calling his “big, beautiful bill.” The House and Senate must agree on competing approaches, even though both chambers have now passed their own versions of the legislation.

All Republicans in Colorado’s congressional delegation (Reps. Jeff Hurd, Lauren Boebert, Gabe Evans, and Jeff Crank) voted in favor of the budget resolution, with all Democrats casting a “NO” vote. Congresswoman Brittany Pettersen (D-Jefferson County) flew to Washington D.C. with her newborn son just to make sure she could cast a vote in opposition to a plan that will likely decimate Medicaid funding that supports 1.3 million Coloradans.

 

As 9News explains, Tuesday’s vote is particularly frightening for residents in two Congressional districts represented by Republicans:

If Republicans cut Medicaid, the two congressional districts that stand to lose the most in Colorado are represented by those Republicans: Gabe Evans and Jeff Hurd.

As freshmen Congressmen Evans and Hurd got to know their districts, one thing they surely got to know is how many of their constituents rely on Medicaid for health coverage.

According to the Congressional District Health Dashboard from NYU Langone Health, nearly 30% of Hurd’s constituents on the Western Slope and in southern Colorado are on Medicaid, the most of any congressional district in the state.

Evans’ district, from Denver’s northern suburbs to Weld County, has 25% of the population on Medicaid, the second most.

Hurd represents a district in CO-03 that is much more favorable for Republicans, but he’s still going to have to explain this vote if he hopes to be re-elected in 2026. Evans is in a much different situation as one of the most vulnerable GOP incumbents in 2026. As we noted earlier this week, Evans doesn’t seem to be particularly conflicted about his responsibilities to his district in Colorado versus his blood oath to House Speaker Mike Johnson and President Trump…nevermind that 1 in 5 residents of CO-08 rely on Medicaid/CHIP funding — including 1 in 3 children in the district.

Evans tried to justify his terrible vote with a goofy walk-and-talk video posted to social media channels that was immediately debunked by Caitlyn Kim of Colorado Public Radio.

 

Republican leadership is well aware of the political peril that faces members running in tough districts amid all of these cuts; as NBC News reports, GOP leaders are urging members to stop holding town hall meetings altogether because of the blowback they are already receiving. Evans hasn’t even bothered to try to hold a town hall meeting of his own, so there won’t be anything to cancel in CO-08.

Evans and his staff seem to think that posting vacuous videos online will insulate him in 2026 from the wrath of voters whose lives will be upended should House Republicans succeed in cutting off funding for health care and food/nutrition programs for children. But what Evans is really doing is demonstrating that he is nothing more than a rubber stamp for a Republican agenda that seems utterly indifferent to the needs of everyday Americans. Evans hasn’t even been in Congress for two months, and he’s already handing Democrats everything they need to defeat him in 2026.

Gabe Evans just voted to take healthcare away from ONE-THIRD of all children in his congressional district and more than 126,000 CO-08 residents in total. Nothing else he says or does in the next 21 months will wipe that ledger clean.

Comments

7 thoughts on “House Budget Vote that Guts Medicaid Also Likely Ends Career of Rep. Gabe Evans

  1. FAFO for all those folks on Medicaid in CD 8 that voted for Gabe. What were you thinking?

    Hurd was probably wary of any extremists to his right that would have primaried him if he voted against the bill.

    Not exactly profiles in courage.

    1. "profiles in courage…." All three new R congressmen were already on the "Wall of Shame" of the RinoWatch website before they even were sworn in.

  2. Apparently Evans is the closest US Representative to me that needs to be persuaded (I'm represented by Jason Crow who is doing an excellent job).

    How do I go about persuading Evans? Should I put on body armor and barge into his office in Northglenn like a "peaceful January 6 tourist"? Should I send vague, anonymous threats to his family? What is an acceptable and effective way to persuade a Republican in Trump's Republican Party?

  3. Since the Republican Congress-Critters are not doing town-halls or constituent outreach…

    I'm assuming that Trump & Republican policies will be so unpopular that we'll see a 10-15 pt swing toward the D's in the 2026 election. It's not too early for the Democratic candidates for CO-03 and CO-05 start doing their own town halls. Name and face recognition, will win the day.

  4. Gabe is stupid and sycophantic, of course, but hey, we're living in a trash-rises-to-the-top nation where stupidity is increasing more widespread. Eulogizing shitboy's career in federal government might be a touch premature. 🙂

  5. House Republicans passed a resolution for the 

    (4) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE . The Committee on Energy and Commerce shall submit changes in laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the deficit by not less than $880,000,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2025 through 2034.

    There is some question if the Senate Republicans are willing to go along with the Reconciliation resolution — but assume at least 50 decide they will. 

    Newsweek said

    If the [House] committee takes its cuts from everything that is not health care, reducing this spending to $0, it would still be more than $600 billion short, according to analysis by The New York Times.

    So, where to get the $88 billion per year in cuts?  KFF says current Republican proposals

    federal Medicaid funding ($584 billion in 2024, see Appendix Table 1) is at significant risk under Republican proposals to reduce federal spending by nearly one third over ten years. …

    Medicare provides health insurance coverage to nearly 68 million older adults and younger people with long-term disabilities and accounted for just over half (52% or $839 billion) of mandatory spending on federal health programs and services in FY 2024….these specific proposals could yield around $500 billion in 10-year savings, and would have the greatest impact on hospitals,  

    So, with simple estimates, $88 billion will come out of $1,423 million … a bit over 6% overall.  Not a shutdown — but there is no way Republicans will keep the Trump "commitment" to not touch Medicare or Medicaid.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

142 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols