The Denver Post’s Nick Coltrain reports this morning on the resolution to a human resources problem at the Colorado Capitol created by now-former Democratic state Sen. Sonya Jaquez Lewis, who was facing an ethics investigation over misuse and general mistreatment of her state-funded legislative staff:
Jaquez Lewis, a Longmont Democrat, posted the announcement on her official Facebook page about 5:45 a.m. after notifying the top Senate leader Monday night. The resignation is effective immediately. As the reason for her resignation, she cited an opportunity to serve with a regional not-for-profit that develops women and LGBTQ+ people as leaders. Her announcement did not mention the ethics investigation.
Serving as an elected official “has been the honor of a lifetime,” Jaquez Lewis wrote. “I have been in the General Assembly for 7 years. During that time, I have served my constituents with pride and productivity. I have passed an enormous amount of legislation and policy that hopefully benefits every citizen of Colorado and some have become national benchmarks.”
The ethics committee was set to decide this week if allegations against her were credible enough to warrant a formal investigation into any ethics violation. That work was halted by the resignation — but also rocked by the new claim that Jaquez Lewis faked a letter of support…
The allegations against Jaquez Lewis about her treatment of staff had been compounding long before her resignation today, but these apparently fabricated letters of support appear to have tipped the situation into untenable territory. Even without that clearly disqualifying offense, Jaquez Lewis was already marginalized, having lost her staff and committee assignments after leadership repeatedly tried to intervene last year.
While no one should be defending Jaquez Lewis’ treatment of her staff, the response by Democratic leadership to the complaints about her behavior marks another significant contrast in the way the two caucuses manage the inevitable occasional problem member. The action taken by Senate leadership against Jaquez Lewis compares favorably to the state of general chaos that prevails on the other side of the aisle in the House, with Republicans like Rep. Brandi Bradley raging their way through standards of decency like bulls in a china shop.
The only thing we can add is that, the occasional no-show job beneficiary notwithstanding, legislative aides are hardworking, underpaid, and essential to the operation of the Colorado General Assembly. They should never be taken for granted, used for personal benefit, or otherwise mistreated by lawmakers lucky enough to have them at taxpayer expense.
Democratic leaders thankfully agree.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Early Worm
IN: High-Profile ICE Arrest Could Backfire On Trump Administration
BY: harrydoby
IN: High-Profile ICE Arrest Could Backfire On Trump Administration
BY: spaceman2021
IN: As Few Words As Possible About The Racist Jagoff Coming To Junction
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Rep. Joe Neguse Still The Hardest Working Dem In D.C.
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Rep. Joe Neguse Still The Hardest Working Dem In D.C.
BY: Phoenix Rising
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
As my Mom used to say, sometimes the trash takes itself out!
And….another Senate seat to be determined by a small vacancy committee, I believe the 3rd this year out of 35 total seats.
"small" vacancy committee being a relative term.
NCSL points out
Colorado replaced Senator Hanson via a vacancy committee of 107 voting members. Larger than a board of county commissioners, the governor, or a select group of legislators. Larger than the whole of both chambers of the legislature.
Special elections take time … In the case of Sen. Sonya Jaquez Lewis, the seat would be vacant until after this year's legislative session. And money … Administration of elections would mean preparing and mailing ballots to every registered voter and paying the costs of collecting, counting, and certifying the election. Depending on the approach, there could be both a primary and general in the special election.
If you don't like district committee selection, what system do you want instead? .
I'm really more displeased with the 3 (and maybe counting) out of 35 senators being seated by vacancy committee than I am about the process. Constituents of a district need representation as soon as reasonably possible, and a vacancy committee goes fast plus doesn't cost much, if anything. I don't necessarily want to replace vacancy committees.
But given the district has 115,000-ish registered voters, I'm sticking with calling it a "small" vacancy committee even if they hit something like 107 voters (which they might).
Getting rid of Lewis is a big plus, regardless of the nature of selecting her replacement.
Agreed, with the caveat that we don't know if the 50-ish voters it will take for a majority are really going to elect someone better qualified. I do feel mostly confident that they won't elect someone mired in scandal.
It'd be hard to find someone less qualified than she in her current circumstances.
Judge Ana Reyes burns Government lawyer who was trying to defend Trump's anti-trans in the military executive order.
Just read the whole thing at WaPo.
…
The trash has indeed taken itself out, Jaquez-Lewis has been problematic since she was elected to the House. The fact that she submitted 5 letters of support that were probably all fabricated (we know at least one was for certain) tells you everything you need to know about her. One less toxic person in the legislature.