The Denver Catholic Archdiocese is wading into the issue of Colorado’s new Universal Preschool program with a disgusting and ridiculous lawsuit, proving once again that for the Archdiocese, there is never a wrong time to do the wrong thing.
As Elizabeth Hernandez reports for The Denver Post:
The Denver Catholic Archdiocese along with two of its parishes is suing the state alleging their First Amendment rights are violated because their desire to exclude LGBTQ parents, staff and kids from Archdiocesan preschools keeps them from participating in Colorado’s new universal preschool program.
The program is intended to provide every child 15 hours per week of state-funded preschool in the year before they are eligible for kindergarten. To be eligible, though, schools must meet the state’s non-discrimination requirements.
There are other issues associated with the rollout of Gov. Jared Polis‘ signature proposal to provide free state-funded preschool for Colorado families, but those arguments are significantly more complicated (including a recently-filed lawsuit by a handful of school districts). This complaint from the Denver Archdiocese is much more straightforward: They want to be allowed to discriminate against certain Colorado families AND still be allowed to collect checks from the State of Colorado for providing preschool services.
Let’s break out a few more sections of the Post story separately:
The Denver Archdiocese said in the suit they do not believe adhering to their religious beliefs against accepting LGBTQ people qualifies as discrimination. The Denver Post published written guidance last year issued by the Denver Archdiocese to its Catholic schools on the handling of LGBTQ issues, including telling administrators not to enroll or re-enroll transgender or gender non-conforming students and explaining that gay parents should be treated differently than heterosexual couples…
The Denver Archdiocese doesn’t think THEIR kind of discrimination is REALLY discrimination? They literally tell staff that gay parents should be treated differently than heterosexual couples.
What’s their real argument here? It’s only gay people!
We’re not going to do the “dictionary definition of discrimination” thing, because that would insult the intelligence of anyone reading this. Suffice it to say that you are discriminating if you are intentionally excluding a particular group of people based on specific characteristics. If you’re trying to argue about the definition of the word “discrimination,” then you’ve already lost.
The lawsuit said enrolling children with gay parents into an Archdiocesan school “is likely to lead to intractable conflicts” because a “Catholic school cannot treat a same-sex couple as a family equivalent to the natural family without compromising its mission and Catholic identity.”
We can’t disagree here — nor do we understand why a same-sex couple would even want to enroll their children in a Catholic preschool — but that’s really not the point of the Archdiocese complaint.
The lawsuit is seeking a jury trial and for the state to reverse its decision and allow the Denver Archdiocese to participate in the universal preschool program while giving them the ability to exclude LGBTQ students, staff and parents from their schools.
[mantra-pullquote align=”right” textalign=”left” width=”60%”]“When you are publicly funded, you have to agree with the basic values: We don’t discriminate…When we publicly support preschool, that means preschool for everybody, every kid.”
— Governor Jared Polis (KDVR, 8/17/23)[/mantra-pullquote]
There it is.
Again, the point here is that the Archdiocese wants to be treated financially like any other preschool program despite the fact that it is very different because of its transparent discrimination policies. Nobody is saying that the Archdiocese can’t discriminate against certain groups of people based on their religious views, although that’s pretty gross in and of itself. The State of Colorado is just saying, We’re not going to give you money for preschool if you’re going to discriminate about who gets to attend your school.
For his part, Gov. Polis has a very simple response. From Fox 31 Denver:
“I think our focus has always been: the kids first, of course no discrimination, serve everybody if you want to take public funds, and it’s great to see so many preschoolers going back to school across the state,” Polis said Thursday…
…For Polis, the issue is simple: Do not discriminate, and you can have access to state dollars.
“I’m not commenting on specific lawsuits, but obviously, if you run a preschool that doesn’t receive state money, you can run it the way you want,” Polis said.
Nick Reaves, an attorney representing the Archdiocese, has his own asinine logic:
“Families have to choose between receiving a Catholic education and sending their kids to a Catholic school or getting a free preschool education at a secular school. And for parents who have worked hard and sacrificed to send their kids to a Catholic school, it’s not fair that Colorado is saying, ‘If you pull your kids out and go to any secular, private preschool, we’ll give you this tuition for preschool.’”
This is completely absurd. Colorado’s Universal Preschool program was not created to convince parents to move their kids out of a Catholic preschool. The purpose of the program is to give all Colorado kids — even the ones with same-sex parents — access to preschool programs.
This argument is, of course, part of broader discussion about school voucher programs, whose proponents inevitably come across the same problem. Not only do they think it should be totally fair to discriminate against an entire class of people…they want taxpayer money to help them advance their biases. This doesn’t make much sense, as Polis said to KDVR:
“If folks want to remain private and omit certain parents, they can do that but they won’t be funded for universal preschool by the state.”
It’s really that simple. If you want to be a bigoted asshat, that’s your decision — but the rest of Colorado shouldn’t have to help you.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Farmer Warns Trump Policies Could Have Lasting Negative Effects on Crop Growers
BY: kwtree
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JeffcoDemo
IN: Colorado Farmer Warns Trump Policies Could Have Lasting Negative Effects on Crop Growers
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Why Doesn’t Anyone Want to Host Our Nazi Keynote Speaker?
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Since the current SCOTUS majority has tipped the First Amendment balance far to the side of the Free Exercise Clause, while gutting the Establishment Clause, this lawsuit is zero surprise, and, sadly, could likely succeed. It is a sad commentary that religion–well, at least christianity–is again being given a preferred status in our society. Thus, the Catholic church–purveyors of death and destruction for centuries–believes it should have the right to discriminate yet still be fully entitled to government funding. Yet, here we are.
And I'd wager that it isn't everyone's Free Exercise Clause rights. I would imagine that some of the guys being held in Gitmo would like to act on their sincerely held beliefs as to what the Quran tells them to do to infidels.
I'm also going to guess that Wiccans, Pagans, and Satan Worshippers would not be looked up kindly by Justices Thomas and Alito and their friends in the Opus Dei Club.
The fact that the still-dead Justice Scalia was most likely a believer in creationism and a 6,000 year-old world just shows how distorted SCOTUS's thinking is from rational thought. I have no time for judges who deny science. And yet, we have put way too many on the highest court and the lower federal courts, which explains a lot of the recent Fifth Circuit decision on the FDA and the general gobsmacking stupidity of Dobbs. Hard to respect a judiciary populated with myth-taken clods.
There were two good Letters to the Editor published in today’s Denver Post protesting the Denver Archdiocese’s actions.
The current archbishop has much hate in his heart and mind.
Would love to see a madrassa apply to be in this program. One could then watch a lot of far right wing heads figuratively exploding.
100% this!
I think there could well be a new pre-school affiliated with The International Church of Cannabis – “a religious organization in Denver that uses cannabis as a sacrament.”
You know, I get churches claiming the right to discriminate in hiring. I don't necessarily agree with it, but I get it.
Where these folks are losing me is discriminating against children of same-sex parents…especially when they are not discriminating against children of divorced parents…or single parents.
It's in the Bible: "The sins of the fathers are visited on the sons"
Yeah … all that "sins of the father" stuff can be found "primarily in the books Exodus, Deuteronomy, and Numbers "
but Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.”
So let me get this straight — the Denver Catholic Archdiocese wants to take public funds from Jews, Muslims, Buddists, Protestants, Agnostics, Atheists (and I'm missing dozens of other value and belief systems) to teach children to become narrow-minded bigots?
That takes some really shriveled cojones!
"really shriveled cojones"
What do you think you will find if you look underneath those dresses those guys wear?
And it’s not like the Catholic archdiocese lacks money to fund preschools. The AP reports :
Selling a few real estate investments could fund many full day preschools – the Catholic Church owns more land than McDonalds or Bill Gates’ heirs.
I’m an alumnus of Regis University, a liberal Jesuit Catholic institution. Unlike many of their more conservative brethren, Jesuits value scientific inquiry, intellectual rigor, tolerance and social justice. They also give back to the community and are less wealthy than other orders, having broken with the Catholic hierarchy early on in the matter of charging interest on loans.
There are many other “Social Justice” Catholics who have and continue to work for the greater good. Think Mother Teresa, the Berrigan brothers, and others, including Papa Frank himself. . It isn’t Catholic religion or values that are a reactionary force- it’s simple greed and lust for power, cloaked with piety and scripture.