U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 02, 2023 12:30 PM UTC

Buck Co-Sponsors Anti-Skynet Bill And We're Okay With That

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

A press release last week from Rep. Ken Buck’s office we didn’t want to escape without a mention–a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers that includes the famously Big Tech-averse Rep. Buck has introduced legislation to ensure the plot of the Terminator movie franchise never becomes reality.

Try as we might to scoff, after some consideration, it’s hard to see a problem with this:

Representatives Ken Buck (CO-04), Ted W. Lieu (CA-36), Don Beyer (VA-08) and Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today introduced the bipartisan and bicameral Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Act, legislation to safeguard the nuclear command and control process from any future change in policy that allows artificial intelligence (AI) to make nuclear launch decisions.

The Department of Defense’s 2022 Nuclear Posture Review states that current policy is to “maintain a human ‘in the loop’ for all actions critical to informing and executing decisions by the President to initiate and terminate nuclear weapon employment” in all cases. The Block Nuclear Launch by Autonomous AI Act would codify the Department’s existing policy by ensuring that no federal funds can be used for any launch of any nuclear weapon by an automated system without meaningful human control. Furthermore, the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, established by Congress through the FY19 National Defense Authorization Act, recommended in their final report that the U.S. clearly and publicly affirm its policy that only human beings can authorize employment of nuclear weapons. This bill follows through on their recommendation.

“While U.S. military use of AI can be appropriate for enhancing national security purposes, use of AI for deploying nuclear weapons without a human chain of command and control is reckless, dangerous, and should be prohibited,” said Representative Buck. “I am proud to co-sponsor this legislation to ensure that human beings, not machines, have the final say over the most critical and sensitive military decisions.”

Opinions differ on Rep. Buck’s suspicions about Big Tech controlling the world via your social media feeds, but if there’s anything James Cameron taught us since childhood it’s to never, ever let the machines take control of the nuclear weapons. It’s a rule right up there with don’t steam at full speed into an iceberg field and be nice to aliens with unobtainable resources you need–also important childhood lessons we learned from James Cameron. In fact, Buck sponsoring a bill to stop AI from getting control of the nukes could serve as the plot for a whole new Terminator sequel.

It’s not the most important issue Congress faces today, unless, you know, it is.

Only the future, or somebody visiting from the future (see: Terminator franchise) can say for sure.

Comments

6 thoughts on “Buck Co-Sponsors Anti-Skynet Bill And We’re Okay With That

  1. It's the battle between two nightmare scenarios: Wargames (1983) and Dr. Strangelove (1964). Cameron was just piggybacking on the former, although he did give us a clear sense of the consequences of automated nuclear war.

    To this day, however, the DoD fears being blamed for a rogue General Ripper far more than it does being blamed for faulty AI.

  2. I have to confess. I'm okay with this too. Terminators 2 and 3 scared the bejeeses out of me. I don't have any AI in my house at all. When visiting friends with an Alexa, I often ask it when AIs are going to take over the planet, and sometimes her answer is down-right ominous.

     

  3. Hopefully AI might possibly survive both the nuclear and climate holocausts and along with the cockroaches be able to build some kind of future on this planet?

  4. Let’s deal with truly pressing important issues first.

    Obviously AI can replace Jimmy Fallon, certainly Bill Maher, and probably Seth Meyers. (It already easily replaced that lump Corden years ago, in its first generation.)

    But, how’re we gonna’ manage without John Oliver? 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

40 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!