President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Anna Stout





CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Jerry Sonnenberg

(R) Richard Holtorf

(R) Heidi Ganahl

(R) Deborah Flora





CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Doug Lamborn*


CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen


CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Scott James




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 09, 2022 12:39 pm

Could An "Adjudicated Recount" Make a Difference in CO-03?

  • by: Colorado Pols
There are a lot of ways to screw up a bubble.

One of the more surprising outcomes of the 2022 election has opened the door to an unusual new recount request that could potentially have repercussions elsewhere.

As part of the massive “Bluenami” that drowned darn near every Republican in Colorado in 2022, Democrat Bob Marshall upset “incumbent” Republican Rep. Kurt Huffman in Douglas County (HD-43) by 405 votes (Huffman was appointed by a vacancy committee in June after Rep. Kevin Van Winkle was selected to fill a State Senate vacancy, so he wasn’t really a true “incumbent). In a district where 45,349 total ballots were cast, 405 votes is outside the margin for an automatic recount (triggered when the difference between the top two vote-getters is within 0.5% of the leading candidate’s vote total).

Huffman could pay for a traditional machine recount himself — Colorado doesn’t do hand-counts — though he’d be unlikely to find enough votes to change the outcome of the race; that process generally only adjusts vote totals by a smidge, as we saw with last summer’s recount in the Republican race for Secretary of State. Instead, Huffman is hoping a different request could alter his fortunes.

As the Colorado Secretary of State’s office explained on Thursday via press release:

The permissive recount was requested by candidate Huffman on December 5. The Secretary of State’s Office requested an estimate from Douglas County for the cost of the recount and provided it to candidate Huffman on December 6. The cost estimate provided to candidate Huffman was $738. Candidate Huffman submitted a $1,000 check to the Colorado Department of State on December 7. The recount order to Douglas County was sent on December 8. Any unused funds will be refunded to the candidate.

Per candidate Huffman’s request, the recount will be conducted via readjudication, meaning only ballots that required adjudication in the initial tabulation will be examined in the recount. This approach, which is specified in Election Rule 10.9.2, calls for the county’s bipartisan election judges to reexamine all of the ballots which required human adjudication during the initial tabulation of votes and recheck to ensure that those human adjudications were accurate. Candidate Huffman had the option under Election Rule 10.9.3 to request a recount by means of a re-scanning of all of the ballots, but he has elected to request, and pay for, a recount by means of readjudication.

Lauren Boebert’s “oh, s***” face.

In short, the process of “adjudication” is used to help determine a voter’s intent when a completed ballot is unclear. For example, if a voter filled out the wrong bubble, crossed it out, and then circled a different name, an election judge would examine said ballot in an attempt to determine what the voter meant to choose on a particular ballot question.

Colorado’s ballot tabulation machines flag ballots that appear to contain overvotes (more than one selection on a given question) or other markings (such as writing in the margins) that are then set aside for a bipartisan team of election judges to review.

In a “permissive recount” — what we are calling an “adjudicated recount” — all ballots flagged as containing overvotes or undervotes (when no mark is made on a particular question) are reviewed by a bipartisan team in order to ensure that there wasn’t a voter mark that might need to be re-interpreted.

Whew! Got it?

Now, because the race in HD-43 did not have a third-party candidate, it is unlikely that there were hundreds of misinterpreted ballots out of a total of 45,379 total ballots cast. Those odds are much different in a Congressional race, however.

In CO-03, where a mandatory recount is underway in the race between incumbent Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert and Democrat Adam Frisch, it is theoretically possible that an “adjudicated recount” could make more of a difference. Boebert entered the mandatory recount with a 550-vote advantage out of a total of 327,134 ballots cast. If 276 ballots out of that total were counted for Boebert when the voter intent was to select Frisch, the outcome of this race could be very different.

There is no indication that Boebert or Frisch are considering this question, and we really have no idea whether there could actually be enough of these mis-marked ballots to make a difference in CO-03. But this wasn’t a question we had even considered until Huffman filed his permissive recount request earlier this week.

The original mandatory recount in CO-03 must be completed by Tuesday, Dec. 13. The “permissive” or “adjudicated” recount in HD-43 is scheduled to be finalized by Thursday, Dec. 15.

Anyway, at some point the 2022 election will in fact end. We’re 99% sure of that.


9 thoughts on “Could An “Adjudicated Recount” Make a Difference in CO-03?

  1. “Anyway, at some point the 2022 election will in fact end. We’re 99% sure of that.”

    But is that 99.49% or less, or 99.51% or more. If the latter, does it call for an automatic reconsideration. If the former, can we get just an adjudicated decision? cheeky

    I am sorry to say that I am such an election geek, I knew all of that before reading Pols’ post. But good job explaining it to the uninitiated!

  2. Would not conducting the automatic recount in CD3 also flag all of the same votes that were questionable for review, accomplishing the same thing for those votes (except not targeting them specifically) as an adjudicated recount?

  3. Actually in a regular recount, for ballots that were adjudicated, only the duplicated ballot is  counted, not the original. Now that applies to ones where a bi-partisan team was able to determine a voter's intent. Those with true over and under votes (either voted for two or more candidates same race or no candidates for a race), would be recounted the same way they were counted the first time. So the over votes would be checked again to see if was sign of voter intent and the under votes would be checked again to see if there was just too light a mark (or made in wrong color) for the counter to see.

  4. 13th will be interesting but Adam Frisch is confident it won't change a thing. I would love to see the look on Booberts face if she's pitched out into the MAGA darkness like Kari Lake and others of the same ilk.  

    1. While it is lovely to think about, the biggest vote change I have ever seen in recounts was 8 votes. And that was in a pretty populous statewide election. I can't remember now if it was Minnesota or Wisconsin, but it was someplace in that part of the country.

      1. Dano, I guess it depends on how you are counting "vote change." The recent Colorado primary recount:

        Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters requested the recount and accused the election of being rigged after results showed her losing by a wide margin to former Jefferson County Clerk Pamela Anderson. 

        Peters gained 13 votes in the recount, as did Anderson. Mike O’Donnell, who narrowly got third in the race, gained 11 votes.

        “The recounts are complete and confirm once again that Colorado elections are safe and secure,” said Secretary of State Jena Griswold. 

        Peters lost the June Republican primary for secretary of state by 88,579 votes,


        1. I was referring net gain/loss. In the Peters/Anderson/O'Donnell race that would be net change of -2 votes for O'Donnell. (or you could say net change of +2 for both Peters and Anderson).

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

115 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!