CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
May 21, 2012 09:42 PM UTC
18 Comments
There’s an app-onent for that.
Tracy Kraft-Tharp is one of the strongest first-time candidates I’ve ever seen on either side of the aisle. If you’d like to flip the majority, I can’t think of a better place for a few bucks or a couple hours of your time to land.
…lives in that district.
Robert Ramirez voted as his constituents asked him to. Listen to the video and Ramirez says he has not committed and will vote his district.
http://www.citizenlink.com/201…
Once again, just because Colorado Pols says that all Republicans must act like Democrats doesn’t make it true. This issue is one of many. Voters must make a choice.
Your handlers didn’t answer your text right away with the party line?
Here’s a hint to pass on to them: If the accusation is “Ramirez can’t be trusted when he says he intends to vote a particular way,” the right way to address that accusation is not, “Well yeah, you’re right, but he says he had a reason!”
Text them back and let them know that those annoying liberals on Pols want to know why Ramirez didn’t poll his constituents before making a public statement, or why he didn’t make the public statement, “I will vote in accordance with the wishes of people who call and/or email me about this bill.”
Ramirez has not had the opportunity to cast a vote on civil unions.
I should have said that Ramirez would have voted as his constituents asked. He claims his constituents told him to oppose civil unions by 35-1.
I stand by my point.
He made nearly the exact same comment about constituent emails regarding the ASSET bill. I think that’s his fall-back line when asked something controversial. I live in his district and I don’t believe for one minute that opposition to civil unions outweighs support 35-1.
Perhaps the reason Rep. Ramirez never responds to my emails is because he only reads emails from supporters. The one out of 36 that disagrees with him must have some sort of misleading subject line that implies it’s from a supporter.
of those in his district opposed to gay rights is 35 fold greater than supporters, so they’re on the phone more.
In studies, it’s called selection bias.
So he got fewer calls from the people who already believed he had made the right decision.
If opponents are passionate and supporters are lackadaisical, the opponents should win, shouldn’t they? Why are supporters so unenthusiastic about this issue that supposedly enjoys 7000000% approval?
One man one vote.
For quoting a FOTF website.
When are you going to retract your false statement (see link in my sig line)?
The guy is just tone deaf; not just on the obvious hypocrisy here. But also because he thinks showing up to an extremist Focus on the Family rally and supporting Frank McNulty nuking dozens of bills is good politics in his district.