U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

60%↑

40%↑

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 22, 2022 11:49 PM UTC

Weekend Open Thread

  • 27 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Success is a great deodorant.”

–Elizabeth Taylor

Comments

27 thoughts on “Weekend Open Thread

  1. I think I could have been a significant asset to the Biden Administration in this role. Not saying I am a perfect fit, but pretty close. And because I sold my company for cash, it would be trivial for me to put all my assets in index funds.

    I reached out to those I knew but none of them had access to the right people. And I understand that there's no way any presidential administration can actually look at random incoming resumes – there's too many.

    But it's too bad because I would have done a good job (I think) and as it is, they're left with an empty position.

  2. Thought for the day – we focus on the legislation to inhibit voting by Democrats, the blatant gerrymandering, and the Republican bias of the Senate and Electoral College. All serious problems and all worth our opposition.

    But what we rarely pay attention to is that about half the country truly wants what the Republicans are selling. This is not a case of 20% of the country imposing their views on 80%. What we face is 45% of the country using every advantage to impose their will on 50% of the country.

    And if you add up people on the right and left who favor autocracy to impose their view of society, we might be close to 50% who will support overturning our democracy in furtherance of their aims.

    This is what makes things so bloody hard for those of us fighting the good fight.

    1. I disagree that half the country wants what the Republicans are selling.

      Firstly, 33% don't bother voting. Of those voting, it was D 51.3, R 46.8, and Other 1.8. Yes, the electoral college is unfair.

      Secondly, Republican support is high only in certain demographics: rural, white, christian. 

      Thirdly, the billionaires have bought and funded a huge propaganda machine, to the extent that within those rural, white and christian demographics you only hear Republican propaganda.

      Fourthly, the Republican Party is running a 24×7 weekly, 4×4 election cycle marketing campaign built around destroying the Democratic Brand and goosing Republican turnout. The Democratic Party is sitting around eating Ben & Jerry's with plastic spoons. 

    1. There was serious consideration given 14 years ago, but at the time no election system that passed certification by the state was capable of running any of the RC methods. When last I asked about 4 years ago that was still true. I don't know why. Further, I don't understand why Maine's Instant Runoff system is so painfully slow once you get past first preference – these are systems that are the forte of computer ballot counting.

      1. Solidarity with his female constituents? If he can’t walk a milein their shoes, he’ll drink a while in their ….underwear?

        🫣 as far as staff goes, it was probably disgruntled ex-staff who released those pics. I’d guesis that Cawthorne isn’t he easiest guy in the world to work for.

        or it could be that they knew they wouild be released elsewhere and decided to get out in front of the story.  

  3. Polis betrayed his elderly, poor and disabled constituents. He threatened to veto the rent-stabilization part of the mobile home residents bill of rights. 

    With lot rents tripling, low income residents are being forced out of their long time homes. But that’s not who Polis gives a shit about.

    Polis is  only listening to out of state investors, who own 70% of Colorado trailer parks. They are crying about how they might make only 20% profit instead of 50%. Actual infrastructure and amenity improvements, if documented, can still justify modest increases in lot rent under the proposed law, so the minority of locally owned parks can still make ends meet.

    Hate to say it, V, but you were right. I should have voted for Cary Kennedy. I don’t think she’d be doing this to Colordo’s neediest people right now.

     

    1. I wonder if she is considering running for Denver mayor.  Since she was the Denver CFO and Deputy Mayor, it's not like it would be much of a stretch. 

      I think she'd probably be the defacto frontrunner as well.

  4. Just Imagine if there was no Socialism. (Stolen from my FB feed)

    Socialism is taxpayer funds being used collectively to benefit society as a whole, despite income, contribution or ability.

    Medicare
    Social Security
    Public Schools
    Military/Defense
    Highways/Roads
    Public Libraries
    Fire Department
    Police
    Student Loans & Grants
    Farm Subsidies
    CIA & FBI
    Polio Vaccine
    EPA
    Museums
    Public Parks
    GI Bill
    Hoover Dam
    Bridges
    Free Lunch Program
    SNAP
    FDA
    Unemployment Insurance
    OSHA
    USDA
    National Weather Service
    CDC
    Sewer System
    Medicaid
    Jail/Prison System
    Court System
    Healthcare Workers
    Disability Insurance
    Town/State Run Beaches
    Snow Removal
    Public Street Lighting.

    … And More

    1. Maybe people are okay with the amount of “socialism” we already have without imbibing in more… It’s kind of like the difference between the normal drinker and the alcoholic. (If one is good and two is better, then all is best.)

      We’ve had some form of government-financed projects since the early 19th century when the debate was over “internal improvements” (i.e., roads and canals – infrastructure).

      But just because people like public schools (alongside private schools if parents choose to put their kids there) doesn’t mean we have to have Medicare-for-All-Whether-They-Like-It-Or-Not. (A public option added to the ACA is fine. People can go on to the wonderful governmental program or choose to go with the God-awful insurance company.)

       

      P.S. The left has a big branding problem with the word “socialism.” Look at those House seats in Florida which were lost in 2020 because the Dem incumbents were soiled with the runoff from the ranting of the Squad.

      Here’s a suggestion: come up with a new name instead of trying to sell “socialism” – an economic program for which most of the population in the US has never been receptive. Call it something new – like Investing in Infrastructure and in Human Resources.

      1. You are not paying attention to the Republican project.

        The billionaire-libertarian goal is to eliminate government, you know, make it smaller until you can drown it in the bathtub.

        They especially want to remove those socialist programs that benefit the undeserving poor people, like Social Security, child labor laws.

        Regarding medical care, our system is hugely dysfunctional and crazy. It's extraordinarily expensive, and designed to funnel money to monopoly interests like PHRMA. We need a much more socialist Health Care and Health Insurance system, designed around poeple's actual needs, not the profit centers.

    1. I saw. I  came to see if it had been posted yet. I’ll miss the old guy. He was somethin’ else; had an encyclopedic knowledge of city and state history. We always had a good time at his St. Paddy’s Day party. 

      1. I had the honor and pleasure of meeting him a few times over the last couple of decades.  He was also a tremendous supporter of our effort to preserve Park Hill Golf Course land to one day become a regional park as dense development has already begun to surround it. 

        I will be forever grateful for his vision, support and respect for the future of our city.

  5. Heather Cox-Richardson:

    The current Republican Party has two wings: one eager to get rid of any regulation of business, and one that wants to get rid of the civil rights protections that the Supreme Court and Congress began to put into place in the 1950s. Business regulation is actually quite popular in the U.S., so to build a political following, in the 1980s, leaders of the anti-regulation wing of the Republican Party promised racists and the religious right that they would stomp out the civil rights legislation that since the 1950s has tried to make all Americans equal before the law.

    But even this marriage has not been enough to win elections, since most Americans like business regulation and the protection of things like the right to use birth control. So, to put its vision into place, the Republican Party has now abandoned democracy. Its leaders have concluded that any Democratic victory is illegitimate, even if voters have clearly chosen a Democrat, as they did with Biden in 2020, by more than 7 million votes.

    1. Ya suppose she thinks tanks with internal combustion engines fueled by wonderful petroleum products never have to pause to refuel?  Did she miss stories of Russian tanks abandoned because they ran out of fuel?

      If ignorance is bliss, she's got a supply that will last well past the November election.

      1. The one that bothers me is that the M1 runs on jet aviation fuel and gets 3 gallons per mile…. Yes, 3gpm. How can you run a war like that?

        Not an expert, but I've been doing some reading regarding the demise (or not) of the tank due to javelins, MANPADS, drones and loitering munitions.

        The tank is actually the only way to project force on the battlefield while protecting infantry. To survive, tanks require you to control the airspace, meaning you have dominance with drones, helicopters and planes. Modern war requires coordinated air, armor and battle groups. The Russians are lacking in this regard, and they have lost a lot of planes and helicopters. This explains why they are afraid to contest Ukraine's airspace, and that's one reason for their heavy tank losses.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

148 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols