As the Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel reports:
The unanimous vote for House Bill 1001 in the Legal Services Committee was a stark contrast to two years ago, when a bill to do away with seniority-based job protections for teachers led to a civil war within the Democratic Party.
The bill pitted supporters of teachers unions against Democrats and Republicans who wanted to make it easier to fire ineffective teachers.
But after nearly two years of drafting rules for how to evaluate teachers, different factions appear to have agreed on a fair way to link teacher tenure to student performance.
“It truly is one of those times that everybody is aligned around a common purpose on behalf of our children,” said Diana Sirko, deputy commissioner of the Colorado Department of Education.
We’ve noted several times how the former high drama over the passage of 2010’s Senate Bill 191 teacher tenure reforms, a battle that pitted traditional Democratic allies in education against many fellow Democrats, has shifted to real cooperation as the process moved from passage of the bill to implementation of the new rules. It’s become clearer as the process has moved along that some proponents of SB-191 really didn’t want the teachers to cooperate as they have, because for them, SB-191 was only a baby step toward a much more far-reaching agenda.
This matters because that radical agenda is lurking, and people on both sides of the fight over SB-191 need to understand the difference between that fight and fights yet to come. Because not all education reform is radicalism, and not all reformers are radicals. But some of what we’ll see very soon masked as “reform,” with “reformer” proponents, are indeed…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Farmer Warns Trump Policies Could Have Lasting Negative Effects on Crop Growers
BY: kwtree
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JeffcoDemo
IN: Colorado Farmer Warns Trump Policies Could Have Lasting Negative Effects on Crop Growers
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Why Doesn’t Anyone Want to Host Our Nazi Keynote Speaker?
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Major thank you to all who worked to craft this. Very well done!
But remember, says the mouthpiece of the Colorado left, this far and NO FARTHER!
It’s really transparent. It’s called “retrenchment.”
first part, . . . then there’s that thing at the end, . . . and, also, a whole bunch — ok, all of that — middle stuff too . . .
So, what was the question? . . .
You got the ‘bot there.
I’m saying that the teacher unions realized they were beaten on teacher tenure reform and caved. They did so so they could say they were cooperating and use that as an argument against further reforms. This is the definition of “retrenchment.”
I’m not saying it’s a bad idea, it probably isn’t. But it tells you who’s winning and who’s losing the debate.
is when an individual or group realizes that it is in their benefit to take a somewhat different position? Hmm, I thought that was just a part of a negotiation
signed — joker veteran
Not in the TP dictionary
I thought Brophy had some gravitas.
Man was I wrong