U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Michael Bennet
50%
50%
50%
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
December 07, 2011 05:33 PM UTC
15 Comments
I bet your newletters are going to get even weirder now. Can’t wait.
Sen. Kevin Lundberg is a far-right conservative.
Rep. Joe Miklosi is a far-left liberal.
Why does Miklosi get the kid gloves, yet we are told to laugh at Lundberg? What’s the difference?
It’s a rhetorical question about bias, you don’t have to answer it.
of “far-left liberal” bills and statements from Miklosi that are remotely comparable to the list Pols provided for Lundberg?
It’s a rhetorical question about your skewed view of the political spectrum, you don’t have to answer it.
every post from AGOP is rhetorical and skip them all.
But while we’re on the subject of far-right, doesn’t Coffman qualify? After all, isn’t he the only member of the Colorado delegation in the Tea Party caucus?
Those are rhetorical questions about Coffman’s radical far-right record, you don’t have to answer them.
No, Coffman is not the only member of the Tea Party Caucus. Lamborn also belongs.
Great company for Coffman.
you should refer to it as Michele Bachmann’s Tea Party Caucus. Just to remove any doubt.
To answer your question, “stupid” is always funnier than “intelligent.”
You’re funny.
that was good
if you are from Salem, MA, circa 1692.
isn’t that doing a disservice to Scott “”I’m not saying (homosexuality) is the only sin that is out there. Obviously we have sin – we have murder, we have, we have all sorts of sin, we have adultery, and we don’t make laws making those legal, and we would never think to make murder legal.”” Renfroe?
When he held a press conference to say passing anti-discrimination law SB200 would cause the bible to be banned: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=68542
Please Kevin, please – speaking for the people in CD2, we so want you to run!
I just don’t think Jared Polis has lived a good enough life to earn Kevin Lundberg as a primary opponent.
For all the Tea Party talk in local papers about the US being a “representative republic,” Kevin Lundberg has been THE WORST “representative” I’ve ever had, and I spent 6 years in Tancredo’s CD6.
The guy ignores constituent requests and embodies the philosophy that the “government that governs least, governs best,” by doing NOTHING but spew ideologically charged barbs at the Capitol and local meetings.
To wit, at a debate in 2010 Lundberg literally claimed that the only reason women “had” to work in America was an unfair tax code, and that if we could fix the tax code, women could go back to what they prefer to do, stay at home. That’s not a far-right conservative, that’s downright reactionary!
IF that’s the kind of “clear choice” Lundberg proposes to offer, I wish him luck with the 50% of his potential constituents who are hard working women, proud to support their families, and, for that matter, the other 50% who are glad to have women like that in their lives in these tough economic times.
Assuming Lundberg stays in the race, it won’t just be laughter! “Schadenfreude,” or joy at another’s misfortune, will the be the only word I know to describe it.