CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 27, 2011 10:43 PM UTC

$6 billion industry vs. 107,000+ Denver low-wage workers

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Progressive Promoter

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Disclaimer: I’m working on the Campaign for a Healthy Denver

Earlier this week the Campaign for a Healthy Denver and the Restaurant Opportunity Centers United (ROC) released a research report (summary here) exposing the motives and true agenda of the National Restaurant Association (NRA) – one of the national lobbying powerhouses funding the opposition to paid sick days Initiative 300 in Denver. Deep-pocketed lobbyists are waging a fight to keep profits high at the expense of public health.  

National Restaurant Association Executive V.P. Rob Gifford told Nation’s Restaurant News: “Denver should not be viewed in isolation.”

Under the umbrella of Keep Denver Competitive,” the NRA and the Hospitality Industry PAC, at least $645,270 has been raised to date to keep workers from being able to earn paid sick time. While some opposition funding has come from corporate CEOs and lobbyists based in Denver, a significant portion has come from out of state players.

The NRA based in Washington, D.C. is the single largest contributor to the opposition and has given more than $100,000 to defeat this initiative. More than a quarter of a million dollars of the opposition’s donations are from out of state – and many of the local restaurants that have contributed to the campaign against the paid sick days initiative are part of large, profitable national chains, including Pizza Hut, KFC, Taco Bell, Buffalo Wild Wings and Morton’s of Chicago.  Just last weekend multinational companies like Brinker International and Coca-Cola participated in a Williamsburg Virginia golf tournament to raise money to defeat Initiative 300.

This $6 billion industry opposes every single modest public health and workplace standard, from paid sick leave, lower blood alcohol levels for DUI’s, smoke-free workplaces, changes in the minimum wage, overtime pay and even creating space in restaurants for nursing mothers, nationally and in Colorado.  The New York Times reported on the NRA and Herman Cain’s opposition to these policies in a the front page story last Sunday.  

In this case, these national players are trying to prevent more than 107,000 Denver workers from being able to stay home when they’re sick – a simple policy that would protect not only co-workers, but us, their customers from catching the flu or whatever contagious illness is going around.  

Let’s be clear – this is not about our neighborhood burger joint. There’s an agenda here – and it doesn’t include protecting your health or the ability of workers to stay home when they’re sick.  

Comments

5 thoughts on “$6 billion industry vs. 107,000+ Denver low-wage workers

  1. The last thing I want in a restaurant is my food handled by someone who is sick. I’m happy to pay a little more to get sick less often.

    I also don’t understand why corporations oppose this. If everyone is required to provide it, the playing field remains level.

    ps – writing this from home because I’m sick today and so taking a (paid) day off.

    1. It’s a matter of “principle” with them.

      Well, I’m sure implementing these things costs money, and I do know they’re loathe to raise prices when the money won’t go toward profit. But when have big companies regarded spending on their employees as anything but a burden?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

221 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!