U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

20%

10%

(D) Michael Bennet (D) Phil Weiser
55% 50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

40%↓

30%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson (D) A. Gonzalez
50%↓ 30%↑
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

80%↑

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Milat Kiros

(D) Wanda James

70%↓

20%↑

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

30%↓

20%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

80%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

53%↓

48%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

[wpdreams_ajaxsearchlite]
October 23, 2011 05:57 PM UTC

What if the solutions we are proposing - won't help?

  •  
  • by: DavidThi808

from The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All The Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History,Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better

For healthcare, insurance coverage may not improve anything:

The famous RAND Corporation study of the 1970s gave thousands of Americans 100 percent free medical care, while the control group had to face insurance co-payments for care, as under normal circumstances. The group with free care consumed 25-30 percent more medical services. Yet, except for the very poorest group, the free health care didn’t make people any healthier. Most plausibly, that outcome is because many factors besides health care influence our health. When it comes to surgical patients, the uninsured seem to have better health outcomes than do Medicaid patients, even after controlling for thirty different comorbid conditions and many other relevant variables. You can give this “non-result” a lot of different twists or reinterpretations, but still it is further evidence questioning whether extra medical spending is bringing huge value.

And for education, more money seems to have zero impact:

How has spending on education changed over the last forty years? Well, it has gone up a lot. The test scores haven’t risen since the early 1970s, but, adjusted for inflation, we’re spending more than twice as much per pupil. In 1970-1971, the per-pupil expenditures were $5,593, and in 2006-2007, those same expenditures are measured at $12,463.



U.S. spending on education, as a percentage of our economy, is well above the OECD average and, by one measure, is second only to Iceland. Yet at least at the K-12 level, we are not performing at a superior level compared to other countries, including our neighbor Canada.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about Donald Trump

Posts about Rep. Gabe Evans

Posts about Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about the Colorado House

Posts about the Colorado Senate


89 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!