U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 09, 2011 07:22 PM UTC

Leaving Money on the Table With Kevin Lundberg

  •  
  • by: Colorado Pols

Last week, it was reported that the legislative oversight committee of the state’s new Health Exchange Board, created by this year’s health care exchange legislation Senate Bill 200 to implement a key state component of federal health care reform passed in 2010, missed an important deadline to apply for $22 million in federal startup grant funds. AP reported:

Colorado will miss a [Sept. 30th] deadline to apply for $22 million in federal funds to set up an insurance marketplace because Republicans and Democrats can’t agree on how to apply for the money.

The Colorado Health Exchange is a virtual health insurance marketplace approved by lawmakers last term. Some Republicans opposed the idea because insurance exchanges are required under the new health care law, which some Republicans believe will be overturned…

There was no legitimate reason for the five Republicans on the ten-member legislative oversight committee to pitch a fit over this $22 million grant, except to take another gratuitous opportunity to lodge their larger objections to “ObamaCare” in the record. The Denver paper responded forcefully in an editorial last week, accusing Republicans in unusually strong language of “politicking,” and calling their objections “a waste of time and resources.”

This did not sit well with Sen. Kevin Lundberg of the oversight committee. Responding to the Denver paper’s editorial Thursday, Lundberg insists that the objections to applying for these funds were not “politicking” at all, saying five days from the application’s approval by the Health Exchange Board was not enough time to read a 71-page document (seriously?). There is another deadline at the end of December they can meet to apply, but Lundberg mentions the possibility of private funds being solicited to pay for Colorado’s exchange instead.

And that’s where this gets sticky–private funds, possibly the express goal of Republicans if this obstruction of federal grant money persists, wouldn’t have the same “strings” attached as federal grant money. We can’t tell you exactly what those “strings” are, but neither does Lundberg. He’s content to leave that vague and scary, because, well, this is all a bunch of “politicking.” Don’t take our word for it, see the press release the GOP sent out on the impasse:

“This over-reaching proposal is a precise example of why House Republicans fought so hard for legislative oversight of Colorado’s Health Benefit Exchange,” said state Rep. Jim Kerr, R-Littleton. “This current application would push Colorado into a one-size-fits-all mandate from Washington. Colorado needs Colorado-specific solutions to meet our Colorado-specific needs. That’s why we created a health benefit exchange to fit the unique needs of Colorado and to protect Coloradans from an out-of-control Washington, D.C. bureaucracy.”

Very odd considering the Health Exchange Board wrote the application for federal funds. Whether Jim Kerr and Kevin Lundberg like it or not, SB-200 was passed to create the Board whose job it is to apply for this federal grant money. “Strings” and all. Obviously, the Exchange Board doesn’t see an inconsistency with “Colorado-specific needs” here. On the other hand, if the state were to pursue private donations for the exchange, what’s to stop Kerr and Lundberg from abandoning the federal guidelines completely–and demanding some nutty thinktank plan that the federal government could well take over as inadequate under the law in 2014?

Oh, right. “ObamaCare” will be repealed by then! But remember, folks, it’s not about politics! We get the feeling that, much like Rep. Amy Stephens’ descent into nonsensical intransigence over this same legislation, the powerful bipartisan interests who supported the plan from the beginning will pull the reins on Lundberg’s nonsense before the end of December.

After that, somebody can explain the wisdom of making Lundberg the spokesman for anything.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

147 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!