“I once again have become a titular head of the Republican Party, calling the shots.”
–Rush Limbaugh, yesterday
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Schrodingers Dog
IN: Caption This Photo: #WalkAway From Lauren Boebert!
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Holtorf Slams Boebert Over Hypocritical Trump Trial Field Trip
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Holtorf Slams Boebert Over Hypocritical Trump Trial Field Trip
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
You know, regulations removed or modified, jobs created, economic prosperity inspired?
and you might come across as someone who isn’t just a (poorly written, badly argued) talking point barf-o-matic.
I would have thought that the administration or leading Democratic thought organizations would have taken what the President said more seriously, the American people certainly do.
The president makes a clarion call for action, yet there is no follow-up.
Most people would assert that he doesn’t care, was full of crap, or demands no accountability from his own administration. None of these thoughts are good. They inspire the negative bent to the administrations poll results.
educate yourself. How does the executive branch go about implementing or repealing regulations? What is the general timeframe? What are the requirements and process? Come back later when you know something.
Now we all know that the administration makes administrative rule making. Of course it’s based off of statutes. The administration recklessly administered policy making (with Pelosi and team), then went on a frenzied rule making pitch that has been choking business. Heck, look at the rule making on our k-12 system, they have it just as bad.
Just think, the Democrat-Obama malaise has only just begun. Democrat economy crushing policies are not fully implemented yet. Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, NLRB rulings, and crushing EPA regulations (ozone, clean coal, fracking …) will not be implemented until 2012+.
However, your many other economy crushing ideas that have been stopped including card check, the equal pay act, carbon taxation (EPA is implementing a backdoor carbon taxation), amnesty and open borders (Obama is trying to bypass though), and new levels of crushing taxation (unlimited payroll taxes, increased state taxes (Colorado income tax rate increasing 8%) for federal mandates (particularly Obamacare).
What are those statutory requirements you note? What do they require?
And, finally, please show that Obama (executive branch, yes–rule makings) and Pelosi (legislative branch, no rule-makings, they pass things call laws…) ‘recklessly implemented policy making’ and went on a ‘frenzied rule making pitch’? Yes, I want to see the work, the cites, and an indication that the pace of federal rule-making has reached some sort of ‘frenzied pitch’ unknown (or unusual) to previous administrations.
Otherwise you are, as per usual, talking out your ass.
you know, when he is pressed for actual information
‘recklessly implemented policy making’ and went on a ‘frenzied rule making pitch”
Instances:
1. Obamacare
2. That abortion of a finance bill Dodd-Frank
3. EPA, big law making failed, but not the rule making, there full bore ahead killing jobs
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/…
Full of unregulated fracking fluid.
Because that showed your level of grasp on economic reality.
generate “trillions in tax revenue” was by cutting a trillions of dollars from the taxes of the wealthiest 2%?
I’m not sure why I think that, I might have heard it from Rush this week?
Now you all know there are links to expand on this, but just incase you can’t google, here’s the primary reference page.
http://www.gop.gov/indepth/jobs
The subject line above was meant to grab your attention. It probably belongs more with a comment extolling the benefits and outcomes of previous Democrat attempts at job creation …. Let me know when you find that data.
In the meantime, your Democratic thought leaders on race and religion.
QUOTES FROM “REAL TIME WITH BILL MAHER”
must have drawn afternoon kindergarten this year.
I figure to counter the Libertad daily regurgitation of the same thing s/he’s posted for the past 3 years I’d post some interesting items.
First up – Standard teaching vs. Khan Academy
As the article says, the study is too small to be statistically valid. But it definitely shows that the Khan Academy approach is worth further study.
Really good article about the very different approach to higher ed that WGU takes – The College For-profits Should Fear
Why Founders Make the Best Leaders
What Every Government (Except One) Doesn’t Get About Startups
Buh-bye! You guys have fun, though.
Click on open thread –
Scroll, Libertad – ignore post and replies.
Scroll, scroll – David T., David T., David T., David T., ignore all.
Scroll, scroll, scroll – more Libertad, more David T. – ignoring, ignoring…
end of thread – done.
You know who I’m talking to.
http://crooksandliars.com/
When I first saw that link, I wondered why you would send us to a GOP site. That’s what I get for jumping to conclusions based merely on my experience and history with the Repugs.
It is called ‘Crooks and Liars’ after all.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…
Socializing costs, privating profits–the corporate way. Thanks Mr. President!
and it’s been tested by research …
What ever industry groups claim to be the potential costs of compliance with environmental/safety/health regulations are overblown by at least 2 orders of magnitude.
Interested persons can start with
US GAO. (1999) Environmental Protection: Assessing the Impacts of EPA’s Regulations Through Retrospective Studies 5.
Harrington, W. et al (1999) On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates.
Goodstein & Hodges (1997) Polluted Data: Overestimating Environmental Costs. Am. Prospect (Nov/Dec issue).
There are many more such studies. Not only are the potential costs ridiculously over-estimated by industry groups, but good stiff regulations are best at stimulating innovation that dramatically reduces costs of compliance.
Until the L-tads, ArapGOBs, MarkGs, and even ellbees of the world can come up with actual data to support their “job-killing” meme, it is wise to assume that they haven’t a clue what they are talking about.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50…
This is really cutting into the poor Speaker’s tanning schedule 🙁
Apple’s Lost iPhone Search Team Flashed Three Badges to Toss Man’s Home – weird story