CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 13, 2021 09:48 AM UTC

Signs Point to Possible But Difficult Road to Victory for GOP Activists Who Want to Opt Out of Primaries

  • 10 Comments
  • by: Michael Lund

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

null

With a crucial vote coming before the Colorado Republican Party’s state central committee next month on whether to continue allowing unaffiliated voters to participate in Republican primary elections, recent voting records of that governing body indicate that grassroots Republicans hold power over establishment members, and could indicate that the state GOP will opt out of open primary elections.

Three different votes on issues before the state central committee in the past year indicate that, with the current composition of the 518-member committee, grassroots-affiliated members could prevail in their campaign to have the GOP opt-out of open primaries and, instead, select their nominees for federal and state races through systems of caucus, convention, or assembly in which only Republicans can participate.

First, last summer, the state central committee elected Randy Corporon — a Tea Party leader, conspiracist attorney, talk radio host, and Trump supporter — to the position of National Committeeman for the state of Colorado.

Corporon cites this win over Eli Bremer, an establishment Republican who recently announced his campaign to challenge incumbent U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), as proof that the grassroots-affiliated central committee members hold sway with their numbers.

“When I was elected Republican National Committeeman with more votes than the next two establishment candidates, Bill Cadman and Eli Bremer,” said Corporon on his Saturday morning conservative talk radio show on KNUS, “that’s the Republican Central Committee. That’s those delegates voting. And so we know that the people who actually take the time to donate their time to the Republican Party and be a part of this structure are the conservatives that want to see a fighting Republican Party.”

Then, this spring, the Colorado GOP state central committee voted to install Kristi Burton Brown as Chairwoman of the party over her establishment rival, former Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler.

Burton Brown cut her teeth in politics as a teenaged grassroots activist organizing for Colorado’s first Personhood Amendment, an anti-abortion referendum that failed in 2008. Similar versions of Personhood subsequently failed again, twice, in 2010 and 2012.

She served as Vice chair of the CO GOP under Chairman U.S. Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) in the previous executive administration which won support from grassroots activists after Susan Beckman was defeated for the chairmanship.

Burton Brown’s honeymoon with the grassroots faction is challenged now with her recent statements indicating a reversal on challenging Colorado’s liberal abortion laws, and for standing with establishment types at gas station press conference to introduce the milquetoast, conciliatory, poll-tested “Colorado Commitment.”

Gessler, as an establishment Republican, was seen by grassroots activists as being squishy on his support for Trump. He was saddled with a negative association to Colorado’s all mail-ballot elections and election reform laws, the implementation of which he oversaw as Secretary of State. As an election law attorney, he also carried the stigma of working as a consultant, which grassroots Republicans blame for sucking money from campaigns while losing elections.

Finally, in an atypical twist of tradition, the GOP state central committee overturned an executive committee determination which called for a re-do on El Paso County GOP executive officer elections. Grassroots leader Corporon voted for a new election as an executive committee member, then reversed his stance in the central committee vote.

By a margin of 206 to 177, the process and results of the county election were allowed to stand. Grassroots committee members cheered the decision.

“It’s the division between the current grassroots leadership and the old establishment leadership,” said Corporon. “It’s been a constant battle down there to unseat [EPC Chair] Vickie Tonkins. And more importantly, as I said during the [central committee] meeting, absent some clear evidence of fraud or criminality, the state party should not interfere in these county elections.”

RELATED: Bid to Opt Out of Open Republican Primaries in CO Is Close to Success, Now With Help From Tancredo, Say Organizers

Despite these precedent votes favoring grassroots positions on issues before the central committee, a significant challenge remains for proponents of the opt-out. While most measures require a simple majority of votes to pass, opting out of primaries requires 75% affirmation among the 518 committee members according Proposition 108, the open primary referendum passed by voters in 2016.

Chuck Bonniwell, a leader in the lobbying effort to achieve that 75% threshold, explained that requirement during a recent appearance on a KNUS radio program.

“So they said, ‘Oh, we’ll be really tricky and … we’ll make it almost impossible.’ … You have to have 75% of all the [GOP Central Committee] membership [in order to opt out],” said Bonniwell. “So, if you don’t show up or don’t vote, that constitutes a ‘no’ [vote]. So, we’ve got to get 75% to say ‘yes’ at the September 18th meeting. And obviously we’re threatening [to reach] that [threshold] or they would not have pulled out Jon Caldara and the Independence Institute and all the rest of them to attack us. It means we’re really making a difference.

With these parameters, the success of Bonniwell’s effort is far from certain, but he projects optimism in his statement nonetheless.

Grassroots activists in the Colorado GOP — referred to as “crazies” by some establishment GOP types — believe that open primary elections in 2018 and 2020 have produced Republican nominees who are too moderate to win in general elections, while weakening the Republican brand by employing poll-tested messaging, compromising with Democrats, and abandoning Republican values and principles. They also contend that moderate Republicans are ineffective in opposing the legislative majorities and the executive branch monopoly held by Democrats in Colorado.

Establishment Republicans — considered to be more moderate and labeled as RINOs (Republican In Name Only) and SWINOs (Swamp Creature RINOs) by their GOP rivals — generally believe that engaging with and appealing to unaffiliated voters with some policy compromises and attractive candidates will lead the state GOP back to political relevance.

They try to steer the party away from the divisive extremist positions, conspiracy messaging, and antagonistic scorched-earth strategies favored by Tea Party activists, QAnon adherents, and Trump loyalists of the GOP’s grassroots faction.

Proponents of the open primary opt-out have lobbied committee members across the state throughout the summer and have broadcast their enthusiasm and optimism for successfully opting out of open primaries over their talk-radio airwaves and elsewhere. Opponents have published op-eds in online and print media outlets, trying to rally support for keeping open primaries.

 

Comments

10 thoughts on “Signs Point to Possible But Difficult Road to Victory for GOP Activists Who Want to Opt Out of Primaries

  1. So how would this work if the purists get their way?

    Currently, in primary elections,  Rs get R ballots. Dems get D ballots. Unaffiliateds get a primary ballot, but can only vote for either R or D.

    Would unaffiliateds then be disenfranchised in the primary or only get D ballots? Or if they vote for an R, have to register as Republican in order for their vote to count?

    It seems like this proposal affects many more people than registered Republicans.

    1. They probably haven't thought it all out.

      They're known for that. 

      Remember when Daddy Bush's response when he was asked in 1988 debate with Dukakis whether the woman having an abortion should go to prison or just the doctor: "I haven't sorted out all the penalties yet."

    2. I think I understand it this way:  if Republicans opt out, they would not have a state-funded primary … Republican "candidates would be chosen at GOP assembly meetings next spring instead of the June 28, 2022, primary."  And Republicans would check party membership at the doors to the meetings.

      Unaffiliated voters can vote in ANY party's primary ballot.  If the Republicans opt out, I'd think there would be a HUGE incentive for every other party to create a contest between two or more candidates for a "top of the ballot" office and then advertise to the maximum extent possible that they welcome voters to help determine their candidate.  Easy way to drive awareness (and potential engagement/commitment)  as an alternative to the TGOP.

  2. Burton-Brown, Corporon, Bonniwell….what a bunch of bozos.

    With clowns like these, and some of their compatriots, trying to run the show, it's no wonder why our party keeps losing elections except in the reddest of red districts.

    1. Yeah, that, . . .

      . . . plus all the really crappy and disastrous policy ideas, and that reality denial thing, and their fealty to billionaires, and their tendency towards autocracy, and that theocracy thing, . . .

      . . . then there’s the guns, the loathing of science, voting rights elimination, love it or leave it, racism, climate and carbon,  . . .

      . . . that America all by itself thing, corporations are people too, financial deregulation, that nonsense about boot straps, drill baby drill, I got mine, corporate welfare, white nationalism. . .

      . . . but if you completely overlook every one of those minor details, plus probably a couple hundred or so more other things, and pretty much all of the 21st Century — maybe even as far back as to about 1960, and most importantly can pretend that none of all of that matters in the slightest, well then, it truly is a grand old party with much potential and much to be proud of . . .

      . . . (except, of course, for Burton-Brown, Corporon, Bonniwell, and several millions of other nutters, lunatics, grifters, conspiracy theorists, sycophants, and . . .)

      1. Keep walking the streets with your lantern, Diogenes, and looking for honest men (and women). Like your namesake from ancient Greece.

        Meanwhile, maybe you shouldn’t be throwing stones considering the giant clusterf**k now underway in the Democratic caucus in the US House. For months, many radical progressives have been demanding that the Senate pass their massive spending bill before they will consider a vote on the bipartisan infrastructure bill. Finally, some common sense moderates in the caucus are pushing back saying approve the infrastructure bill and then we’ll talk more about the spending bill. With you Dems having a very small margin of error in the House numbers………maybe now is not the time to go all out Bernie.

        1. I’m not in Sanders camp on most things, but I think it is time to go all out on the big bill. Child tax credits are in the mail; hard investments in infrastructure are critical if we’re going to compete with China. Human infrastructure to care for our aging population.  Most of us see the need for an Apollo-Mission initiative on climate. 
           

          Our debt-GDP ratio after WWII reached 125% and we managed to build a robust middle class and dominated the worlds economy (all with marginal top tax rates north of 90% and effective rates hovering around 70%). 

          I have a lot of faith that Grandma Nancy is going to get us through this and deliver both bills. Then all eyes can turn ba k to Manchin and Synema.

          Maybe our billionaires can go back to just building libraries and naming hospital wings for now?

        2. You’re right, the problems in the Democratic Party (with which I am not affiliated, btw) help solve all those GOP issues, make their performance soooooo very much better, and allow for your stone-chucking.  (But, hey, at least they don’t have Burton-Brown, Corporon, or Bonniwell, huh?  I mean, don’t those people really just suck???) . . .

          And, anyway, your party is, and has been, clearly the second best major party (. . . and, that’s within the top two, since you’re keeping score . . .) in America for decades — so there’s that . . .

          . . . A red ribbon* to hang on your wall.

          * These days it undoubtedly says “Ttump” on it. But, don’t they all?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

273 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!