CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 24, 2011 12:34 AM UTC

Hair Of The Dog In 2012

  • 2 Comments
  • by: harrydoby

If Republicans succeed in tanking the economy this year by forcing the country into default, perverse as it may seem, the likely result could be to achieve their dream of making Obama a one-term president.

So let’s assume that during a deepening recession, Obama loses his job next year.  I would hope that America doesn’t go completely insane, and elects the least crazy of the current crop of GOP candidates – Mitt Romney.  Further, let’s also assume they maintain control of the House, and even squeak out a 51 seat majority in the Senate.

What would a return to “Conservative” principles (whatever that means anymore) likely result for our nation?

Let’s see…

No new taxes.  Even President Romney would be unable to break the evil spell of Grover Norquist and the Tea Party on the religious chant of “No taxes, No how”. In fact, the pressure to find more taxes to cut would be pretty irresistible. Well, since most of the current budget is mandatory spending for entitlements, while discretionary spending is for the military and infrastructure, without new sources of revenue, trillion dollar deficits will stretch for years to come.  A Republican president and Congress won’t likely trim too much from the military budget, and while they might make several attempts to take a hacksaw to Medicare and Social Security, they would basically have to eliminate both to put a dent in a trillion dollar annual deficit, particularly as the recession deepens as consumer spending continues to plummet, and government spending is reduced.  It becomes a self-perpetuating vicious cycle if you don’t believe in government deficit spending to keep the economy afloat.  Perhaps Romney would perform one of his patented 180’s and put forth another TARP-like rescue package.  But who wants to bet the Tea Party nitwits would allow that to pass?

Repeal and Replace Healthcare Reform.  So now that newly unemployed residents of Hoovervilles popping up across the nation have lost any health insurance they might have had, a repeal of the Affordable Healthcare Act would leave them without any safety net at all.  So off to the emergency room it is for any health issue their kids might have.  Believe it or not, that comes out of taxpayers’ pockets.  So much for cutting government expenditures on healthcare.  I suppose they could eliminate state and federal funds to hospitals, so that the free market can decide if we just have too many darned ER’s and clinics after all!

Deregulation.  Since Republicans are all for “free enterprise – let the market decide” principles, we can be assured that a Republican Congress would push, and CEO Romney would support, massive deregulation of businesses, including likely repeal of anti-trust legislation, either explicitly or defacto, through government decisions in favor of industry consolidation (driven also by the continuing recession and need for “economies of scale”) where the strong feed on the weak.  Not only would monopolies start controlling major segments of the market, leading to less innovation, higher prices, and less need for competition-driven efficiencies in service, you would see an acceleration in media consolidation as well.  So we would get less diversity of opinion, and the few outlets remaining would also gain control over the “facts” such as Fox News has been attempting for several years.

So how would Republicans dig themselves out of this hole (hmm — funny, if you find your self in a hole, aren’t you supposed to stop digging)?  Well, their dire predictions of hyperinflation would probably finally come true, even propagandized by the UniVoice News as a “really good thing”. With the debt probably hitting $20 trillion by 2015 and another election coming up, inflation would provide a short-lived sheen of rising incomes and prosperity, plus rising government receipts to pay down the now “cheaper” national debt.

If we thought the drunken excesses by Republicans during the Bush years, characterized by reckless, unfunded spending on wars, tax cuts for the wealthy, and blatant partisanship in illegal hiring practices in the Department of Justice (literally placing a partisan thumb on the scales of justice) was bad, just wait until we try a bit of the “Hair of the Dog”.

Comments

2 thoughts on “Hair Of The Dog In 2012

  1. Republicans would happily raise taxes on the middle class by eliminating the mortgage deduction and taxing good health care plans, along with the seemingly popular plan to make sure everyone pays income tax in addition to all the other taxes they pay. Look at the hardcore Republican position in the Gang of Six or Simpson/Bowles commission.

    The only thing that counts as a tax increase is following the law that Bush and Congressional Republicans wrote: the sunset on tax cuts for the rich.

    1. SXP, you are correct of course.  The so-called “Fair Tax” pushed in conservative quarters would replace a progressive income tax with a regressive national sales tax.

      So people with little savings would wind up paying probably 20% higher for any necessities they have to purchase.

      But the billionaire hedge fund managers would no longer worry about paying even the 15% capital gains tax on their bonuses, much less on the rest of their income.

      True, they would also see a 20% increase in the cost of a yacht or private jet, so it cannot be said they will be completely without “sacrifice”.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

149 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!