President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 15, 2011 10:43 PM UTC

Who Cares for the Caregiver?

  • 4 Comments
  • by: Car 31

Today, as I type, the Colorado Board of Health is hearing public testimony on proposed rules that further define what it means to be a medical marijuana caregiver. The proposed rule seeks to clarify a 2009 Court of Appeals decision stating that caregivers must provide more than just marijuana to patients. The proposed Board of Health rule states that patients shall not name a caregiver if all they are receiving is medical marijuana. Caregivers are the people who provide medical marijuana to 5 or fewer patients and are exempt from dispensary regulations.

Proponents of the rule argue that this will help crack down on fraudulent operations and help legitimize the industry in Colorado.

Opponents argue that caregivers will no longer be afforded the protection of the law and patients will go without medicine.  

Amendment 20 states that a primary care-giver:

means a person, other than the patient and the patient’s physician, who is eighteen years of age or older and has significant responsibility for managing the well-being of a patient who has a debilitating medical condition

What does ‘significant responsibility’ entail and how does we interpret the Court of Appeal’s declaration that a caregiver’s responsibility to their patient extends beyond the drug?

As usual, the proponents at today’s hearing put their best foot forward. One gentleman, who went by the nom de guerre Scooby, claims that his wife’s sexual attentions constitute significant responsibility and if the rule were to pass, well, let’s just say Scooby’s needs would not be met.

Other passionate advocates heckled, interrupted, berated, cussed and threw things at the Board of Health members to express their frustration before the lunch break.

During testimony on the medical marijuana regulation bills, we heard legitimate stories of how a man provided relief to his dying wife. We also heard moving stories of how those suffering from debilitating conditions found solace and liberation from illness courtesy of medical marijuana caregivers. These are the true heroes of today’s debate.

Caregivers deserve the full protection and consideration Amendment 20 offers, however, I support the idea that, in order to earn the title care-giver, one must provide more service to a sick person, than solely providing a drug.

What say you?

Comments

4 thoughts on “Who Cares for the Caregiver?

  1. Big fat doobies?

    Okay, serious for a minute. The question you ask is a sound one. A primary care giver is usually in charge of many aspects of care, sometimes including power of attorney over health, making decisions about in home care, medications administered, et al. Perhaps the phrase “primary care giver” is just altogether inappropriate in this particular medical aspect. I would think a licensed physician should be the primary care giver for a patient and a medical marijuana dispenser would be serving more in a pharmaceutical role.  

    1. They were throwing extra product they had and screaming stuff like, “This bud’s for you, you fascist, traitor pig!!!”

      No, they weren’t, I’m joking.

      I admire caregivers and their desire to serve people in need. I don’t think the new rule, the Board adopted it yesterday, will ruin those who already provide legitimate services to sick people. True caregivers already provide additional services that would fall under this new test of caregiver legitimacy.

      I hope the new rule will allow law enforcement to identify those who are growing pot just to sell it to their friends or others without debilitating illnesses.

      I couldn’t agree with you more, a physician or nurse should provide services and care to the seriously ill and dispensaries would provide the drug, as pharmacies do. Unfortunately, those who drafted Amendment 20 stuck us with what we have so we figure it out as we go…

      1. You make a great point, Car 31. It will probably take years to fine tune this system so people who need it and can handle it can get it, and people who abuse it and do harm to themselves, can’t. Accurate scientific information is crucial to common-sense policy.

      2. You make a great point, Car 31. It will probably take years to fine tune this system so people who need it and can handle it can get it, and people who abuse it and do harm to themselves, can’t. Accurate scientific information is crucial to common-sense policy.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

102 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!