President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta



CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson



CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd



CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese



CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore



CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans



State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 12, 2021 09:13 AM UTC

Global Media Blows Up Boebert's Origin Story Bullcrap

  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Somebody give Rep. Lauren Boebert a shovel, please:

Compare this with Boebert’s detailed and unequivocal statements below. She really should stop talking now.


Rep. Lauren “Q*Bert” Boebert (R-Twitter).

On Wednesday, Rep. Lauren “Q*Bert” Boebert spoke on the floor of the U.S. House in opposition to the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021, legislation that would bring federal law into line with Colorado’s universal background check law on the books since 2013 and credited with preventing thousands of prohibited would-be-purchasers from buying guns. As Ray Erku of the Rifle Citizen-Telegram reports, Boebert referred Wesdnesday to an alleged violent incident outside the Shooters Grill she has long invoked as part of her origin story to explain why she and her restaurant staff carry guns:

Speaking on the House floor Wednesday during a debate over background checks, the staunch Second-Amendment advocate again used the 2013 incident to justify why she openly carries firearms.

“There was an altercation outside my restaurant where a man was physically beat to death, there were no weapons involved, he was beat to death by another man’s hands,” she said.

Years before her entry into politics, Boebert told the same story to FOX News in a puff piece about Shooters Grill:

“I started open-carrying maybe a month after we opened just because I am a woman in business and I was there early hours and late nights,” Boebert said. “There was a man beaten to death in the alley behind my restaurant last year. It was very unfortunate.”

It was lost in the din as Boebert barreled to victory last fall by saturating the news cycle with her now-trademark daily firehose of Trumpian rhetoric, but this story from Boebert about a supposed beating outside her restaurant that inspired her to carry a gun was investigated and debunked last year in a report by the Colorado Sun’s Nancy Lofholm:

“There was a violent altercation in our back alley where a man was physically beaten to death and it immediately prompted the question, ‘How will I defend my people?’ So, I began to carry that day,” Boebert told the Durango Herald last year.

The Rifle Police Department has no record of such a murder. [Pols emphasis] A man did die on the sidewalk down the street from Shooters in the early morning of Aug. 22, 2013. Initially, it was investigated as a possible homicide, but an autopsy determined the man died from a drug overdose.

Although Boebert was able to get away with telling this fictional story on the campaign trail in CD-3, repeating it on the floor of the U.S. House as an elected member of Congress naturally means it’s going to be subject to more questioning. And that’s exactly what has happened since Wednesday–the Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler with a blistering multi-Pinocchio fact check:

We often find that politicians’ origin stories get untethered from reality the more they are repeated.

Boebert tells the story of a man who was beaten to death outside her restaurant. Police considered it a possible homicide but quickly concluded that the man died of a drug overdose. There was a fight, but it took place blocks away from her restaurant; the man merely ran past the back of her business before collapsing.

Boebert earns Three Pinocchios.

The UK Independent, which has taken an interest in reporting on Boebert that we hope doesn’t hurt tourism from across the pond:

Lauren Boebert argued against gun background checks with a story about a man being beaten to death behind her restaurant – but who actually died from a drug overdose.

The Colorado lawmaker made the debunked claim on the floor of the House and has told the same story repeatedly on the campaign trail and in interviews.


We obtained official Rifle Police Department reports, and an autopsy and toxicology report. Based on those documents, we are issuing a rating of “Mostly False” as to Boebert’s claims. A man did die after being found close to her restaurant, on Aug. 22, 2013, and he had been involved in a physical altercation earlier that night. However, he was not “beaten to death,” but rather died of a drug overdose. Furthermore, the location where he was found was not “outside” of Shooters Grill, or even in an adjacent alleyway.

Yahoo News:

The police department told the newspaper that a man had indeed died down the street from the gun-themed Shooters Grill restaurant in August, but that an autopsy indicated that he had died after overdosing on drugs.

Yahoo News reported that this was not the first time that Boebert had made this claim, as she told the same story multiple times when running for office.

After being shelled by media outlets confirming and reconfirming that this long-retold story was not true, Rep. Boebert’s newest communications flack made the mistake of trying to defend Boebert with the Washington Post. He probably should have saved his breath:

Update: Ben Stout, Boebert’s communications director, contacted The Fact Checker after this article appeared and argued that her statement was accurate because Green’s body was discovered about a half block from her restaurant. He could not explain why she claims Green was beaten to death outside the restaurant, except to cite a local newspaper report shortly after Green’s death (nearly eight years ago) that had said the cause of death was unknown.

That conversation had to have felt a little like Sean Spicer and the biggest inaugural audience ever.

All of this is of course very bad for Rep. Boebert’s credibility, completely wrecking a major point in her bio she has relied upon for years to build her public image–and the only saving grace we can think of for Boebert is that her loyal social media following is well past the point of getting hung up on small matters like credibility.

For the rest of us, it’s more proof of a troubling pattern that has emerged in a remarkably short time.

Under scrutiny, everything about Lauren Boebert collapses into fraudulence.


12 thoughts on “Global Media Blows Up Boebert’s Origin Story Bullcrap

  1. So Ben, . . .

    . . . I spose’ she has studies showing that would-be assailants in crime-infested areas, like Rifle, are also strongly deterred by young women in hot pants?

  2. “So, its was after that we all started carrying guns, because we saw that, obviously, just naming the place ‘Shooters Grille’ hadn’t been enough by itself to keep us safe. We just felt like we had no other choice . . .”

    1. Because you just never know when you'll have to pump a few rounds of lead into some poor soul who is experiencing a drug overdose down the street from your restaurant. Yeah, her story totally makes sense.

      1. …or maybe she could focus her attention on the root cause of this incident: addiction (and its sources)? 

        Across Rural America, Drug Casts a Grim Shadow

        Methamphetamine use and crime are also overrunning rural counties in Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Colorado, North Dakota and the Texas Panhandle, law enforcement officials say.

        In Iowa, rapidly growing methamphetamine use is behind a surge in thefts of tractors and other heavy farm equipment, as well as burglaries in vacant farmsteads, said Todd Johnson, the Audubon County sheriff.

  3. Very few would argue with Boebert that a woman might want to carry a gun for self-defense. If it’s properly holstered and locked, and she’s trained on it, it’s not necessarily a danger to other people. Rifle (population  ~ 9500) is probably not a place where women are attacked by strangers- yet they have a fairly high violent crime rate, probably mostly domestic violence and simple fights. And Boebert knows about those from personal experience

    I can also accept her concealed carrying on the streets in DC, for self-defense. Again, she needs to comply with local law

    But walking her Glock around her own restaurant or the halls of Congress, where there are dedicated, armed, police officers, is purely a gimic to excite the gun nutters in her base. It has nothing to do with safety.


    1. With all those caveats it almost sounds like you're arguing that, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I wish the "gun nutters in her base" could remember that perambulatory clause sometimes.

      1. People have the right to bear arms, and that needs to be regulated…by age, building, locality, city, whatever makes sense. The Supreme Court said so.

        I don’t know what “militia” means, but I don’t think it pertains to the III%ers who are Boebert’s fans that stormed the Capitol Jan. 6, nor to Boebert herself, even though she would disagree.

    2. they have a fairly high violent crime rate, probably mostly domestic violence and simple fights

      I wonder if there might be a reason . . . Perhaps some kind of industry that attracts a relatively high proportion of transient and temporary younger male workers into the area ???

  4. Her story makes no sense to the rest of us. Wait- how does a drug overdose death translate into having a gun for safety?  You gonna shoot the drugs? Shoot yourself to prevent the overdose?

    Her story does make sense to people who see anything scary or any crime as proof that they live in a dangerous world and need guns.

    This is especially true for people who also know they would commit crime or ignore the law anytime they choose to do so. I am one of the good guys, and I will ignore the law anytime it's convenient for me, which proves that everyone else will too and that is scary so I need guns.

    I know people who only see the scary things on tv or in movies. But it reinforces their view that they are living in a scary, dangerous world and so they must have guns.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

51 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!