CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 01, 2011 02:03 AM UTC

Harvey vs. Wadhams, Anyone?

  • 27 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Bartels revises her initial report–Sen. Ted Harvey now says he will indeed resign his Senate seat if elected GOP chairman.

—–

That’s the word from Lynn Bartels at the Denver paper’s blog: state Sen. Ted Harvey of Highlands Ranch announced today that he will challenge Colorado GOP chairman Dick Wadhams for his well-paid position at party leadership elections in March. Sen. Harvey has worked in recent years to raise his profile among party activists at all levels; from helping his fellow legislators on campaigns, to a prominent role in ousting the Douglas County School Board in 2009.

Harvey is not required to resign his Senate seat should he defeat Wadhams; we could see that working in his favor when it comes time for GOP activists to chart their course due to his hands-on experience. Or, just like they whispered about Wadhams’ taking on additional responsibilities while serving as chairman…it could work against him.

Bottom line? We’re not as sure that Sen. Harvey represents the kind of risk to Wadhams that other Republican possibilities discussed in recent weeks likely would if they got in the race, but Harvey is going to pose a real challenge. Harvey is a credible enough figure to mount a successful campaign, and he has a couple of things going for him:

For one thing, Harvey is likely to receive the support of most GOP elected officials, which matters because they all have a vote in the decision (remember, it’s not just those county chairs and other locally-elected insiders who get to vote on this). The other advantage for Harvey is one that a lot of Republicans we know are seeking above everything else–his name isn’t Dick Wadhams.

When we wrote earlier this month about Wadhams’ decision to run for re-election, we noted that it was likely that Wadhams would not have announced a bid unless he already knew what the result might be. We’ve since learned that we were perhaps giving Wadhams too much credit; there’s a very strong opinion in high-level GOP circles that Wadhams is running for re-election because he has no place else to go. If that’s the case, the Harvey-Wadhams showdown could be a heck of a lot of fun to watch.

Comments

27 thoughts on “Harvey vs. Wadhams, Anyone?

  1. Bartels has updated her post with the info that Harvey would resign his seat if he won. That’s changed from what he said a few weeks ago when word he might run first circulated.

  2. Once again your sources are wrong, Pols. Dick Wadhams doesn’t have a thing to worry about. Ted Harvey is either doing this with Wadhams’ consent, or it’s a name ID builder for a future move up.

    You can keep trying to ascribe circumstances beyond Wadhams’ control to his personal responsibility in an attempt to smear him, but I believe what you fear most is a disciplined party that will let Wadhams be Wadhams. I’m talking about Wayne Allard and John Thune’s Dick Wadhams, not the guy who has spent the last four years struggling against circumstances he never once created.

    And you are right to fear that Dick Wadhams.

    1. Your suggestion Wadhams has anything to do with party discipline is laughable. But your suggestion Wadhams has had absolutely no control over the state GOP’s circumstances is probably about right. That’s the kind of leader this year’s Republicans want, right?

      1. Wadhams cannot control the party rank and file, or the candidates who run for office. Wadhams’ job is to the best he can with the tools he is given, and I believe we can agree that we’ve had a few rather dull tools lately.

        It is only a fool who forgets this man’s moments of greatness under different circumstances. But I haven’t.

        1. For years now

          We’ve since learned that we were perhaps giving Wadhams too much credit…

          can be considered a pretty accurate assessment. He’s become the R Dems hope stays put. We only regret he remained one little percentage point away from going down in history as the GOP Chair whose watch saw his party officially lose major party status and that in a Republican tsunami year and in addition to the Allen fiasco which helped us so much in that year’s US Senate race.  Now that would have made him Colorado Dem’s favorite R ever.

          1. And Pat Waak gets the credit for Bennet and Hickenlooper victories.  The candidates and their staffs had secondary roles.

            Waak’s brilliantly set up McInnis for failure went perfectly.  Her plan for Bennet to target suburban independent and GOP women was genius.

    2. What about George Allen, Bob Schafer, Ken Buck????? Let Wadhams be Wadhams?  I’m laughing my ass off.  Wadhams has always been Wadhams.  Same old, same old.  He never changes, and that’s exactly his problem.  The Democrats have learned a few things since Dick came on the scene.  Dick knew what he knew when he was in the fifth grade.  Hasn’t learned a new thing since.  With that said, I heartily endorse his re-election bid.  Can you say “see Dick’s head explode?”

  3. I am going to seriously have to contemplate switching my affiliation to Unaffiliated.

    He can do everything he wants as far as name recognition goes, he is only electable in Douglas County.  He tried to run for CD6 in a primary against Mike Coffman and got his ass kicked so badly it should have been embarrassing.

    Some guys just don’t get it.  The people do not want extreme right wing zealots.

    Add him into the no-talent ass-clown category that Dan Maes and Scott McInnis belong to…

  4. But I say that WADHAMS wins this

    Dick isnt perfect, but one thing I always appreciated about Dick was that, no matter the county, every GOP Chair felt they could call Dick and get help, at all times

    As a candidate, if I called or emailed Dick, I had a reply within hours

    Ted Harvey? Ted is a nice guy, but he comes off, often, as aloof, carrying a bit of the “I’m the smartest guy in the room, so go screw yourself” attitude – and quite frankly, I don’t see that changing – it’s the biggest reason why he was creamed by both Coffman and Armstrong in CD6, despite being the State Senator from there

    Anyways, I say Dick gets reelected – people want an affable guy as Party Chair that is approachable and returns and calls – and that ain’t Ted Harvey

    1. When I was running as a GOPer for HD56, Senator Greg Brophy ALWAYS made himself available if I needed advice — that was in addition to guys like David Balmer, Mike May, and Jerry Sonnenberg, who were always making themselves available and checking in on me (especially especially Minority Leader Mike May, who became my closest ally and father figure – and for what it is worth, Mike May would make for a phenomenal Chairman)

      Amy Stephens, Mike Kopp, Jim Kerr, Frank McNulty, Josh Penry, Al White and Stella Garza-Hicks also offered help and made themselves available

      I never never never heard from Ted Harvey when I was running – offered no help, offered no advice, and definitely was not outreached towards

      I don’t have anything against Ted Harvey and we’ve become acquaintances since, but if the GOP is going to pick a new Party Chair, I would expect them to pick someone with a history of interfacing – Ted Harvey had his opportunities to help the GOP win seats in the House and Senate and he rarely helped, in those times

      Granted, I’m a proud Democrat now and I really shouldn’t care, but I would like to see both Parties being led by strong leaders (that’s good for Colorado) and if the GOP wants a replacement for Wadhams, there are qualified people available, but Harvey is not on that list

      Lastly – great County Chairmen include Larimer’s Larry Carillo, Boulder’s Scott Starin, JeffCo’s Don Ytterberg, Arapahoe’s Dave Kerber, Douglas’s Mark Baisley, Jannell Reid of Lincoln and Richard Elsner of Park

      If the GOP elects any of the Chairs above as State Chair (or eventually elects them) then the Democrats should take notice — those folks above are excellent organizers, shrewdly intelligent, and very much in touch with their communities – they’d all be ‘dangerous’ State Party Chairs

      And lastly 2 – Tidwell’s old manager John Wagner is VERY VERY capable – his candidate failed him – Wagner is a very good strategist

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

174 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!