U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
December 15, 2010 12:49 AM UTC
10 Comments
Why can’t the House get rid of Gardners? One leaves, another comes in. At least this one will probably be less obnoxious. I wonder if she has a lobbyist look alike to confuse new people, too?
What close observers will notice is that Speaker-Elect Frank McNulty has changed the names of some of the committees because, presumably, the previous names demonstrated insufficient fealty to right-wing ideology. The Health and Human Services committee is now the Health and Environment Committee. The Business and Labor committee is now known as the Economic and Business Development committee.
I see that in all of their years out of power the Colorado GOP still has the maturity of your average 8th grader.
change the names of some committees when they took over six years ago? So what does that say about their maturity level at that time?
I’m not aware that they did and, apparently, you’re not sure of it yourself. Get back to me when you can point to specifics and then I’ll gladly discuss this with you. At this point though I think it says a lot about the Republican philosophy that the words “human services” and “labor” are verboten.
It looks less… political to me, but there were changes.
House Health, Environment, Welfare, and Institutions changed into House Health and Human Services. Seems reasonable.
House Information & Technology went away.
http://www.leg.state.co.us/200…
http://www.leg.state.co.us/Cli…
Regardless of the minor changes, I do agree that McNulty is making a point whereas Romanoff just consolidated the one name. Could just be my partisan eyes though. I have no idea why Info and Tech was absorbed, other than it’s not as prevalent because it’s prevalent to the point of commonplace now.
True, except that the state has had one disastrous software/hardware development project after another. Not only does the Exec Branch need to provide better oversight of these projects (Judicial just does their own thing, so who knows), but the legislature also needs to manage this budgetary mess better.
I know of a certain system that was just set up. Not only are they already out of money to solve any problems, but they also seem to be using the problems as an excuse to delay payments to FY 2011/12. Now I’m suspicious of which problem we actually have.
We could write a bill to fix. It would probably go straight to State Affairs. 😛
Agriculture, Livestock and Drilling
Budget Cutting
Fun With Business
Education and Creationism
Health, Environment and Labor Camps
Sooo, it could’ve been worse.
In the lack of Western Slope representatives on these committees.
I suppose someday we’re going to need to actually elect some people and give the majority something to work with.
Maybe someday…
Are you sure you looked at the right list? Check both the R’s and D’s on House Agriculture – where all the water legislation lives – and where they reside.