U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 21, 2010 06:23 PM UTC

Mindset

  •  
  • by: JO

Off the radar, at least for the moment, is Afghanistan. I really have no clear picture of what either Colorado candidate for the U.S. Senate thinks about our current course here, or how we ought to proceed.

Nevertheless, there is this fact: The cost of posting each U.S. soldier in Afghanistan is $1 million per year. Largely as promised, President Obama followed through on his campaign plank and increased the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan by 30,000. Multiplied by 1,000,000, that seems like a significant sum, even in an age when trillion is the new billion.

Sending more troops is reflective of a long-standing American mindset: Problem? Send guns. Vietnam 1960-73. Lebanon 1982. Grenada 1983. Panama 1989. Iraq 2003. And, of course, Afghanistan 2001. Forgive me if I’ve left some out.

BUT, is there someone reading this who believes, based on some evidence, that (a) the Afghan conflict will last forever and ever; and (b) that U.S. troops will so finally quash not just the Taliban but the idea that spurs the Taliban, that we can declare unambiguously: Guns got the job done.

These thoughts were motivated by Nicholas Kristoff’s column this morning: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10… . One point in particular jumped off the page:

Mr. Mortenson says that $243 million is needed to fund all higher education in Afghanistan this year. He suggests that America hold a press conference here in Kabul and put just 243 of our 100,000 soldiers (each costing $1 million per year) on planes home. Then the U.S. could take the savings and hand over a check to pay for Afghanistan’s universities.

I urge you to follow the link to find out who Mr. Mortenson is and what he has achieved in Afghanistan.

Philosophers who read this site might nod his/her head at the notion that every beginning implies an end. In the case of the United States of America, land that I love, from the mountains to the prairies, to the oceans white with foam, I might nominate December 7, 1941, as the beginning. “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.”

The new day has dawned. Dawned awhile ago, while we weren’t paying attention. We still aren’t paying attention. Wake up, comrades.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

128 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!