CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 20, 2010 07:01 PM UTC
55 Comments
Loading ...
Republicans jumping the fence on this one due to the issue of rape and incest or Buck’s actions relative to rape case – 10% or greater.
Of course this isn’t a scientific poll. Do you really think anyone thinks otherwise?
We’ve been asking the same question every week, just to see how perceptions of the race might be changing. This is just for fun. Relax.
her own unscientific poll of talking to Republican friends.
I made some calls, others have called me (this morning 2 more told me they were going with Bennet)and still others have e-mailed me back and forth.
What’s your problem Colorado Pols? I didn’t disparage anyone or otherwise violate anything but your thin skin….
the Dead Guvs seemed to miss the mark on that comment. Kinda came out of nowhere.
We jumped the gun on that comment. It’s happened many times before where someone says that these polls aren’t scientific. Sorry about that.
I think Ellie was relaying the results of her own unscientific poll, suggesting at least 10 percent of the Republicans she’s sampled are abandoning Buck. Sounds about right.
Four of them had been under votes until Sunday’s interview.
“Shit, Sherlock!”
Thanks for the unscientific but interesting info, Ellie.
Many of my more stout R friends have handily said they will vote for Hick and Bennet.
Or not vote at all.
It says 4 comments, but Ellie’s is the only one I see. Did I miss some mega-pissing match that got somebody banned?
and witty rejoinders to them were all erased.
I have been taped to ColoPols waiting for the inevitable melt-down that will result in the banhammer descending upon Beej, No. 2, Froward, and/or others, and was afraid I’d missed it.
the meltdown will be all on the Democrat side and will occur Nov. 3rd (after a long night of drinking their losses away).
A link would be nice.
is talking about the poll atop this diary. He thinks Democrats are delusional and will be in for a rude awakening.
Celebrating blow jobs and f***ing in every post he makes–BJwilson83
For whatever reason.
in memorium to my witty reply.
infrequent as I may be.
love your siggy btw
I quietly voted Buck last week, but then he drove off a political cliff.
On national television.
But my Unaffiliated mother did.
because Buck thinks being gay is a choice? How would that change his votes in the Senate at all? He was already against gay marriage.
The rape case handling, the Gay=Choice=Alcoholism nonsense, and the no abortion for victims of incest or rape.
She’s a fiscal conservative that leans to the right (voting Tipton over Salazar), but seeing how extreme he is on social issues turned her off in a big way. She’s pro-choice and pro-marriage equality.
She doesn’t have cable and has XM radio in her car, so the Meet The Press youtube clips was the first time she really got a sense of what Buck stands for.
Now I just need a clip of Tipton saying something really offensive and stupid and I’m good to go.
instead of basing their votes off of a biased MTP clip.
By your “analysis,” why should someone care if a Senate candidate was a white-supremacist pederast? “How would that change his votes in the Senate at all?”
Off the top of my head:
(1) Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
(2) Employment Nondiscrimination Act (has majority, unclear if it has 60 votes)
(3) Votes on gay judicial and other nominees (Jesse Helms and others used to vote against anyone gay on the premise they voluntarily engage in immoral behavior)
But c’mon, BJ — you’re a true-blue culture warrior; don’t try to pretend you really think his views on homosexuality don’t matter.
him to repeal DADT before that comment. Although, what does being gay being a choice have to do with it? You could still support repeal of DADT even if you think being gay is a choice.
Troll gets a substantive answer
If you can choose your behavior, it doesn’t warrant protection of the class of people defined by it.
Antonin Scalia in dissent Lawrence v. Texas
Ignoring that discriminatory laws act against what people are pretending it’s just about what they do is the basis of right wing opposition to gay rights.
I vote both.
Celebrating blow jobs and f***ing in every post he makes–BJwilson83
And it isn’t pretty, based on your sig line. You’re doing the very thing you accuse me of doing in it, and worse. I don’t want to hear any more talk of cleaning up posts from you, since you clearly can’t do it yourself.
But I know you’re too stupid to know the difference.
Celebrating blow jobs and f***ing in every post he makes–BJwilson83
It’s in the exact same place as a sig line would be.
It’s in the exact same place as a sig line would be.
And you don’t know what it is, do you;-)
“Celebrating blow jobs and f***ing in every post he makes–BJwilson83”
You can vote provisional. And roll the dice on which vote is counted. Or whether you go to jail for trying to vote twice.
Hey mister, I thought we chased that durn ACORN outta these parts. No more talk of that, hear now?
Clearly not ACORN.
I think that Buck’s supporters are already voting. I think a lot of people are voting. It is not clear to me how much of an election is still left to go. I think that Buck looks awful and Bennet looks surprising good. But, it might be too late.
based on several I’ve talked to.
Because no Republicans are bankers or elite…
Republicans are bankers and/or political elites. caroman says “Republican” and ‘tad wants to know which banker friends.
Commas, they matter.
I think Libby thinks this is a post from Rich Guy.
because of higher Republican crossovers, a big plurality of Independents and a stonger than expected Democratic turnout. Buck’s favorability with Undecideds is 5/42, even though 53% of them voted for McCain.
CANDIDATES MATTER!
Then again, I live in Mesa County.
….because they weren’t inspired. AT ALL.
They see the Dems in Congress are a bunch of candyass, and they’re driven to despair by the depth of stupidity and hostility of the Tea Party.
But because so many people registered to vote for 2008, it’s not going to be that hard to vote this year. If they got a mail-in ballot, they’ll eventually pull it out, color in the lines, and either mail it in or drop it off. If they have to do it the old fashion way, I’m sure they’re not looking forward to it, but they eventually get off the couch and hit the polling places.
They’re not looking forward to it, but they’ll do it. As the Republican’ts continue to implode, I think it’s not going to be Pee-Pee dance time for the Repubs….