CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 27, 2010 01:22 AM UTC

Gallup: Maybe It's Not Just Noise

  • 21 Comments
  • by: Phoenix Rising

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

One week after Gallup reported a significant bump for Democrats in generic ballot approval, their latest poll shows Democrats maintaining much of that bump.

Democrats continue to hold a narrow 48-44 ballot advantage in the poll, perhaps a sign of the recent passage of the financial reform bill.

I was one of those skeptical of last week’s results.  One bump in numbers (as clearly indicated on Gallup’s chart) does not a trend make.  But two such polls in a row is something to note.

Is this a true trend?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

21 thoughts on “Gallup: Maybe It’s Not Just Noise

  1. Stories like the ones out of Colorado influence national opinions and are far sexier than a 2300 page bill that relocates the office of thrift supervision, clarifies the boundaries between the CFTC and SEC, and calls for swaps to be exchange traded with certain exceptions.

    Dodd-Frank is important, without a doubt, but its rhetorical and polling impact had already been figured into the total by the time that it was signed.

    1. Not that I mind that a lot, since it seems Republicans are falling over themselves to Go For The Crazy this year, and dragging along the scandal baggage they’ve been plagued with in recent years to boot.

      If this is true, then the more Democrats expose the Tea Party as a branch of the Republican Party, or the more the Teabaggers and GOP fight it out, the more upside Democrats will see as we enter the general election season.

      1. The best we can do is to expose the crazies and cause Independents to give up on the political process this year. Then it’ll be up to the base to show up. That being said, if the Dems can hammer on the wedge issues between the crazies and institutional R’s we’ll survive the tsunami  of “no plan” “just say no” “lower taxes will solve everything” folks.  

  2. Gallup had another poll that they’ve been doing since January of this year, on voter identification.

    Colorado is the single most competitive state in the country by voter self-identification.  The state has, essentially, a split voter base (like we didn’t know that).

    So – even self-identification, plus a slight generic ballot advantage to Dems…  To me this equals Really Close Races, especially in CO-04.

  3. …which has been gradually declining since about May.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/122

    If economic confidence were rising, I’d see a reason for people starting to prefer Dems more. It’s not. So, if this bump for Dems is real, Reps have only themselves to blame. As Parsing pointed out above: Republicans are falling over themselves to Go For The Crazy this year.

    It’ll be interesting to see what happens after the primaries, whether R’s can believably move to the center without alienating and de-motivating their base.

    1. appear in the states that have had their primaries and it just hasn’t happened. If it isn’t happening in Nevada, California, South Carolina, etc what makes you think it will happen here? I know it’s fun to think we’re somehow special, but we’re just a micro of the greater macro.

      I actually hope I’m wrong. The only way our system of government truly works is when we have some center Dems & Repubs who can hash out legislation introduced by the progressives and neocons. We NEED those moderates and need to stop being ashamed of them in both parties. I actually wish we had a nice viable third party to play that role.

      1. We NEED those moderates and need to stop being ashamed of them in both parties

        It’s obvious to those on the left that the wacko far-right’s cannibalization of the Marosticas of the Republican party damages both their own and the national (or state’s) interests. But it’s not obvious to those on the far-left that their own cannibalization of our own party’s moderates is equally destructive to their own and the national interests. Instead, they resort to the same rhetoric employed by their uncompromising counterparts on the right, with the same effect on our collective ability to actually make some progress.

        The quote on today’s open thread is by the Czech author and statesman Vaclav Havel. His countryman Milan Kundera wrote in The Unbearable Lightness of Being, commenting on a protest in France, “don’t they know that the raised fists are the problem?”

        It’s not that there’s never a time to take a stand, or that it’s never necessary to “raise fists” to do it; rather, it’s the ease and constancy with which it is done, the quick recourse to division over unity, the emotional resistance to mutual accomodation and compromise, whether within a political party, a nation, or the world as a whole, that is so counterproductive.

  4. I don’t like them when Republicans are winning, and I don’t like them when Democrats are winning.

    They mean nothing.  Everybody hates someone else’s representative.  All that matters is how they feel about their own.

    1. It is funny that when they do those generic Congressional polls everybody wants to throw them all out but then when they ask about their own reps they get amazingly different results.  The ultimate example of all politics are local. They hate em all but their rep spoke at the High School, or the Rotary club, etc. etc. so they are OK.

  5. Kevin Drum talked about this last week,


    It turns out that the Democratic surge is largely due to a sudden jump in support from independents. So what caused that? Well, I was struck by an unusual correspondence between two of Gallup’s charts. It turns out that whenever enthusiasm goes up among registered Republicans, preference for Republicans goes down among independents. The pasted-together chart below – it’s a little messy I’m afraid – shows five cases of a jump in Republican enthusiasm (top chart) along with the corresponding drop in Republican support among independents (bottom chart). It’s not a perfect correlation, but it’s a pretty good one.

    http://motherjones.com/kevin-d

  6. The first data point in the graf, I gather in March, showed Dems ahead of GOP 47-44.

    The last data point, in July, showed Dems ahead of GOP 48-44.

    Is that a “trend”? Or is that a variation within the margin of error of the poll? Do variations from week to week of 3 or 4 points comprise “significant bumps”? There are variations that could have both parties claiming bumps — Republicans at end of June (49-43), Democrats a month later (48-44). Something to get excited about on either side?

    Possibly not.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

201 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!