WTF: Bizarre Sullivan Recall Launch Confounds Colorado Politics

UPDATE #2: The Denver Post’s Justin Wingerter:

The Republican who lost his seat last year to Democratic state Rep. Tom Sullivan said Tuesday that he does not support efforts to recall Sullivan over the recently passed red-flag bill.

Cole Wist’s remarks came a day after paperwork was filed with the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office that allows Sullivan’s critics to begin collecting signatures. Sullivan, of Centennial, has been a vocal gun control proponent since his son, Alex, died in the Aurora theater shooting.


UPDATE: Former GOP Rep. Cole Wist, who lost in 2018 to Rep. Tom Sullivan after Rocky Mountain Gun Owners turned on him, denounces the recall attempt:

This is truly a remarkable moment in Colorado politics.


GOP operative Tyler Sandberg slams RMGO.

We’re less than 24 hours into the attempted recall of freshman Rep. Tom Sullivan of Centennial by Kristi Burton Brown, the vice-chair of the Colorado Republican Party and longtime ally of the Neville family of politicians and operatives–who are in turn closely linked with the Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, the hard-right single-issue advocacy group with a reputation for bloodying fellow Republicans in pursuit of caucus unity.

But by far most notable about yesterday’s oddly low-key launch is the highly visible and public lack of Republican consensus on initiating this recall attempt–with the substantial wing of the party not aligned with RMGO denouncing the group, the Nevilles, and the hit on Rep. Sullivan. Colorado Public Radio:

“Recalls can identify people, but it also can strengthen elected officials that survive them. The long-term strategy has to be to win November elections,” said Republican political consultant Michael Fields, who heads Colorado Rising Action.

Former GOP chairman Ryan Call said initiating recalls is “a dramatic departure from the historic role and practice of the Republican party in Colorado.” He added that the party historically gets behind recall efforts if there’s malfeasance or if someone in public office is acting in a way that doesn’t align with campaign pledges, which he doesn’t see as the case here.

“We have seen a pretty significant shift in public policy under single-party control of state government, but Democrats are pretty much governing how they promised they would,” [Pols emphasis] Call said. “Voters may have hoped for a more balanced and bipartisan approach, but what we saw during the legislative session is consistent with what most Democratic candidates said they would do while they were running.”

Ernest Luning of the Colorado Springs Gazette confirmed RMGO’s eager involvement in his story today, which anyone with knowledge of Kristi Burton Brown’s ties with the Neville political machine could already have surmised:

Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a hard-line Second Amendment advocacy group, is committed to help Kristi Brown oust Sullivan, said Dudley Brown, executive director of RMGO.

“I welcome any group that wants to jump in on it,” Kristi Brown said. “A lot of Colorado parents in my district are upset with Rep. Sullivan and the way he voted.”

The response to yesterday’s news that Rep. Sullivan would be the next Democrat targeted for recall, especially the unenthusiastic response from fellow Republicans, underscores a longstanding divide between the Neville/RMGO axis anchored by Minority Leader Patrick Neville and the rest of the Republican establishment in the state. The recent exposure of highly questionable management of the 2018 House campaigns managed by the Nevilles, which resulted in the smallest GOP House minority in decades, has put the once-formidable political dynasty on the defensive–enough so that they were given a dubious welcome at best when they arrived to “help” with the now-defunct recall campaign against Rochelle Galindo.

But more importantly, going after Tom Sullivan, whose powerful backstory inspires both personal sympathy and support for his agenda of reducing gun violence, is politically hazardous to the point of being totally inexplicable. We’ve talked to a number of smart people on both sides of the aisle, and literally no one can understand why RMGO would start with Rep. Sullivan, kick off the campaign against Sullivan without other targets among which to distribute the backlash–and above all let the news break with no attempt to control the message. To say this is not how you’re supposed to do things is an understatement, and we’re left wondering if they simply didn’t care how it looks to the outside world.

Either way, there is a bipartisan consensus following yesterday’s news that a recall of Rep. Sullivan would be a grave mistake–both objectively for our state’s politics, and politically for Republicans. And that is something we did not expect to see, at least not so quickly and so openly. After years of struggling for dominance within the GOP, the overreach of this recall attempt could represent the beginning of the end for the Nevilles and RMGO.

28 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Conserv. Head Banger says:

    Does all this hoopla over recalls and the red-flag issue imply that RMGO doesn’t care about mental health issues?

  2. bullshit! says:

    Dudley's outside his comfort zone, friendly fire on Republicans. This IS gonna backfire, and RMGO will once again help Democrats win.

  3. doremi says:

    Unfortunately, Tyler Sandberg is incorrect.

    The recall against Evie Hudak was totally run by RMGO.

    Although it didn't go to the ballot, because Sen. Hudak resigned. It was believed that RMGO had sufficient signatures for a vote to be held.  Hudak fell on her sword for the party.   Seeing how the two previous recall votes had turned out, it would have been a tough go if an election were held and the State Senate would have changed parties midway through the 2014 session.

    • Gilpin Guy says:

      That was then.  This is now.  Five years and more blood of innocents shed as human sacrifices on the alter of Gun Idolatry has changed things.  Gun regulation advocates aren't cowed anymore by the traitorous NRA or Dudley.  Bring it on bitches.

  4. PodestaEmails says:

    Everyone is sorry for Tom Sullivan's loss. But our constitutional rights matter more than any one person, or even a million people. Without our rights we are nothing, and without our right to self defense we're not Americans.

    Sorry, but Sullivan has to pay for what he did.

    • Davie says:

      So now you're shilling for Dudley Brown too?  Jeez Poddy, you are living proof that "Just when you think Republicans have hit rock bottom, you discover there is no bottom"

    • unnamed says:

      He has to pay for doing exactly what he said he would do when he ran for office?  

      Funny how the only "rights" your party cares about are the "rights" of insane assholes to have unfettered access to augmented penises, er. I mean, really big guns.  

      Though, it isn't really about guns, is it Poddy Mouth?  Recall attempts will be as effective at repealing "Red Flag" as they were at repealing the 2013 laws.  Your fascist party just need a way to gain power in this state, because you can't win regular elections.  You want a do-over for the fact that the Fascist Republicreeps got their asses handed to them last fall.  To quote you:

      Fuck off sore losers!!

    • Mike W. says:

      Ya'll heard it here folks: Poddy values his toys more than a million human lives. Suppose genocidal maniac would be the appropriate term then?

    • Gilpin Guy says:

      “Sullivan has to pay for what he did.”

      Is this not the weirdest, most insane sentence ever written at Pols.

      No you craven coward, Tom Sullivan doesn't have to pay for what he did.

    • MADCO says:

      Other places have a law that says when a gun owner's gun is stolen and then used to commit a crime, the gun owner is just as liable as the gun thief.

      Four different federal courts have ruled it fits and is not a violation of the 2A.
      It's all about personal responsibility, right?

      Locking it up can mitigate the penalty.

      We should have that.

  5. mamajama55 says:

    The only reason they're picking Sullivan to recall is his location – he happens to represent the district where Kristi Brown and Brenda Stokes live in Arapahoe County. Since both those two women are indebted to the Nevilles, they are going to start "at home".

    Brenda Stokes runs #DecideColorado , a social media / online store business now in charge of circulating the Sullivan recall petitions. Stokes is the vice-chair of the Arapahoe Republican Party.

    Kristi Burton-Brown is the registered agent for the ironically-named "Colorado Moms Who Care", which received more than $100,000 in support from Neville PACS last year (from Values for Colorado and Rearden Strategies).  The "Moms" spent the money to propagandize against Democratic candidates all over the state in the 2018 elections.

    Kristi Burton Brown is the vice chair of the Colorado Republican Party.




    • Awen says:

      Slight correction, MJ: Colorado Moms Who Care took in $117,000, almost all of it from Values First (Joe Neville run 527). Moms Who Care spent almost all of that (all but $674) on advertising done by…Rearden Strategic. Nice way to route all that money back into the Neville pockets.

  6. Davie says:

    Mike Littwin, as usual, has a great column on this topic.  I really like his opening line too

    I didn’t know how things could possibly get worse for Colorado Republicans after their disastrous showing in the 2018 midterms, but I guess I underestimated them.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.