CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 27, 2019 08:37 AM UTC

Gardner Still Wants to Kill "Command-And-Control" Obamacare, But Doesn't Offer a Replacement Plan

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

President Trump and Sen. Cory Gardner.

Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner doubled down yesterday on his longstanding opposition to Obamacare, saying the national health insurance law has “failed” without offering a concrete plan to replace it.

Gardner’s comments, delivered on KNUS 710-AM’s Steffan Tubbs show, came as the Trump Administration announced yesterday that it will not defend Obamacare in court.

“We need to have Republicans and [laughs] Democrats recognize that the Affordable Care Act failed,” said Gardner when asked by Tubbs what he thought the latest GOP effort to kill the Affordable Care Act.

As part of his evidence for this, Gardner cited the discredited figure that “hundreds of thousands of Coloradans had their insurance plans canceled” due to Obamacare.

In a fact check of a campaign ad citing those numbers, then 9News political reporter Brandon Rittiman pointed out that “it’s true that millions of people with individual coverage got cancellation notices because their old plans didn’t meet the standards of Obamacare…. But getting one of these notices is not the same thing as losing insurance.”

Gardner is apparently trying to make people think all these people lost their insurance, which is not the case. In fact, renewals were offered to the vast majority of people whose policies were canceled, and new policies were offered to all.

Gardner cited actions that could be taken to replace Obamacare.

“Let’s find a way to bring down the cost of health care, increase the quality of health care,” Gardner told Tubbs. “We can do that by expanding the risk pools, by expanding access to different policies of insurance. We allowing insurance to be sold across state lines. We can do it by creating association health plans. There’s so many different things that could be done–and not in a command-control kind of environment.”

But Gardner hasn’t put specific words on paper that can actually be discussed and analyzed and that add up to a plan to replace Obamacare, the various repeals of which could throw 20 million Americans off the health insurance rolls, including 12 million low-income people, according to independent analysts.

Even without an agreed-upon replacement plan, Republicans, led by Gardner in the U.S. Senate, tried three times — and failed — to kill Obamacare, the last effort ending with the downward thumb of former Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

In yesterday’s interview, as well as most instances where he talks about health care, Gardner references his aspiration that Democrats and Republicans work together to solve health care problems.

But he doesn’t appear to even take himself seriously when he says this, laughing as he says it: “We need to have Republicans and [laughs] Democrats recognize that the Affordable Care Act failed.”

If Gardner is serious about working with Democrats–especially now that Republicans have tried for seven years to kill Obamacare and failed even when they had the power in Washington to do so–why doesn’t he work across the aisle to try to fix the national health care law, instead of killing it?

A call to Gardner’s office with that question was not returned.

Text of Gardner’s March 27 appearance on KNUS:

“Look, here’s what we need to do. We need to have Republicans and [laughs] Democrats recognize that the Affordable Care Act failed. The promises that were made by President Obama that, if you liked your health care you could keep your health care, reduce the case of health care by $2,000 for a family of four, are simply not true. Hundreds of thousands of Coloradans had their insurance plans canceled. We’ve seen dramatic cost increases. And whether it’s government mandating that you do this, whether its government policies, what we know is it simply did not meet the promises it was sold on.

So, let’s get together. Let’s find a way to bring down the cost of health care, increase the quality of health care. We can do that by expanding the risk pools, by expanding access to different policies of insurance. We allowing insurance to be sold across state lines. We can do it by creating association health plans. There’s so many different things that could be done–and not in a command-control kind of environment.

The Democrats want, and they are no longer bashful about this, they universal health care. They want socialized medicine. This may have been the first step toward that. I don’t think that’s what the American people want. What we need to do is come together with policies to fix this problem.”

Tweet
Share

Comments

14 thoughts on “Gardner Still Wants to Kill “Command-And-Control” Obamacare, But Doesn’t Offer a Replacement Plan”

  1. Someone should ask Gardner what a health plan would need to do in order to be successful for all (or even nearly all) Americans.  And then ask how ANY of his plans measure up on HIS standards.

    Under the current mal-Administration, agency plans are allowed — and even the Secretary responsible for them says they might sell a million or two over the next 5 years.

    Selling across state lines is fine — as long as there is a recognition of meeting industry standards AND the minimum of the ACA's national standards.  Why doesn't he write that up as legislation?  Commonwealth Fund analysis of the move says "Selling Health Insurance Across State Lines Is Unlikely to Lower Costs or Improve Choice."  Empirically, Georgia allowed interstate sales starting in 2011 — no health insurer took advantage of the option.

     

    2.  “We can do that by expanding the risk pools, by expanding access to different policies of insurance. We are allowing insurance to be sold across state lines. We can do it by creating association health plans.

      I was going to ask which part of the above quote is disallowed under the ACA?

  2. Will bone spurs be considered a pre-existing condition?  Just how inept does one have to be to still be yapping about Repeal and Replace 10 years after the legislation passed – with no real plan? 

    1. “Would you buy a used tractor from this man?” . . .

      (Rhetorical)

       

      Actually, this is more like, “Pay me for a tractor today (. . . and I’ll gladly deliver one some day, maybe, if I ever take the time to learn and figure out how to build one?).”

      1. He can drive one, for sure. The family's been in the tractor business for years, and is well respected in Yuma, according to people I talk with.  Also, I hear that the parents are FDR Democrats (as was Cory when he was young).

        Watch Cory drive a tractor past constituents screaming for his attention in the 4th of July parade. At 3:59 in the video.

  3. Since we don't talk about them as much, here are some of the things that Cory Gardner is working hard to eliminate from your coverage.  These are all products of the ACA that aren't about just getting insurance.

    • Prohibiting insurance companies from rescinding coverage.  They used to go back and find your undeclared severe acne and rescind your coverage while you were in cancer treatment.
    • Eliminating lifetime limits on insurance coverage.  Anyone worried about that $1 million lifetime limit after a major health crisis?
    • Eliminating annual limits on insurance coverage.  Ever bought a "cheap plan" for emergencies only to find out it will only pay out 10 grand a year in benefits?
    • Annual out of pocket maximums.  Had open heart surgery?  Even though it's still an insane level of cost, it helps to know you won't pay more than, say, $7,500, for the whole thing.  Plus, free prescriptions for the rest of the year!
    • Providing free preventive care.
    • Extending coverage for young adults to age 26.
    • Allowing states to cover more people on medicaid.  Know anyone poor but not "poor enough?"
    • Seniors who reach the coverage gap ("donut hole") will receive a 50 percent discount when buying Medicare Part D covered brand-name prescription drugs. Over the next 10 years, seniors will receive additional savings on brand-name and generic drugs until the coverage gap is closed in 2020.  Sorry, Meemaw.
    • Prohibiting discrimination due to pre-existing conditions or gender.  You can just not get sick or be a woman of child bearing age, I suppose.
    • Ensuring coverage for individuals participating in clinical trials.  Sorry you didn't get access to that promising new wonder-drug, Bryan.

    1. Nice list, Pseudonymous … I'm sure Cory will join with his Republican caucus and get us a fine plan … one where you can keep your doctor (if you can afford to pay him or her out-of-pocket and wait for an insurance company to reimburse). All we'll need to do is work through the helpful manual of medical coding to make certain the company knows what they should pay, right?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

100 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!