U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 01, 2010 08:43 PM UTC

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY): New tax cuts for the wealthy and big businesses

  •  
  • by: CoalCreekWildfire

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) is proposing a tax cut that benefits big businesses and high-wage employees. He proposes a Payroll Tax Holiday for “any private-sector employer” that is not “biased toward either low-wage or high-wage workers.” (1)

Any private-sector employer that hires a worker who had been unemployed for at least 60 days will not have to pay its 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax on that employee for the duration of 2010.”

“This proposal is not biased toward either low-wage or high-wage workers… a business saves 6.2 percent on both a $40,000 worker and a $90,000 worker.”

Why level the playing field with equal rules for the big and small, rich and poor?

“… the jobs credit that existed in the late 1970s was of limited success, and it was excruciatingly complicated. Recalling this experience, members of Congress from both parties have been lukewarm to such a credit, and the idea was dropped from the stimulus package last year.” (1)

Simple rules are easier to implement, less risky, and more likely to be adopted by small businesses quickly. They are also cheaper:

“[If] three million unemployed workers were to be hired… the gross cost of the Social Security tax cut and the additional credit would be only $7.6 billion.

And that’s before we consider the offsets from income and payroll taxes paid by these workers.”

That’s $2,500 per job.

Compare that to $1,313,620 per job for the Stimulus Program. (2)

“Recipients of economic-stimulus money said 599,108 workers were being paid by the funds in the last quarter of 2009…

The recipients’ reports, published on the official government Web site recovery.gov late Saturday, are likely to fuel further controversy over the impact of the $787 billion package…”

1) Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) and Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), A Payroll Tax Break for Jobs, New York Times Opinion Section, 1/26/2010 (viewed 1/31/2010 18:12 MT) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01…

2) Louise Radnofsky and Corey Boles, Latest Stimulus Report Fuels Jobs Pressure, WSJ, 2/1/2010 7:55 AM (viewed 2/1/2010 10:31 AM MT) http://on.wsj.com/cTkbp4

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

66 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!