U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) David Seligman

50%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Milat Kiros

90%

10%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(R) H. Scheppelman

(D) Alex Kelloff

70%

30%

10%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

70%

30%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Shannon Bird

45%↓

30%

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 20, 2010 08:24 PM UTC

The Independence Party

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Vincent Lynn

Progressives are upset with Democrats, Conservatives are upset with Republicans, Independents are upset with both sides and no one likes Josh McDaniels.  These are the truths of the political scene in early 2010.  

Mainstream skepticism of politics is not a new phenomenon by any means, but the skepticism is usually reserved for one party or the other.  Right now, no party is getting it right if approval ratings are any indicator http://www.gallup.com/poll/123…  

The Tea Party movement has tapped into the growing number of Conservatives who are upset with Republicans, but who would also never vote for a Democrat.  However, this has largely been an effort to make Republican candidates more conservative rather than running as a completely different party.  

The liberals have yet to find an outlet for their disappointment in Democratic leadership.  Here in Colorado you could say that Andrew Romanoff’s primary challenge to Michael Bennett in the senate is the liberal counter to the Tea Party.  From early polling, it is obvious that this movement does not have nearly the organization or sense of urgency that the Tea Party has been able to muster.

Last, the middle of the road independents have no place to turn to vent their anger.  Although conservatives are upset with Republicans, the Republicans are by no means middle of the road.  The same can be said for the Democrats in office.

So what is the point of airing all of these mostly self-evident truths?  The environment is right for legitimate third and fourth parties to emerge.  

It is hard to run against the Democratic and Republican machines, but recent polls have the Tea Party’s popularity higher than the Republican Party.  If the goal was to have a seperate party, the Tea Party could realistically split the Republican Party in half.  This would of course result in losing elections versus a united Democratic front, but the Democratic front is anything but united.

The country would be better off if the Tea Party came to resemble a true political party, rather than a GOP PAC.  This would provide the opportunity for both a liberal and a middle of the road political party to emerge without the risk of sacrificing the better for the perfect.  

Everyone likes an underdog and no one likes Democrats or Republicans…seems to be a golden opportunity waiting for someone to pick it up.  Naming rights are still available for both new parties, but please, no sexual innuendos this time.    

Comments

8 thoughts on “The Independence Party

  1. but he stinks.  Don’t get me wrong, getting rid of Cutler was a good decision, but everything other decision has been either terrible or mediocre.  

  2. when Sarah Palin told Glenn Beck she thought our current two-party system was fine and the guy who makes his living ranting and raving against both parties let the comment slide.

    I don’t know anyone who thinks a 2-party system is good for America. But I don’t know anyone who has a clue how to fix it either.

    1. I think it really is like going up against Coke and Pepsi.  If you are Snapple, or Vitamin Water, or Sprite (assuming it wasn’t owned by Coke) you would have a very viable product in the market place.  Now, you wouldn’t be able to compete nationally against the marketing and distribution of the big two, but you could start locally and pick up regions at a time.  Hopefully, you don’t get bought out by one of the big 2 though (or maybe you do hope for that…)

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

232 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols