U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 11, 2010 07:38 PM UTC

Net Neutrality

  •  
  • by: MADCO

net neutrality

paraphrased from Wikipedia

principle that advocates the Internet have no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed…  if a user pays for a certain level of Internet access, and another user pays for a given level of access, that the two users should be able to connect to anything on the internet at the subscribed level of access

Some arguments for and against

http://www.google.com/search?h…

And a chance for you and all of you friends to comment to the FCC.

Dear Friend,

Big telecoms would like to inspect and filter the Internet content you

access, block Web sites and applications they don’t like, and overcharge

you for using the Web. But the net neutrality rules proposed by the

Federal Communications Commission would prevent them from doing that.

The public comment period for these rules ends on Thursday, and the phone

and cable companies and their phony front groups have already flooded the

FCC with comments objecting to net neutrality.

We need you to speak up because there has been an all-out lobbying effort

by the telecommunications industry to kill net neutrality. Even before the

FCC proposed their rules, 18 Senators (all Republicans) sent a letter to

the FCC opposing net neutrality. One Republican senator even announced an

effort to prevent the FCC from spending funds to enforce the new rules

once they go into effect. Separately, 72 House Democrats sent their own

letter to the FCC opposing net neutrality rules.

I just wrote a personal letter to the FCC explaining why I support net

neutrality. Please join me by clicking on the link below before the

comment period ends on January 14.

http://act.credoaction.com/cam…  

This was almost discussed recently on CoPols.com

http://coloradopols.com/diary/…

But it’s a big deal – imagine if Comcast decided that CoPols.com was just too much bandwidth to allow Comcast users to get here. ANd instead directed us to the MSNBC.com posting section when Comcast users tried to get here.  I pay for bandwidth not help in deciding how to use that bandwidth.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!