(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
40%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
55%↓
45%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews asks, “what does that even mean?”
This is starting to get interesting, folks. We’ve been clear as to why we think Jane Norton is making an effort to appeal to the “Tea Party” contingent of newly-energized Republicans. But there’s a difference between a few red-meat affectations to make the hardcore base happy and what Norton is doing: from ‘abolishing’ the Department of Education, to placidly standing by while “Tea Partiers” assert all kinds of abominable things in her presence–and now this latest “terrorist rights” gem–Norton is either dreadfully overcompensating for the conservative angst her campaign initially met with…or she’s the next Michele Bachmann.
Either way, Norton can only be trotted out on national TV as a joke so many times before the question of the voters she wins over with this extreme rhetoric–as opposed to the much larger percentage she loses–becomes quite urgent for her.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments