U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) David Seligman

50%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson (D) A. Gonzalez (R) Sheri Davis
50%↑ 40%↓ 30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Milat Kiros

90%

10%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(R) H. Scheppelman

(D) Alex Kelloff

70%

30%

10%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

70%

30%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Shannon Bird

45%↓

30%↓

30%

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 17, 2009 04:41 PM UTC

Thursday Open Thread

  • 61 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Criticism is something we can avoid easily by saying nothing, doing nothing, and being nothing.”

–Aristotle

Comments

61 thoughts on “Thursday Open Thread

      1. Not being a Republican, I had to go to the internet and CNN provided few links to positive stories regarding GOP plans.  Therefore I found these….

        The GOP healthcare bill that was killed by Pelosi, Markey, et al.

        http://rules-republicans.house

        I know you view healthcare from the sole perspective of just what new big government program can we create to make the outcomes equal for all the people.  Sorry life isn’t fair, but you’re welcome to keep trying with mandates and tax increases.

        GOP has a better plan to create jobs

        http://www.miamiherald.com/opi

        During a meeting at the White House this week, House Republican leaders presented President Obama with a plan to create jobs and get our economy moving again.

        As with all opeds you’re limited in the amount of words you can offer.  I’m just shocked that CNN has failed to report on the Jobs meeting that POTUS had with GOP leaders.

      2. The original party of No….

        Throughout the past year, Pelosi has demanded that Democrats unanimously oppose g.o.p. bills. By denying the g.o.p votes from across the aisle, Democrats have forced moderate Republicans to back bills like those cutting Medicaid and other social programs that fiscally conservative Republicans have insisted on, votes for which Democrats have then attacked moderate Republicans in television ads. Pelosi has also ordered Democrats not to work on bills or even hold press conferences with Republicans whom the party is trying to defeat in November.

        1. The article is from August 2006, when Republicans had controlling majorities in the House, Senate and Presidency…..and had since 1994. Their policies were leading the country into a Great Recession and near economic collapse, two unpaid for wars, and a severe diminuition of our civil rights.

          That was the time to say no, and for good reasons.

          Now, trying to pull this country back from the brink of economic ruin, restore some credibility on the world stage, battle enormously significant environmental problems ignored under Republican leadership, is no time for political bickering and partisanship.

          And “Tad”, an article written by Boehner harly impresses me. That article you cite has absolutely no specifics or credibility. It’s compleely worthless.

          1. That dog doesn’t hunt.  I could just as easily say that the Republicans need to do whatever they can to prevent Obama and the Dems from doing worse.

            We have a difference of opinion, but I think it’s dishonest to act like the Dems didn’t do exactly what the R’s are doing now.

            1. You can easily say whatever you easily want. The fact is that the Democrats were united attempting to prevent ruin, and the Repubs are united against trying to fix what they broke.

            2. … keep in mind how the Dems worked with Bush and the GOP to pass No Child Left Behind, and only got themselves shut out of the process once they got what they wanted.

              You reap what you sow, and ‘pubs can thank themselves for the current attrition.

  1. Why should I belong to a political party?  Not sure WHO the democrats or republicans represent- but I know it is not my family, myself or my small business….

    1. It’s the COPols party of common sense.

      It’s the party where all problems can be solved in black and white (and blue with the links).

      It’s the party that encourages free thinking assisted by libations after work.

      Come, join us….

      1. I think I’m going to form the democratic libertarian party.  Here is the platform:

        *EVERY new program needs to be paid for. No unfunded mandates, no deficit spending (as much as possible- I get emergency deficits but I DON’T accept deficits because elected officials are chickenshits!)

        *Get off my property.

        *Get out of my gun closet.

        *Get out of my bedroom.

        *Keep schools PUBLIC, but get creative with public school programs.  An aside- ALL teachers should be educated like lawyers, tested like lawyers and paid like lawyers.

        *Have a public option for healthcare.  The BEST way to get the competition needed for lowering costs.

        *promote competitive re-districting.

        *legalize pot and tax the holy hell out of it!

        *promote getting off oil-based fuels as fast as possible.

        *increase tax for war effort.

        Any other planks?

  2. By Pete Harrison and Markus Wacket

    COPENHAGEN (Reuters)

    (snip)

    “The news that we’ve been receiving is not good,” Chancellor Angela Merkel told the German parliament. “I must say very honestly, that the United States offer to cut emmissions by 4 percent compared to 1990 levels is not ambitious.”

      1. a single glance at the opening line tells me it’s a Libertad rant.  I think we should have a contest to see who can guess when it’s something from Libertad in the fewest words.  Kind of like name that tune.

          1. was one of the easy give aways.  And then there is always “rouge”.  But it’s pretty easy even without spelling or grammatical errors. Everybody let’s a few of those slip by once in a while.  No.  It’s a certain Je ne sais quoi.  Although I think I do kind of sais. It must be the random talking points with no logical connection to any point that Tad somehow manages to signal in the very first few words.  

      2. It’s too bad nobody ever taught Christy how to do real stats.  Or maybe he had one of his grad students do that and didn’t check it himself.  Either way, I’d love to hear him explain to an AGU audience with a straight face how that low pass with unconstrained tails comes anywhere close to fitting the data.

        And since you have no idea where this data even came from, ‘Christy’ is John Christy, who runs a climate lab at UA Huntsville and has long been a climate skeptic unable to back up his ‘hunches’ with real data analysis.  AGU is the American Geophysical Union, currently holding its annual meeting in San Francisco with 12,000 participants, at least 2000-3000 of whom are doing climate research.  (But they’re all part of the liberal conspiracy, so you can ignore them.  OTOH, if there were that many cancer researchers meeting up and all saying the same thing, I bet you’d listen.)  

  3. GJ Sentinel Columnist is expressing amazement, having apparently just learned that human beings produce waste.  Something about the EPA regulating greenhouse gases–since it is just mind-boggling to image human’s produce anything waste-like…

    It should also be obvious that the propagation of more polluting organic subsystems (human beings) should be slowed or perhaps halted and the remaining population encouraged to remain still and breathe as shallowly as possible.

    Actually, the people who should remain still and breathe as little as possible are the politicians who are trying to use this rapidly melting mumbo jumbo to redistribute wealth and reach the Holy Grail of Collectivism – control of the means of production.

    As far as the settled science canard on global warming goes, it’s not only incorrect, it would hardly be a recommendation. It was settled science a few hundred years ago that if you didn’t feel well you had too much blood and it would perk you right up to have your barber open a vein while he was giving you the newest hairdo.

    …If you think these tactics won’t have an impact on our life in Western Colorado, just refer back to the recent story of the EPA looking into emissions from natural gas extraction and guess the direction that’s headed.

    Today’s waste of ink by Grand Junction’s noble barrister, Rick Wagner.  

  4. One critical problem that the Puzzle Palace has had since OIF is that most senior planners dismiss the Iraqi’s as a bunch of ignorant ragheads. They seem to forget it was one of the more educated, secular societies in Southwest Asia.

    So it doesn’t surprise me when A-Q and the insurgency in Iraq (and maybe AFPAK) has figured out how to hack our drones….

    Iraqi Militants Hack $4.5m Predator Drones With Windows Shareware

    Today, in terrifying things about the world: Iraqi militants have been able to intercept video feeds from the Predator surveillance drones with a simple Windows app. To rephrase, an iconic symbol of our military superiority can be foiled for $26.

    The software, as far as I can tell, is a simple data-leeching utility. With a satellite dish and a few parameters (Packet IDs and transponder codes, which you can evidently scan for) you can tap into downstream data feeds, and essentially recording whatever data is transmitted to (specific) other users on a satellite network. How the insurgents got the proper parameters for predator drone, I have no idea-but apparently it’s not that hard.

    http://gizmodo.com/5428716/mil

    If the senior military officials running our wars are still stuck thinking that we’re so far advanced that we don’t have to worry about basic signal security, then we need to pack it up now.

      1. This from the Huffpo article:

        The hacking was possible because the remotely flown planes have an unprotected communications link.

        The Defense Department has addressed the issue, first discovered a year ago, by working to encrypt all its drone video feeds from Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, the defense official said.

        Another quality product brought to you by beltway bandits.

  5. Is Pols taking ideas for fair elections?  Well, even if they are not, here’s one.  Why not give previous FPE’s a weighted edge in voting.  PFPE’s could do their voting after we unwashed do.  They would be charged with taking the peasants wishes in to account but if there was an appearance of shenanigans,  they could vote their conscience.  Just a thought.  And the FPE’s really do deserve something for all their efforts.  

    Oh, sheeeet, lol…that might not work if they all run for FPE again.  Well, in that case, their vote only counts the same as the hayseed vote.

    But maybe we should take a vote on giving up power, first?  Okay, now critique the idea.

    1. just have an open (non-anonymous) election and only ‘regular’ commenters (however you want to define it) get to vote, but have to vote openly in a comment

    1. and some polar bears left (don’t recall anyone of those lousy hippy global warming nuts claiming the ice is all gone and polar bears are already extinct) that proves what?

        1. I don’t doubt the authenticity of the photo, it’s just that it doesn’t tell us anything, other than the fact that polar bears are curious and fearless.

          The big issue with arctic sea ice is that the multi-year ice is disappearing. What we’re left with is seasonal ice that forms and melts every year. Since open water absorbs most of the solar energy that hits it, while sea ice reflects most of the solar energy that hits it, the loss of multi-year sea ice is a powerful positive feedback in global warming.

          And submarines don’t surface through multi-year ice, only first-year ice.  

            1. Even with a warmer climate. And it’s thick enough to walk on. The whole issue with sea ice is whether or not it melts in the summer.

              Here’s what we need to worry about:

    2. The photo isn’t copyrighted, since it’s a U.S. Navy photo and those are in the public domain,

      However, if used, credit should be “U.S. Navy photo by [photographer’s name]”

      This photo was taken by Chief Yeoman Alphonso Braggs, US-Navy, and it first appeared in this release: http://www.news.navy.mil/view_

      Ironically, the sub was collecting data on global warming.

      1. My brother was one of the nuclear reactor operators on the USS Honolulu during that voyage.  I guess they had been under water for quite a while when they surfaced near the North Pole.  They had a chance to get out of the sub and walk around, but almost as soon as they got out, here some polar bears.  They all had to hustle back into the sub.  My brother said they were bummed they couldn’t stay out longer, but they were pretty excited to see wild polar bears.

  6. Might be merely a rumor, but I heard that Leticia Martinez has come on board as Bill Ritter’s campaign manager. Do not know if it’s as part of the Kenney team, or as a replacement. Has anyone here heard anything about this?

  7. We’re coming up on the end of the year so it’s anything that needs to be bought – buy it now before we have to figure the yearly profit for taxes. On the 31st we’ll call on every credit card to get the outstanding balance and pay it off that day.

    And my CEO and CFO are busy bitching about how we could be hiring more people if we could just roll the money over to the next year. I swear, Doug Bruce would get a friendly hearing here right now.

    Come January 5 or so they’ll all come back to their senses…

  8. from the Boulder Daily Camera

    Pepsi will not advertise its drinks in next year’s Super Bowl, ending a 23-year run so the company can focus on a new marketing effort that will appear mostly online.

    Pepsi beverages have been advertised in the Super Bowl since 1987. Frito-Lay, a unit of parent company PepsiCo Inc., will still advertise.

    The company, which is based in Purchase, N.Y., wouldn’t say how much it spent last year on Super Bowl ads, but it was one of the biggest advertisers, buying several minutes of commercial time.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

56 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols