“The only shame is to have none.”
–Blaise Pascal
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: ParkHill
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Colorado Republicans Eat Their Own. Again.
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Republicans Eat Their Own. Again.
BY: unnamed
IN: Colorado Republicans Eat Their Own. Again.
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: For 15,000 Local Medicaid Patients, The Big Bad Future Is Now
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
My wife is vegan. I am an omnivore. We both found this hilarious.
Next election is the time to get rid of all the Washington politicians including Udall. He needs a real job.
http://www.recalludall.org
Your website reads like a right-wing screed and as such most will ignore it. But you raise a legit point – Udall clearly does not listen to the voters in this state as he apparently is scared to pre-announce public appearances (those code-pink people are “dangerous”).
Run with that, and other items that will appeal to the voters in the middle – and you can get some traction.
80% of independent voters have walked away from support of Democrats in congressional generic ballots.
The Pelosi-Reid agenda has failed.
a poll showing that 80% of Rs and R leaning Indies don’t approve of Obama? Because that would be mainly people who never approved of him in the first place, wouldn’t it? He has lost ground among indies but is not down to 20% approval among indies in general as your post suggests. I’m sure that wasn’t mentioned in whatever talking points sheet you looked at this morning.
Is saying that 80% of indie support is not with the Dems for congressional seats. Go see rasmussen.com. Also, POTUS polling continues to crater.
but POTUS gets him some polling lift (5pts) after tonight’s speech.
it almost feels like you’ve found someone to take you seriously!
It’s like finding your soul mate, except it’s still just a little mouth you drew on your right hand.
You must be joking. Go to RealcLearPolitics, hardly a lefty site, sometime and see how completely out of wack with other opinion polls they always are. Rasmussen’s record is good only on election polls, not opinion polls:
http://www.realclearpolitics.c…
you didn’t go through all this work without realizing that you can’t recall a Senator and that Senator Udall’s seat won’t be up for election until 2014.
There is value in stability and institutional memory, as we have found out with term limits.
Actually, I think they are, and have been, a good thing.
And I’m pretty sure the only ones at the federal level is POTUS/VPOTUS
Now I don’t.
We have lost a LOT of institutional memory in the CO legislature, and now we see the “musical seats” of reps and Senators looking for their next job instead of just staying where they are and,hopefully, getting better at it.
from Jennifer Brown over at the Post
What’s the start of that sentence?
Nice credibility, Libertad.
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_1…
http://reason.com/blog/2009/10…
You know your losing it when Rolling Stone comes out and culls your community organizing ass with an editorial titled Doubting Obama.
The President has lost all credability with America’s opinion leaders. Just ask the opinion leader in your housing block, at your worship center, at your work.
Over promising, under delivering, more taxes, deeper debt, more war. No wonder his poll numbers are in the toilet.
Or do you just assume and have a pre-done list of random follow up?
Why did you link an article that you didn’t quote? Wouldn’t it be more appropriate to link the graph source, instead of just leaving the general site at the bottom?
Never mind, you won’t read this anyway. In the unlikely event you do here’s a better graph.
Going to task the American Taxpayers 3-5 years in advance of any measurable uplift for 20 million uninsured citizens will be real tough when the polls are signaling that your doing the wrong thing. Its a recession, your cost shifting and new tax strategy doesn’t hold up.
There is no political capital to push this foul proposal across the line. Obama is – 10pts strongly App/Disapprove. Congress has 80% of indie Taxpayers/Voters NOT supporting the majority party Dems.
The majority party doesn’t have the political will to do the right thing, which is accept the GOP proposals offered in the House.
They are seen as power drunk reckless abusers a mortgage system (US Treasury) commiting to debt they can’t pay for an overpriced undervalued product (Obamacare) that will breakdown within the first 100 days.
Now the Rolling Stone comes out with a damning editorial blasting POTUS. Face it you’re dead in the water.
I’m facing I’m dead in the water. Which makes sense, I fear water so it probably goes without saying that I can’t swim. I’m lost on what that has to do with any president other than maybe Kennedy. Bastard let me down. 🙁
Medicare doesn’t compete with private insurance. It exists because private insurers don’t want to insure old people.
I keep forgetting
http://www.denverpost.com/opin…
You’re on a sugar-fueled web posting high, aren’t you?
Well, you’ve been punked already on all these posts:
1) Health Care Punk: WASTE IN THE U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM PEGGED AT $700 BILLION IN REPORT FROM THOMSON REUTERS
http://thomsonreuters.com/cont…
2) Follow-up Gov’t Health Care Punk: The Dept of Veterans Affairs, a gen-u-ine Socialist Health care system, holds down costs better than any punblic or private provider:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88x…
3) Poll Punk (from a real Polling institute):
Voters say 45 – 36 percent, including 40 – 37 percent among independents, that Obama is better able to handle health care than congressional Republicans. In October, it was 47 – 31 percent in the President’s favor.
Voters also say 59 – 29 percent that Republicans are not making a good faith effort to work with Obama and the Democrats on health care.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x129…
4) and finally, from Rupert’s own rag, the WSJ:
Government efforts to funnel hundreds of billions of dollars into the U.S. economy appear to be helping the U.S. climb out of the worst recession in decades.
http://online.wsj.com/article/…
‘tad, give it up. Asshats who write blogs versus facts from respected institutions, you lose.
Now go back and fish out the toy from the box of cereal….
http://online.wsj.com/article/…
And again, you’ve been punked, BY ME, that this bad graphics with cheap typefaces came from a fucking BLOG.
Remember? http://www.coloradopols.com/sh…
A non-name shrieking wing-nut blog that has this headline this morning:
“Black Muslim Group Celebrates “Brother & Martyr” Maurice Clemmons”
BTW, if 4 counterpoints with linked info is a Drive-By, then you can call me a Gangsta!
.
Read the whole story: bloomberg.com
That should be the name of a reality show, that’s how bizarre I’m finding the idea of a bunch of bank execs walking around with pistols in their suits.
Brooks Brothers style.
all ex Clinton and ex wall streeters
His whole team must be armed!
What is the “user image” upload in the profile section for? I’ve tried to upload images a few times. But nothing. What happens to the url and pic?
Johnson is the owner of famous right-wing blog Little Green Footballs. He has been feuding with other right-wing bloggers since last year, at first over European fascism (which many anti-Muslim bloggers support) and more recently over a whole bunch of things. Here he lays it all out. Expect responses like, “Who’s ever heard of Little Green Footballs?” along with “Johnson was always a left-winger” and “We have always been at war with Eurasia.”
http://littlegreenfootballs.co…
LGF was always as much libertarian as conservative but they did seem to have a strong contingent of nuts, as does almost every other political blog of any leaning. So it’s surprising to see him list out the whole loony bin of stupidity on the right.
Very very commendable.
The recount of the Aurora election is complete.
I lost by 851 votes out of 63,788.
A third of Douglas Co. (isn’t that May’s district?) ain’t bad. Go Pam!
I’m sorry. You did one hell of a good job running.
It sucks to lose by a few hundred votes.
between this year’s result, and your past attempt(s)?
2007
AT-LARGE Total
Bennett 11,777
Frazier 14,645
Pierce 14,116
Senn 5,495
Wilkiins 9,718
Total 55,751
2009
Council Member At-Large (two positions)
Candidate Adams Arapahoe Douglas Total %
——————————————————————————–
Pamela Bennett 893 9941 5 10839 17 %
Barbara Cleland 567 11177 0 11744 18 %
Bob FitzGerald 911 13765 2 14678 23 %
Bob LeGare 580 11105 3 11688 18 %
Alfonso NuГ±ez 607 8136 2 8745 14 %
Bob Roth 437 5654 3 6094 10 %
total 63788
The difference in turnout is from the Repubs getting their voters to turn in ballots and the Dems not. The RNC wanted to take Aurora and they did. Next year will be the same thing. If the Dems and Obama people do not vote this state will return to those glory days of yesteryear.
It looks like you lost by about half as many votes this year as you did in 2007. That’s an improvement you can build on, and your name recognition goes up the more you try. Keep at it, and maybe in 2011 you’ll get close enough to shave off those extra few hundred votes.
I know we’re not getting what we want out of our new invincible Democratic majority, but folks who voted Democrat in ’08 need to buck up to the fact that Rome wasn’t built in a day.
Republicans come out to vote almost every year; even in ’08, they came out – though not quite as strong. They built their majority through persistence, and they’ve managed over the years to push their cause very far down the field. (Don’t believe me? Look at the Federal court system…)
Republicans now want purity, and they’re losing their majority for it. Democrats have not been a “purity” party, but they want instant satisfaction – and they’re not going to get it.
If you want results, you have to vote for the best viable option in each and every election. When your viable option wins, take the next target. Repeat until you get where you want to go.
Fail to follow through, and the pendulum swings back away from you.