U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 17, 2009 04:49 AM UTC

The Really Big Event of 2010...

  •  
  • by: JO

(Other than the Winter Olympics, of course. – promoted by Colorado Pols)

…is not the election. It’s the census.

Let us admit at the start that the census is a political event above all. It places enormous importance on the outcome of elections for the state house and senate.

I gather that Colorado isn’t expected to gain or lose any seats in Congress, but the census is an opportunity to redraw districts. To that end, I recommend this article: http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~…

The essence is that many districts are drawn to incorporate continguous areas, which are packed with Democrats, whereas larger areas tend to be more Republican. Although the analysis is of Florida, it describes CO to a tee: CDs 1, 2, and 7 are not only safe Democratic districts, but by a wide margin. CD4, to take one example, could be redrawn to include parts of CDs 1, 2, and 7 without endangering that majority.

Of course, for the more radically inclined, there is the concept of multi-member districts: combining 1, 2, 7, 4 and possibly 6: one district, five representatives. I haven’t done the math, but I suspect that such a district could well elect five Democrats safely, instead of 3 safely and 1 up for grabs. Similarly, shouldn’t parts of 5 and 6 be jammed together to create a 95% Republican district?

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

50 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!