CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 29, 2009 07:11 PM UTC
5 Comments
Colorado mining companies like Newmont don’t have lots of operations in CO, but they are doing well.
Still, most of the current mining in state is coal, and that is way down. Part of the issue is, again, the glutted NatGas supply, and more power plants moving toward that fuel…
from Newmont and others is reflecting their corporate financial success?
The aberrational economic situation has certainly given a huge focus on gold – isn’t it above $1,000 an ounce? But we should not generalize to all mining. Minerals are commodities and the miners respond to international commodity prices. Sometimes that is profitable, and sometimes it is not. Colorado mining, as with other states and countries, has not been immune to the volatility and we have seen some Colorado mining operations scaled back.
It is also true that mining is sensitive to the costs imposed through regulation and adjusts accordingly. That is not to say that mining laws and regulations should not be modernized – just that we ought to make sre that we understand and embrace the ripple effects.
Severance tax revenues have plummeted, and that is causing problems for the Water Conservation Board and its programs. Most of the severance tax revenue comes from oil and gas, and we know that both have scaled back because of the global economy. Even Wyoming is seeing signficant drops in its severance tax revenues.
There are lots of reasons to question Lambert’s command of economics and public finance, and we should all have a considerable amount of amusement listening to his comments.
Can anyone point to a concrete example of a mining project failing to go forward because of the added cost of regulations?
My guess is that the cost of environmental compliance is very small compared to the cost of production (drilling/mining, refining/milling, transportation), and is trivial compared to the volatility of commodities pricing.
Furthermore, I’d guess that if such a case exists, then the operation was pretty marginal to start with, even without any compliance costs.