President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 10, 2018 11:10 AM UTC

Yes Virginia, Cancer-Causing Chemicals Cause Cancer

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Fracking near a high school in Greeley, Colorado.

As the Greeley Tribune’s Tommy Wood reports, something you really shouldn’t have to guess about has been shown once again to be correct in a new study conducted by the School of Public Health at the University of Colorado–all those hydrocarbon compounds being spewed into the air around oil and gas drilling sites that we have known for decades can cause cancer, surprise! They really do cause cancer:

The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission mandates new oil and gas wells be set back least 500 feet from a residence and 1,000 feet from high-occupancy buildings like schools and hospitals. But the study found that people who live 500 feet from an oil and gas site have a lifetime cancer risk eight times higher than the acceptable limit set by the Environmental Protection Agency. The study also found that risks of respiratory, neurological, hematological and developmental health issues are greater in people who live near oil and gas sites…

The study focused the emission of non-methane hydrocarbons, a group of compounds that includes harmful pollutants such as benzene, from oil and gas sites along the Colorado Front Range. Benzene has been proven to cause multiple forms of leukemia, cardiovascular disease and bone marrow disease. The study found average benzene concentrations were 41 times higher within 500 feet of a well than they were a mile away. Furthermore, according to the study, benzene concentrations are twice as high at night, when more people are likely to be home, because the emitted pollutants don’t disperse as quickly in the colder night air.

The study also corroborated existing data from Colorado that showed children living near oil and gas development have higher risks of childhood cancers and congenital heart defects, as well as data from studies in Pennsylvania and Texas that found a connection between proximity to oil and gas development and miscarried pregnancies, low birth weight, premature birth, asthma, fatigue and migraines.

What this study tells us is that, although there are most likely some circumstances in which oil and gas drilling close to homes and schools do not result in hazardous situations, it certainly is possible for harmful exposure to dangerous chemicals at a distance of 500 feet from a drilling site. There’s no guesswork about the toxicity of benzene, which has been known for decades to be carcinogenic as well as a source of numerous more immediate health effects due to exposure.

Despite this, mouthpieces for the oil and gas industry are tripping over themselves to smear this report’s author:

Lisa McKenzie, whose thoroughly debunked work is routinely cited by anti-fossil fuel activists, has published yet another study attempting to link health issues to oil and gas development in Colorado. And even though the study’s press release states plainly that “[t]he study acknowledged substantial uncertainties and the need for more research” — effectively invalidating its topline conclusion that, “Those living near oil and gas facilities may be at higher risk of disease” — this study is sure to catch like wildfire in ban fracking activists’ circles and add more misleading talking points to their collection.

If you take a step back from the reflexive vitriol unleashed on anyone who questions the safety of oil and gas drilling in this state, it’s a very simple and quantifiable point that benzene and other hydrocarbon emissions from oil and gas drilling sites are harmful to public health. Defenders of the industry assert that a setback of 500 feet is far enough away to disperse emissions to a safe level. Here we have evidence that no, 500 feet may not be enough distance to reduce the health risk to an acceptable level. And we’re not talking about a comparatively remote “health risk” like climate change, a favorite distraction of the industry to misdirect the debate–we’re talking about cancer.

We know which side the energy industry would have us err on. After all, they think their right to pull oil and gas out of the ground is just as important as the right of the people living on the surface to not get cancer.

Are you, average Colorado voter, comfortable taking this risk? With your own family’s health?

With that, we’ll return you to the oil and gas industry’s reflexive vitriol.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Yes Virginia, Cancer-Causing Chemicals Cause Cancer

  1. Ask the husband of the late Chris Mobaldi what he thinks about it. Steve and Chris wound up living across the road from a well site.

    Her doctor thinks it killed her.

    So do I.

    1. Like you would believe it anyway. 

      Watch the Emmy winning documentary, "Split Estate". Everything in it is true. I was there.

      You know it is practically impossible to blame a death like hers on a specific chemical. That is a bullshit "you can't catch me" dodge used by industry since the days of alchemy. 

      The late Dr.Theo Colborn, award winning bio-chemist , author, and one of the founders of The Endocrine Disruption Exchange identified hundreds of toxic chemicals used in the production of petroleum and gas. Any one of many or the accumulation of them all may have been responsible.

      Just watch the fucking movie…or shut up. If you disagree with Chris' physician after you watch what happened to her, you have that right. But please spare me the stupid evasive maneuvers, ok? I have a grudging respect for you CHB. I would like to keep it.

      BTW….the Emmy award received by this film was for the quality and thoroughness of its reasearch…so don't even bother going there.

      1. Duke: what the doctor thinks or doesn't think really doesn't matter. It's what gets put on the death certificate. And I will watch "Split Estate" later this month, when I get a bit of time. And I may or may not "shut up." I don't take orders very well, from liberals or Trump turds.

        Oh, how do you know what I might, or might not, believe?

        Regards.

        1. What you may or may not believe can be, in large measure, predicted by your previous posts.

          You do not get to be the one who decides " what matters."

           

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

258 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!