U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(R) H. Scheppelman

(D) Alex Kelloff

70%

30%

10%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Shannon Bird

45%↓

30%

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 27, 2009 01:33 AM UTC

A Turn For The Creepy In Longmont?

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’ve been following the increasingly acrimonious “nonpartisan” local elections playing out in many cities around Colorado, and as we think we’ve made clear it’s getting pretty nasty in some locales. Like in the city of Longmont, where heavy spending and big-league dirty politics by curiously mainline GOP interests, on behalf of specific candidates, has reached remarkable levels. We talked about about what seems to be a concerted move at the local level to build out a bench of the next generation of Republican state (and higher) level candidates, which would help explain the outsize resources being brought into these small-time elections.

And a little creepy “anonymous” stuff on the side, too:

Relax, it didn’t contain the dreaded ‘white powder,’ but in the last few days several Longmont residents involved in local politics (not the GOP-bankrolled kind, mind you) have reported getting these odd hand-addressed envelopes stuffed with negative campaign material. There’s no return address, but the people who got it think it was sent this way to let them know that somebody, if you will, has theirs.

Seriously, is it really necessary to get all Fatal Attraction about a suburban municipal election? Get a grip, folks, and if we see any pet rabbits getting boiled we’re calling a foul.

Comments

2 thoughts on “A Turn For The Creepy In Longmont?

  1. .

    can you spell out what you think is wrong a little bit more ?

    I hoped I could wait and figure it out from comments, but nobody else seems to get it, either.

    .

    1. Campaign material is distributed in the form of mailings, or fliers, or some other medium easily identifiable as political paraphernalia. They also have “paid for by _____” and it’s all on the level.

      This appears to have some ulterior motive, especially since it’s filled with negative campaign attacks. Given the nature of what’s been happening in the Longmont municipal elections, this seems to be a continuation, as well as an escalation, of the less-than-clean politics that we’ve seen.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

165 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols