U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Michael Bennet
(D) Phil Weiser
60%↑
50%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) David Seligman
50%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%↓
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
40%
40%
30%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Milat Kiros
90%
10%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(R) H. Scheppelman
(D) Alex Kelloff
70%
30%
10%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Trisha Calvarese
(D) Eileen Laubacher
90%
20%
20%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
70%
30%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Shannon Bird
45%↓
30%↓
30%
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
September 29, 2009 09:00 PM UTC
41 Comments
Loading ...
before I know if Penry can keep up in the fund-raising department. If he can be even close to McInnis, he wins, if not then it’ll be more interesting.
Doesn’t matter. Josh Penry will not win the nomination, Scott McInnis will lose it (in every sense of the word).
Even if McInnis raies 4 times as much $$$ as Penry, he’s bound to erupt (a la Caplis and Silverman Show) a few more times between now and August ’10. One of those eruptions will end his candidacy. It will be a “Macaca Moment” for him.
If it weren’t for McInnis’ temperment, he would probably end up being the nominee.
P.S. As a Dem, I would like to see Scooter keep the cork in place until after the primary, and then see him come unglued in the general election campaign. But we probably won’t be that lucky.
that McInnis has a temper. He always has, and people in the 3rd CD didn’t give a damn.
Actually, Scooter’s temper isn’t near as much fun as Ben Campbell’s was–now there was an eruption.
McInnis will be fine, provided he can outraise Penry by a large margin. Penry is going way to fast for a lot of Republicans, but he’d be the best candidate (from a Dem perspective) against Ritter.
Campbell’s temper. So many memories. Thanks, gertie.
P.S., Roy Romer could go ballistic as well as any of them. But Ben erupted more frequently.
Had George Allen said “macaca” at a campaign rally in 2000, he would have still gotten re-elected because no one would have had digital camcorders and YouTube.
McInnis can’t get away with it anymore.
That’s part of what I mean by McInnis has no idea how to campaign today. You do something stupid and it remains as part of the story for the rest of the campaign.
and because of it, Colorado got stuck with Dick Wadhams.
Go with me on this one. We have two young, smart, dedicated public servants (Penry and Romanoff) going up against well-heeled insiders who think the nomination is owed to them. McInnis will probably outraise Penry 2 or 3 to one…but I think Penry and Romanoff are both betting on building a critical mass of activist support — and making their respective campaigns about substantive issues. Corner McInnis and ask him what the practical effect of Ritter’s union executive order was and he’ll most likely have a melt down or make some shit up about Fort Carson. Similarly, ask Bennet what needs to happen with the Colorado River Compact long term and he’ll probably bore you to sleep with a speech about motions to invoke cloture on a bankruptcy bill.
Further, Romanoff and Penry know what they believe and they are are idea guys. Contrast that with the insider candidates (McInnis and Bennet) who have no message and are campaigning on the “it’s my turn” argument. McInnis performance at this weekend’s straw poll proves my point.
Another practical question worth considering is which of the two insider candidates (McInnis or Bennet) will Anschutz spend the most money on? He likes ’em both, but can he play both sides?
is one way to describe a guy who has never held down a job outside of politics.
Advising the faltering campaign of Bernie Buescher is probably “private sector” experience to some.
Further, working to find uranium deposits throughout the west so you can flip them to an international company for exploitation is probably “private sector” experience as well:
http://www.gjsentinel.com/feat…
Glass house, my friend. Glass house.
1. Mining
2. Nuclear Energy
3. Start ups
4. Private sector employment
5. People leaving the private sector to become in politics
6. Blogs
7. Free Speech
8. People who disagree with you
I am not sure what you are trying to say about Ralphie, but I do believe it is uncalled for.
Anyone in category (8) TCG finds unacceptable.
I fully support 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and I tolerate 8. What I DO NOT support is hypocrisy. Not saying I’ve never been guilty of it, but you all are quick to jump on me when it happens…so I don’t hesitate go do the same for others. We all keep each other honest, right?
Ralphie made the point that Penry could be described as a “dedicated public servant” if you define it by those who have been on the public dole their entire adult lives.
Which Penry has been.
Accusing Ralphie of same is flat wrong.
So how do you explain Penry’s love for the dole?
his love for “the dole” comes from Dole’s service to our country and his vast record of accomplishment in the US Senate.
Still wet-behind-the-ears Penry and Bob Dole.
You’re not as cute as you think, TaxCheat.
You still aren’t answering the observations about Penry’s job history: college quarterback (state funded), aide to McInnis (federal paycheck) and state legislator (state paycheck.) All with health benefits, we might add.
I’ve never been anti-mining. I have never professed to be anti-mining. I have worked since I was 13. I was an ice rink guard for my hometown recreation department for a few years, but all my other work has been for private corporations.
I did not advise any campaigns at all in 2008. I had a real job. You must have me confused with someone else.
…at Ted Kennedy now, are you?
This seals the deal for Andrew Romanoff!
Penry/Romanoff 2016!
Penry considered to be the outsider? You have got to be joking?!?
Given a choice between Penry and McInnis, why on earth would people worry about Ritter being re-elected? I’m sorry, but from what I know of both candidates they are both Saturday Night Live skits waiting to happen.
The Democrats can only hope Penry gets the nomination . . .
…Penry seems disciplined while the “other” guy seems like a walking SNL skit:
If this election was in 2000, McInnis would have this won in a walk. But it’s 2010 and Penry will win by a decent (large if McInnis blows up) margin with McInnis and crew thinking they have it until the votes are counted.
I talked regularly to a number of people on Joan’s team throughout the election. I don’t think they ever understood that there are all these new avenues of communication out there and how they all interact with each other.
When there is a fundamental change in a system, old-school goes from being a strong advantage to being a major hindrance.
except that it wasn’t just that Polis had a slightly better understanding of the Web (you’re really missing how well Fitz-Gerald’s team got up to speed on that). Dumping $6 million into television advertising, buying endorsements from nonprofits and fielding an army of paid volunteers had a little bit to do with Polis’ narrow margin of victory, too. Penry and Polis are both young and they have similar hairlines, but only one of them has the ability to self-finance like that.
Clearly Penry grasps the web and new communication mediums and I suspect Romanoff will demonstrate his proficiency soon enough. I believe that understanding (of campaigning in 2010 vs. 2000) will propel each of them to victory in their respective primaries. Romanoff and Penry are not Matt Miles type candidates. They’re serious, they’re smart and they each have a following.
I saw JFG’s team ignoring the web throughout. Prior to endorsing Jared I occasionally suggested they try something. After I endorsed Jared I just watched in amazement.
Case in point – Jared had his ads everywhere on the Daily Camera website – JFG & WS didn’t have anything. And those ads were dirt cheap.
Jared’s money helped too but JFG had over a million which is more than enough to run a competitive campaign in CD-2. And she had active union & Emily’s List support which provides a strong advantage.
I think we’ll have to wait and see how each uses the web. If there is a big difference in how effectively each uses it, that will make a big difference in the vote.
…”these new avenues of communication” had much to do with it. $7 million dollars of self-funding? Yeah, probably.
I got a glossy direct mail piece from Polis about every other day running up to the primary. It was constant.
but I think there is a lot more to it than just old v. new technologies/tactics.
I think Penry will ride the tea bag wave, but question whether that will get him into the Gov’s chair.
Here is a freshly posted Letter online at gjsentinel.com to get a flavor of what the ‘base’ (i.e. primary voters) think-
Give me a break.
Ross is a right-wing fruitcake.
http://rossputin.com/blog/inde…
It would be as hard to call him representative of the rank and file as it would be to call me the same thing.
Gotta do better, Twitty, unless you are TRYING to prove that Penry is the darling of the lunatic fringe.
You think the rabid fringe has anything but contempt for McInnis?
That was sort of my point, although it might have been too subtle.
Penry is the choice of fruitcakes like Kaminski. It remains to be seen whether he can appeal to Real People.
i.e. I think Penry is the pick of the ‘lunatic fringe’ which I think is becoming indiscernible from the GOP primary voter, and thus not sure how well he will do in the general, although it should get him the nomination.
which with their shrinking of the R Party to being controlled by self-interest extremists, have proven they are not, McInnis would be their nominee. But as control of the R Party apparatus has been usurped by extremists with only self in mind, I’m inclined to believe that Penry will be the nominee. And as uberCon Penry is even further to the right of Beauprez and Schaffer, with the difference being that those two have actually accomplished something in their lives, Penry will stick out like a sore thumb, showing all of Colorado what is wrong with the R party nowadays. A questionable moderate like McInnis would have a far greater chance of drawing unaffiliateds, moderates and disaffected D’s than would an extremist uberCon like Penry. If you believe Colorado is in an economic quandary now, just imagine what it would be like with a do-nothing out-of-state controlled puppet like Penry.
“Is anyone else here tired of the flimflam, mealy-mouthed Republican?” –Josh Penry
Despite all kinds of missteps the Democrats in both Virginia are within the margin of error for the Governor’s races to be decided in November. In 1993 both states elected Republican governors and presaged the huge Democratic losses in 1994. A win in either state would be great news for the President and the DNC.
REMOVE MY NAME from you Jeffco Line, I am NOT running for Jefferson County Commissioner. I have a child to raise without a father and you people have added stress to my life with putting this LIE in print.
I have a wonderful job as a Teacher’s Aide in Jefferson County schools and you may have put my job in jeopardy with this lie.
Repeat, I am NOT running for any office.
My husband Dave Auburn was a good and faithful servant to the people of Jefferson County. Dave was the Best Corporate Manager this county ever could have and the people of Jefferson County chose not to re-elect him. Jefferson County’s loss and my and our son’s gain.
I demand a public apology from the person who printed this lie and an immediate retraction of my name from the Jeffcopols.com site as a commissioner candidate.
Oh, I don’t know, e-mailing them? Posting the comment here is about as likely to be read as screaming it outside the Taj Mahal over there in JeffCO.