President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 26, 2009 03:17 AM UTC

Washington Post's "The Fix" puts Markey on endangered list

  • 20 Comments
  • by: BobMoore

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post, whose “The Fix” blog is popular reading for political junkies, ranks Betsy Markey’s House seat at No. 9 on his list of seats most likely to change party hands in 2010.

Colorado’s 4th Congressional District wasn’t on Cillizza’s radar in July, when he last rated House races across the country, but it is now. I think Cillizza is a good barometer of how Colorado’s 4th Congressional District race is viewed inside the Beltway. Here’s how Cillizza summed up the race in his “Friday House Line” blog:

“Rep. Betsy Markey’s (D) victory was a culmination of years of dissatisfaction directed at former Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R) from voters in the district. Musgrave was far more conservative than her constituents in this eastern Colorado seat, and did little to combat the image that she cared little about constituent services and everything about her national profile (such as it was). Republicans are very excited about the candidacy of state Rep. Cory Gardner and Markey must show she can win a race without Musgrave as her opponent. The seat is narrowly divided along partisan lines with Obama losing it narrowly (49 percent) last November.”

In his final assessment of the 2008 campaign in late October, Cillizza had Colorado’s 4th as the ninth-most likely to change party control, saying, “Markey is likely to end Musgrave’s congressional career in four days time.”

Cillizza is the first of the Washington pundits who analyze House races to say Markey’s seat is in jeopardy, but he probably won’t be the last. As of now, the Cook Political Report, CQPolitics and the Rothenberg Political Report give Markey the edge in the 2010 race. However, at this point in the 2008 campaign those analysts gave the edge to Musgrave, only to later say the race was tilting toward Markey.

Obviously, Cillizza’s assessment is quite a bit different than The Big Line on Colorado Pols. For what it’s worth, I think The Fix is more on the mark than The Big Line in handicapping CO4. I think Gardner-Markey is an extremely tight matchup right now, and will continue to be into next fall. (This is assuming Gardner gets the GOP nomination, which is what the national party clearly thinks will happen.)

For the links on all this, see my Coloradoan blog: http://bit.ly/10Rq5n

Comments

20 thoughts on “Washington Post’s “The Fix” puts Markey on endangered list

    1. Historically conservative but perhaps changing in some areas.  Markey will have the advantage of incumbency – Gardner will appeal to the sizable conservative bloc, plus may not come across as nutty as others in his party.

      As I said, no charge for the above – and it’s worth every penny.

    2. It’s more the partisan split of the district, though the GOP is high on Gardner as they try to push through fresh faces. Of course, he’s never been tested in a tight campaign, so that’s an unknown. It’s not an accident that this was a Republican district for 36 years. Though the demographics have changed, the GOP still has the strong registration edge. The unaffiliateds ultimately will determine this race. Markey won them easily in 2008, as did Udall over Schaffer in the Senate race, though less so. If the Democrats are weakened nationally in 2010, it will play out in CO4.

          1. As a partisan filibusterer, especially when his whole legislative agenda has nothing to do with what’s good for his constituents, but boils down to “what third-reading amendments can I introduce?”

            1. I’m not saying I like the guy.  I’m just saying when you meet him in person he comes across well — that’s important.

              i know his record — I know he’s crazy far right.  I also know people up in that area really like him.

  1. races I’ll be working on.  I can’t claim to know Ms. Markey well, and Mr. Gardner not at all, but I think Ms. Markey is doing a good job and cares about her constituents–something that has not always been the case.

  2. At least I hope so. She has a lot going for her and to beat an incumbent like Musgrave shows which direction the country is heading.  I think Democrats have more to worry about with other Democrats.  

    Has anyone read the latest assessment about the economy and capitalism? According to

    Marc Faber we’re in for some bad times and in my opinion we probably deserve it for the way we’ve allowed greed and profits to control our politicians and country.

    In this month’s issue of The Gloom, Boom & Doom Report, Marc Faber issued one of the gloomiest, most depressing takes on the financial crisis and its impact. Faber said that the future, “will be a total disaster, with a collapse of our capitalistic system as we know it today, wars, massive government debt defaults and the impoverishment of large segments of Western society.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

    1. With her co sponsorship of the union boss special

      card check, forced arbitration and outsized administrative fining

      she should be collecting millions in forced dues from union bosses as payback.

      And don’t forget that pledging of Dave Owens great-great grandchildren’s earnings for the upgrades to Murtha Int’l, ACORN, NEA outreach, etc…

      1. But you have to remember that McCain carried the district narrowly against Obama, in the face of the biggest Democratic surge in decades. So 4th district unaffiliated voters who hold the balance of power will back those they see as moderates, such as McCain and Markey. What that means is that you’re going to see both sides in 2010 trying to paint the other guy as extreme.

  3. You’d think Betsy Markey could pull 2% more. I’m not saying it’s going to be a blowout for Markey, but she’s done everything she needs to do to get re-elected IMO.

    She’s been more open to her constituents than any of the rest of the Colorado delegation. Whether people agree with her on every issue is irrelevant. CD-4 voters care about their representatives actually listening to them.

    I agree with Bob that this will be a tight race, but if Betsy wins, she could turn into quite a major plyer in Colorado politics. Much the same way Hank Brown used CD-4 as a stepping off point to the Senate, it’s possible Markey could end up there in 2016 if Bennet or Romanoff can’t seal the deal in 2010.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

39 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!