(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
40%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
55%↓
45%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
According to a study from Kantar Media/CMAG, media spending in 2010 on both Senate and House races is up exponentially from 2008.
Between Sept. 1 and Oct. 7, nearly $115 million has been spent on U.S. Senate races, compared to $62 million in 2008. The jump isn’t quite as big for House races, though it is still significantly more, from $51 million in 2008 to $84 million in 2010.
So what has made the bulk of the difference in spending in these last two years? It appears the prevalence of Republican interests groups has a lot to do with it. The top six interest groups that have spent the most money in 2010 are all aligned with Republicans.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments