U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Michael Bennet
50%
50%
50%
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 06, 2009 10:31 PM UTC
12 Comments
Unbeknownst to us, apparently you can buy a “subscription” to Colorado Pols for your Amazon Kindle:
For once you posted something good.
…here’s hoping Michael Steele, Rush and that annoying skinny blond chick breed into your family.
One of the downsides to not actually being funded by rich people.
If only you could get part of that $0.99/month/subscription you could afford the lawyer to make sure you get part of that $0.99/month/subscription!
Did you notice that a Maine site is ranked (at all) higher? Yeah, so I wouldn’t worry much. 🙂
…. and some good old promotion by Pols
Before they can sell subscriptions, someone would actually have to buy a Kindle… 🙂
Now that Colorado Pols is available this has persuaded me. I’m going to buy a Kindle!! OK, maybe not.
The claims of any copyright holder (broadcast TV stations are among the worst offenders) who foist access to 100% of the content of a work upon the public without charge, and then seek to demand money for using that material has always been a bit dodgy, although the letter of the law permits copyright holders to do just that.
But, it certainly looks like a pretty clear copyright violation by Amazon to me. While momentary downloading of a non-subscription web page for contemporaneous viewing while connected to the Internet is clearly fair use, this Kindle application goes far beyond that and is intentionally using the distinction between normal fair use of a non-subscription webpage on the Internet and what their product does to sell the machines.
In contrast, a feature of the new Kindle which is far less suspect — it has an electronic voice read text from electronic books aloud, and which is already widely available with fuller feature computers, has spawned a copyright suit from book publishers, who claim that Amazon is selling an audiobook while paying a royalty only for an eBook.
its for the cause bro!
to put the Denver Post out of business…
With all due respect…can’t we start a union – PWP…..people who post.