U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 20, 2009 05:32 PM UTC

Dobson Takes Sudden Interest In Fiscal Responsibility

  • 0 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family is taking its inevitable opposition to Senate Bill 88 to Colorado radio this week. SB-88, which would provide health benefits to the same-sex partners of state employees, is being hit with much less sensationalist spin than recent Focus state legislative efforts–compare this new, relatively dry ad (click below) to last year’s hysterical fearmongering over SB08-200, the dreaded “bathroom bill.”

http://coloradopols.com/wp-content/uploads/old_images…

(.MP3, 30 seconds)

We’re not going to get into the specific numbers cited by Focus in this ad, except to say that fiscal impact estimates for legislation are prepared by nonpartisan state employees–and kill by realistic estimates far more bills than they “lowball.” Even most Republicans will agree with this statement, having been on the long and short end of these estimates themselves.

But as for Focus on the Family, you have to ask yourself: are these the people who should be lecturing you about smart fiscal choices? After all, the Colorado Independent reported last week how Focus spent an unprecedented amount of money helping pass California’s gay marriage ban–at the same time as they were laying off 20 percent of their employees.

Now at least in theory, Focus has a lot of functions besides political advocacy–the organization has long prided itself in it direct charity work, mental health and relationship counseling, and other services provided to the Christian community. These are the sorts of services, with much more arguable value, that are getting cut so they can focus on what seems to matter most right now–wedge-issue political grandstands. Adaptive, too: the bill in question has nothing to do with marriage whatsoever, you say? No problem, we’re fiscal hawks now!

But how many suicide hotline counselors got pink slips so they could run this ad?  

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

109 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols