In case you haven’t noticed, there’s a budget crisis in Colorado. When this happens, governments at every level are forced to look at any and all ways they can maximize revenue under the legal constraints imposed on them.
One way to do this is by identifying loopholes in existing law that allow individuals and business to skip out on taxes they would otherwise have to pay. This isn’t always a popular process, but sometimes a ‘villain’ can be found that nobody will jump up and down to defend (see title)–except for lobbyists being paid to, of course.
Yesterday, Rep. Claire Levy introduced a bill to regulate a “tax evasion scheme” called a captive real estate investment trust–essentially a shell company owned by related entities that exists to transfer profits offshore to avoid paying taxes. Rep. Levy’s bill would require that profits earned by captive REITs be taxed like any other corporate income earned in the state of Colorado.
Full release follows; the bill passed the House Finance Committee by a 10-1 vote yesterday. Says Rep. Levy, “These companies are abusing the public trust. By sending their Colorado profits overseas and back through a series of shell corporations, they avoid paying their fair share of taxes. This bill is a way to create transparency.”
BILL ADDRESSES MISUSE OF TAX CODE
Lawmakers Expose Corporate Tax Cheats and Demand Transparency(DENVER) State Representative Claire Levy (D-Boulder) today presented a bill targeting a tax evasion scheme used by Wal-Mart and other large corporations. Eleven other lawmakers joined Rep. Levy as sponsors of the legislation, which was passed out of the House Finance Committee on a bipartisan 10-1 vote.
The bill requires corporations to declare the use of suspect transactions on their corporate tax return. The targeted tax evasion scheme makes use of a financial arrangement know as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT). Normally, a REIT has 100 investors, each with a small stake in the investment company. In Wal-Mart’s case, the company transfers the ownership of their Colorado stores to a REIT which is 99% owned by Wal-Mart itself and the remaining 1% is owned by 99 Wal-Mart executives. That company then transfers the profits to an overseas company which exists simply to avoid having to report the income to the state government.
“These companies are abusing the public trust,” said Rep. Levy. “By sending their Colorado profits overseas and back through a series of shell corporations, they avoid paying their fair share of taxes. This bill is a way to create transparency. It permits the Department of Revenue to look at corporate transactions and make sure they have real economic purposes and are not intended only to avoid or reduce tax liability.”
“This bill does not create a new tax. These are taxes that are rightfully owed. The people of Colorado pay taxes; so should corporations,” said Rep. Levy. “It is time to put a stop to this sham. The underpayment, and in some cases outright avoidance, of taxes greatly stifles economic development in Colorado.”
The Wall Street Journal and others have noted that Wal-Mart pays itself rent and calls that a tax-deductible business expense, thus skirting payment of standard taxes. The Journal notes that Wal-Mart avoided paying $350 million in state taxes between 1998 and 2001.
Many other states have taken action against the company in recent years.
Rep. Levy explained that federal tax law created REITs to allow small investors to participate in real estate markets that would otherwise require very large amounts of capital. Legitimate use of REITs is not affected by this bill.
The bill implements the long-standing policy in Colorado that corporate profits earned in the state are subject to state tax, and it distinguishes between valid Real Estate Investment Trusts and Captive REITs such as Wal-Mart’s.
# # #
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Farmer Warns Trump Policies Could Have Lasting Negative Effects on Crop Growers
BY: kwtree
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JeffcoDemo
IN: Colorado Farmer Warns Trump Policies Could Have Lasting Negative Effects on Crop Growers
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Why Doesn’t Anyone Want to Host Our Nazi Keynote Speaker?
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
…can’t Ritter just cut his spending?
😉
Cut the spending on widows & orphans – for Walmart’s sake…
snark
since you’re willing to turn a blind eye to the taxes that Walmart rightfully owes, how about doing me a favor and promising that, if elected, you’ll turn a blind eye to the taxes that I owe?
After all, we can just cut spending, right?
Is outlawing tax abetments(?) for comapnies like Walmart to locate in a given city. They are going to open a store in an area no matter what but they get each city in the area to compete with offering lower taxes to be in their city. The end result is over time with everyone offering breaks to different companies, all end up worse off.
I do see offering it for companies that are considering different states like a manufacturing plant – but not for entities that will locate in Colorado and the competition is just between cities in this state.
Can cities give a tax abatements on state taxes? If not, how is your comment relevant to the discussion?
including property taxes – which is a biggie from someone like Walmart.
in the name of “economic development” as David correctly points out.
IIRC, Ali, didn’t your father’s firm receive one of these abatements from Pueblo and the State of Colorado both ?
Irony
but is this a tax increase covered by TABOR?
…because on a quick pass, it seeks to amend an existing tax code in the area of enforcement. The tax itself already exists, so it’s not adding any new ones.
Besides, with TABOR looming over every bill that comes out the Legislature, I’m sure it’s been vetted to pass it’s evil cold reach…
I think there are ways to walk around it.* The way taxes are collected is one.
Last year Weissman came up with (rather a man yelled it at him on his way home from the bar) an idea to collect some kind of tax quarterly instead of yearly, earning the state a small fortune in interest.
The leg. can absolutely change when to collect; when as in year and when as in profit (before or after expenses, investments, that kind of thing).
*In a more typical, sinister example I wouldn’t be happy (along with most people) and the legislator introducing the bill would never be re-elected.
We testified in favor of this bill yesterday. Colorado could see up to $35 Million per year from this loophole closure (North Carolina saw similar revenue when they closed their loophole, and Kentucky is seemingly owed $4 million by a single company).
OK, I”m no expert, but I think it was called a unitary tax or something. International companies having offices in CA pay some tax on the earnings of the entire company, wherever they are.
I’m not sure if this would be an offset to this loophole, but it does have its pluses.
Ironically, I lost a wonderful job due to this. They closed our CA office, being a branch of an office in Lakewood, and that a branch of the home company in South Africa.