from the Boulder Daily Camera
A smoking ban in one Colorado city led to a dramatic drop in heart attack hospitalizations within three years, a sign of just how serious a health threat secondhand smoke is, government researchers said Wednesday.
If someone wants to smoke themselves – go crazy. Ruin your health, have trouble breathing from moderate exercise, get cancer – that’s all your choice.
But killing others with you, call me a nanny state proponent but I think we should not allow people to kill those around them.
In the new study, researchers reviewed hospital admissions for heart attacks in Pueblo. Patients were classified by ZIP codes. They then looked at the same data for two nearby areas that did not have bans — the area of Pueblo County outside the city and for El Paso County.
In Pueblo, the rate of heart attacks dropped from 257 per 100,000 people before the ban to 152 per 100,000 in the three years afterward. There were no significant changes in the two other areas.
105 people are alive today who would otherwise be dead due to the actions of the Pueblo City government. Major kudos to them.
As to our state legislature, and the City Council in the rest of our cities, it’s illegal to fire a gun in the air because the bullet comes back down and can kill someone when it does. How is letting someone light up any different from that?
This is one of those places where the legislation not only costs nothing, but saves money in reduced medical costs, which are borne by all of us. Lives saved, lower costs, what’s not to like…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Republican 36
IN: Colorado’s “MAGA King” Creepily Commemorates OKC Bombing
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Colorado’s “MAGA King” Creepily Commemorates OKC Bombing
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: NPR: SecDefBro’s Days In The Job Are Numbered
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: NPR: SecDefBro’s Days In The Job Are Numbered
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Genghis
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Colorado’s “MAGA King” Creepily Commemorates OKC Bombing
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
There has never been conclusive evidence that second hand smoke causes health problems.
The study above appears pretty conclusive to me. If you understand science you know that nothing is 100%. So you do studies and none are perfect at isolating the item being studied.
But I think it is safe to say that the odds of their being causation are quite high.
.
Mr. Thi,
that conclusion is a hint that you don’t have such a firm grasp of science your own darn self.
I can explain the change without any reference to smoking or a ban on smoking.
Folks in P-town (does anybody still call it that anymore ?) are really juiced about slapping down the Springs in Federal court, salivating at the prospect of denying access to CS-owned water that was the reason the Springs built Pueblo Reservoir in the first place.
A couple of old ranchers (105 of them, by your count,) plus even more further down the Ark valley, are excited that they will still be able to use (and make money off of) Colorado Springs-owned water that flows downstream because its legal owner can’t (yet) get it.
Oops. I guess you were right after all. Pueblo City & County government has inspired those old coots to hang on just to see the a-holes to the North get their comeuppance.
Touche.
.
People who are regularly exposed to secondhand smoke (bartenders, waiters, children of smokers) develop health issues at rates very similar to those who do not encounter second-hand smoke regularly.
One study even looked at the chemical composition of second-hand smoke and found that it was actually more toxic than inhaled smoke (The smoke that comes off of the end of the cigarette is not filtered and contains higher levels of toxins).
I’ve yet to see anything. I disagree with Dave’s statement above that the study he cited is conclusive proof.
Darwin’s initial work was the best explination for the data he found. But it took another 10 – 20 years of additional study to show that evolution was a solid theory.
This is the most sophisticated study in this question to date and as such should carry the most weight.