U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

60%↑

40%↑

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 31, 2008 04:00 AM UTC

Summit Daily Endorses Romanoff

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Justin.Henceroth@gmail.com

From the Summit Daily News:

Assuming Sen. Ken Salazar gets confirmed as President-elect Barack Obama’s pick for Secretary of the Interior, Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter will get to do one of the most undemocratic things imaginable: Pick a U.S. Senator all on his own.

No, it’s not fair, but it’s the system that’s in place. And, as politicians are wont to do, Ritter will make the appointment in large part based on what the perceived chances are of the new senator getting reelected in 2010. In an ideal, completely fair world, Ritter would pick someone who would serve completely altruistically, with a stated intention of not running for re-election. But we don’t live in an ideal world; we live in a political one, so who’s the best choice?

The top names on Ritter’s list are U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter, Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, U.S. Rep. John Salazar and outgoing state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. The conservative voices on our editorial board want Ritter to pick Hickenlooper since he’d be “beaten like a baby seal” in the next election. We’re not sure if that’s true, but we also know that, as popular as Hickenlooper is in Denver, he has little experience venturing outside the metro area. As for Salazar, Democrats won’t like him leaving the CD-3 seat open for a GOP grab – and we’re not wild about anything that smacks of a dynasty.

Rep. Perlmutter has the makings of a war chest for reelection and is a Democrat who can win votes in the suburbs. But as a relative newcomer, he lacks experience on the state-wide issues. In that respect, our nod would go to Romanoff. He has the ability to rally Democrats behind him and also to show political leadership by spanning the partisan divide on issues. He would certainly have the ability to raise funds and defend the seat in 2010.

Overall, Romanoff has a much better feel for issues beyond the metro area, both in his role as Speaker and in his statewide campaign to support the SAFE amendment. Romanoff has proven to be a hard worker, a bridge builder and a decent politician in an era when that term often can be an oxymoron. He is a legislator and a coalition builder by instinct and would serve Colorado well in Washington if chosen.

It repeats a lot of the same things people on here have been saying.  But most importantly, it highlights his statewide experience as an important factor for consideration.

Comments

8 thoughts on “Summit Daily Endorses Romanoff

  1. I’ve tried to not let the fact that I know a lot more about Romanoff than the other two color my view. But I do think he clearly would be best in terms of legislating.

    And on the other big question, yes I think he will win re-election by a strong margin.

  2. thinks Perlmutter is a “relative newcomer” compared with Romanoff. Perlmutter was in the state Senate racking up leadership positions when Romanoff was still in college.

    1. at least compared to Andrew.  He did a lot of work in the state senate, but never made statewide (and outside of Metro Denver) issues a priority as Andrew has.  As for your joke about him being in college – Perlmutter was elected in 1995, and Andrew started serving as a policy advisor to Gov. Romer in 1997, pretty similar time frame.  Through his work on Ref. C and in his term as Speaker of the House, Romanoff addressed statewide concerns much more than Perlmutter ever has.  For those on the Western Slope (and the Eastern plains I would presume) Perlmutter is and would be seen as a newcomer to working with us, while Romanoff has already done so extensively.

      1. .

        because he would be the best President for the nation,

        but when it comes to a Senator, pick the one that will be best for my tribe.

        I got it.

        .  

        1. He came up through Chicago politics – that is a very rough business. And my point was not that we want someone who’s just out for us. But neither do we want someone who sees a perfect world and is headed for that regardless of what the rest of the world wants.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

102 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols