From the Summit Daily News:
Assuming Sen. Ken Salazar gets confirmed as President-elect Barack Obama’s pick for Secretary of the Interior, Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter will get to do one of the most undemocratic things imaginable: Pick a U.S. Senator all on his own.
No, it’s not fair, but it’s the system that’s in place. And, as politicians are wont to do, Ritter will make the appointment in large part based on what the perceived chances are of the new senator getting reelected in 2010. In an ideal, completely fair world, Ritter would pick someone who would serve completely altruistically, with a stated intention of not running for re-election. But we don’t live in an ideal world; we live in a political one, so who’s the best choice?
The top names on Ritter’s list are U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter, Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, U.S. Rep. John Salazar and outgoing state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. The conservative voices on our editorial board want Ritter to pick Hickenlooper since he’d be “beaten like a baby seal” in the next election. We’re not sure if that’s true, but we also know that, as popular as Hickenlooper is in Denver, he has little experience venturing outside the metro area. As for Salazar, Democrats won’t like him leaving the CD-3 seat open for a GOP grab – and we’re not wild about anything that smacks of a dynasty.
Rep. Perlmutter has the makings of a war chest for reelection and is a Democrat who can win votes in the suburbs. But as a relative newcomer, he lacks experience on the state-wide issues. In that respect, our nod would go to Romanoff. He has the ability to rally Democrats behind him and also to show political leadership by spanning the partisan divide on issues. He would certainly have the ability to raise funds and defend the seat in 2010.
Overall, Romanoff has a much better feel for issues beyond the metro area, both in his role as Speaker and in his statewide campaign to support the SAFE amendment. Romanoff has proven to be a hard worker, a bridge builder and a decent politician in an era when that term often can be an oxymoron. He is a legislator and a coalition builder by instinct and would serve Colorado well in Washington if chosen.
It repeats a lot of the same things people on here have been saying. But most importantly, it highlights his statewide experience as an important factor for consideration.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: scarter
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s A Weekend Town Hall-Palooza Featuring Absent Gabe Evans
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Uber Bullies Lawmakers To Protect Bad Drivers
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I’ve tried to not let the fact that I know a lot more about Romanoff than the other two color my view. But I do think he clearly would be best in terms of legislating.
And on the other big question, yes I think he will win re-election by a strong margin.
He’s my pick. I would be fine with Perlmutter or Hickenlooper but I really, really want Romanoff to take this seat.
thinks Perlmutter is a “relative newcomer” compared with Romanoff. Perlmutter was in the state Senate racking up leadership positions when Romanoff was still in college.
at least compared to Andrew. He did a lot of work in the state senate, but never made statewide (and outside of Metro Denver) issues a priority as Andrew has. As for your joke about him being in college – Perlmutter was elected in 1995, and Andrew started serving as a policy advisor to Gov. Romer in 1997, pretty similar time frame. Through his work on Ref. C and in his term as Speaker of the House, Romanoff addressed statewide concerns much more than Perlmutter ever has. For those on the Western Slope (and the Eastern plains I would presume) Perlmutter is and would be seen as a newcomer to working with us, while Romanoff has already done so extensively.
.
But we can’t have that because … ?
.
Please save us from those that are guided by a vision of righteousness as opposed to the grimy grubby work of effecting compromises from the various parties involved.
.
because he would be the best President for the nation,
but when it comes to a Senator, pick the one that will be best for my tribe.
I got it.
.
He came up through Chicago politics – that is a very rough business. And my point was not that we want someone who’s just out for us. But neither do we want someone who sees a perfect world and is headed for that regardless of what the rest of the world wants.