Denver Police Union Calls For Chief White’s Resignation

Defaced Denver Police memorial.

Defaced Denver Police memorial.

In a development sure to have political ramifications, 9NEWS reports on a fresh war of words between the Denver Police Protective Association and DPD chief Robert White after a vandalism incident during a large anti-police brutality protest march Saturday:

The head of Denver's police union wants Chief Robert White gone.

He says officers were told not to take immediate action when protesters defaced a memorial for fallen officers.

"We will no longer follow him as we move forward," said Nick Rogers, president of the Denver Police Protective Association. "He is not our chief."

Saturday, demonstrators aiming to protest what they perceive as police brutality threw red paint on the memorial, which sits outside of Denver Police headquarters. Rogers says DPD brass told officers not to take immediate action.

As 9NEWS reports, Denver Police under Chief White have followed a less-confrontational policy when dealing with protest marches, identifying individual lawbreakers for later arrest as opposed to charging into crowds to break up illegal activities on sight. Our understanding is that in a life-threatening situation, police would still wade into a protest to restore order, but not for (as in this case) preventing petty vandalism committed by a small number of protesters. Two suspects have already been arrested over Saturday's incident.

We get up early to beat the crowds.

“We get up early to beat the crowds.”

Such a policy becomes more important to strictly adhere to, though we'd say it always should be important, when police respond to a protest against police brutality. In addition to the nationwide headlines in recent months over the issue of police killings and beatings of unarmed citizens, DPD itself has a long and unsettling record of police brutality–and a culture of mutual silence and protection among police officers accused of misconduct that has made cracking down on the problem very difficult. Repeated, well-publicized instances of obvious misconduct by Denver police, both in the commission and concealment of violence against undeserving citizens, have severely eroded the trust of the community they serve. Accountability for Denver police accused of misconduct remains slow, uneven, and too often dependent on the media forcing the hand of officials.

Bottom line: everything we have heard about Chief White suggests that he is genuinely committed to reforming both the public image and internal culture of the DPD, and this reflects creditably on Mayor Michael Hancock for appointing him. However emotional police officers may be about this memorial to fallen officers–and we don't want to disparage that legtimate sentiment–it would absolutely have been the wrong decision to break from established policy and violently charge into this crowd over what amounts to petty vandalism.

Chief White told rank and file that he found the vandalism "abhorrent" but said "I believe the decision we made was appropriate."

Rogers says the actions send a different message.

"The message I got was you, as a police officer, are not as important as our image," Rogers says.

In early December, several Denver Police officers were injured, one critically, in an unrelated car accident that followed a large walk-out of students from East High School protesting against police brutality. The same Denver police union at that time circulated rumors that students had jeered the injured officers, which was not corroborated by any of the numerous media outlets on scene or witnesses other than Denver police. The story made for good mythmaking on FOX News, but locally, it wasn't good for the police union's credibility. In this case, calling for the chief of police to resign for following his established policy, and not giving in to emotion where it could make his job harder in the long run, makes Chief White look like a hero.

As for the Denver Police Protective Association? Maybe it's time they reflect on who they're really supposed to be protecting. Because whether they realize it or not, this is not the "image" they want.

0 Shares

9 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. davebarnesdavebarnes says:

    I support Robert White.
    A defaced memorial can be repaired. Easily.
    Not always the case with injured people.
     

  2. kwtreemamajama55 says:

    Agree, davebarnes. This was an act of political protest. White did the right thing in not escalating it.

    That said, I think the protesters picked the wrong target. Throwing paint on a fallen officer memorial is provocative and disrespectful, does not promote dialogue. And this is from someone with a history of guerilla theater and artistic protest.

  3. notaskinnycooknotaskinnycook says:

    Splashing the paint was not well-done, but since the police know who was responsible they can be made to clean up their mess as part of the community service they'll inevitably be sentenced to.                                                                     The police union people are doing themselves no favors setting themselves against the Chief, who has done much to repair the damage done by rogue cops in the last few years. This will come back to bite them in the future. Just watch.

  4. Molly Brown says:

    Keep in mind that this is the same police union that claimed–falsely, and for political purposes–that the crowd cheered when an officer was hit by a car during the East High protests. The union who cried wolf?

  5. Next up for an apparently petulant Denver police union – a repeat of NYC's slowdown of arrests and tickets? 'cause it worked so well in New York.

    Considering the last time I was at a protest the DPD sent out its finest SWAT teams in MRAPs to protect the city from our oh-so-violent selves, I have no problem throwing my support immediately to Chief White and against the tactics of the union.

    (And yes, the method of protest – defacing a police memorial – was in poor taste, and poorly considered.)

  6. OrangeFreeOrangeFree says:

    These protestors really are idiots. Setting their camp on fire and booing Hancock at a homeless vigil lost them the public's support during the camp-in, this will lose them support during their police protesting. 

    That being said…

    "We will no longer follow him as we move forward…He is not our chief."

    If that's the case, time for Mr. Rogers to be fired for insubordination, as well as anyone else who follows.

  7. IndependentProgressiveIndependentProgressive says:

    So, Nick Rogers and the critics wanted real blood instead of just red paint.

    The Chief acted as the grown-up in this situation, which makes the juvenile protestors and the juvenile critics mad.

    What else needs to be said?

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.