(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Mark Baisley
90%↑
10%
(D) Jena Griswold
(R) Michael Allen
70%
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
80%↑
20%↓
(D) Melat Kiros
(R) Christy Peterson
95%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) K. Dennison
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Dwayne Romero60%↓
40%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
80%
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
53%↓
48%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Jason Clark
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) A. Capobianco
90%
2%
(D) Manny Rutinel
(R) Gabe Evans*
55%↑
45%↓
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
Earlier this week we took a look at the bizarre string of late-entry and replacement candidates that Republicans have fielded in a number of key State House races. In order to gain control of the State House, Republicans need to win at least 5 seats this fall — without losing any incumbent legislators — which is a mountain that may be too tall for the GOP to climb in 2014.
As a Colorado Pols analysis of fundraising results in key House districts shows, Democrats are raising significantly more money in competitive House districts compared to their Republican counterparts. We took a look at 12 of the top House districts (you can argue that your list of top races would look a little different, but you get the point), and through July 1, 2014, Democrats had raised more than $500,000, while Republican candidates combined for just a tad more than $100,000.
While so-called "soft money" from third party groups, PACs, and other special interests will certainly get involved in many of these House races, the disparity in fundraising is quite stunning. Take a look at the chart below — there is not a single Republican candidate who has raised even close to the totals compiled by their Democratic counterparts.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments