2013’s Top Ten #4: Democrats Don’t Overreact to “Overreach”

Earlier this week we discussed the "Lie of the Year" in Colorado politics, the persistent nonsense that Democrats were out to "take your guns" in 2013. That narrative continued into the September recall elections, the result of which saw two Democratic Senators ousted (though two other recall attempts failed to reach the ballot altogether). Following the Sept. recall results, we saw plenty of lazy analysis blaming Democratic "overreach" in the 2013 legislative session — analysis that had nothing to do with the reality of the situation.

Even Dawson doesn't cry this much.

Even Dawson doesn’t cry this much

Republicans were using the term "overreach" long before the recall elections, both during and after the legislative session in an effort to spin what was a successful session for Democrats. Following miserable losses at the polls in 2012, the GOP once again faced a legislative session as the minority party in both chambers, and the only play in their playbook was to be obstructionist. When that failed to work, Republicans turned to saying that Democrats were "overreaching" in doing their job as legislators. What really happened is a perfect example of why Democrats have continued to win elections in Colorado in the last decade: they went to work on the issues they were elected to tackle. Or as Democratic Rep. Dan Pabon told the Denver Post in late April:

Overreaching? No. I think we've been listening to the people of Colorado and they've told us, 'We put you in charge and we want you to get something done.'

This is a lesson that Republicans have not been able to grasp for more than a decade in Colorado, and it is the fundamental reason why they lost control of the legislature back in 2004: Colorado voters want their elected officials to lead and to get things done, and Democrats have figured that out. As we wrote back in May, when the GOP "overreach" spin was in full tilt:

Republicans call this "overreaching," and take it as a personal affront. But it's not about them, and it never was. It's about Democrats understanding that Colorado voters want them to lead; voters gave McNulty and the GOP a narrow majority in the House in 2010, and they promptly yanked it back from them two years later when it became clear that Republicans still have no intention of actually legislating.

Voters are tired of Republicans who can't figure out if they should still hate gay people. They're sick of Republicans who compare abortion to the Holocaust while everyone else is worried about schools and the economy. They're fed up with Republicans who persist with their ridiculous "Personhood" policy ideas that keep…getting…rejected…again…and again. "Personhood" isn't even about the issue anymore — it's a symbol of Republicans refusing to listen to even the most loudly shouted opinions of voters…

…when you add up the number of constituents that Democrats in the legislature have been elected to represent, you get an average of 1.2 million more constituents than Republicans can claim to represent (note that this number is not 1.2 individual Coloradans, because overlapping Senate and House districts mean that some people will be represented by both parties).

So the next time you hear a Republican or a political pundit griping that Democrats have "overreached" in the 2013 legislative session, ignore the hyperbole and look at the reality of Colorado's recent electoral history. Democrats have represented, on average, 1.2 million more constituents in the past decade than have Republicans. You could call that a mandate. We'll just call it "obvious." Colorado voters have consistently put Democrats in charge in the legislature by wide margins, and they expect them to do their jobs.

They expect them to represent the majority of Coloradans.

When Senate President John Morse was recalled in September, there was some chatter that Democrats might choose someone other than Senate Majority Leader Morgan Carroll as their next President in order to show voters that they were going to go a more conservative route with their leadership. That chatter was mostly coming from the right, because choosing anyone but Carroll would have been a terrible decision by Democrats — and they knew it. That's why the caucus voted unanimously to select Carroll as Senate President.

Democrats didn't "overreach" in 2013. They passed significant legislation to increase jobs in Colorado, and they passed legislation in increase renewable energy requirements. Yes, they also passed controversial gun safety legislation — but Coloradans largely agreed with those decisions. As a Quinnipiac University poll showed, Democrats lost the messaging battle on gun legislation, but the public actually approved of the specific legislative changes.

While Democrats certainly have some ground to make up on the narrative front in 2014, they have been right to avoid falling into the "overreach" trap set by Republicans that would cause them to pull back from the core leadership and legislative decisions that voters want to see from them. That Democrats didn't overreact when accused of an "overreach" bodes well for their chances at holding their majority through 2014.


7 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. BlueCat says:

    Once again, Modster, note this is part of a lie of the year in Colorado politics list. So If you prefer a specific Colorado Dem originating lie please explain why it should rank high on the list with back up sourcing.  No snark, I'd be very interested in your response.

    • Moderatus says:

      I've decided to let you believe whatever you want. In November, after the elections, I will cite this post though. A lot.

      • DaftPunk says:

        Good thing.  We can't be telling people what to think, what with all our freedom and liberty and all.

      • BlueCat says:

        You'll cite that I asked you for your opinion of what should have made the list of lies in Colorado politics and you did a hasty "look over there" to avoid providing anything at all? Be my guest. Please note nothing in my post made any reference to any election results. It was just a simple invitation which you declined and I can only assume it's because you've got nothing.

  2. dwyer says:

    Denver Post' Lyn Bartels has a blog about the Senate Democrats: http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2014/01/02/colorado-senate-democrats-guns/104103/

    It is informative reading. I recommend it.

    There is a difference, IMHO, between fact and talking points.  The Democrats "overreach" has been a talking point of the Republicans for months.  It figured in the recall elections publicity.  It was even discussed on "Colorado Inside Out' as a given.  

    I agree with CP that the Democrats should not retreat.  I also agree with those who say that the dems have to get better at getting their message out.  The 

    question is how do they do that?  I don't know.

  3. Meiner49er says:

    On getting the message out, Dwyer, I think the one thing we can conclude is that Dems need more knocks on doors than they do spots on TVs (or phone calls, for that matter).  IF the premise of this diary is correct, the message is out there, the voters just don't act on it.  It seems the voters just expect the elected reps to deliver without their help.  The reps did that in the spring, but then the voters weren't there to back them in the fall. TV ads will not drive people to the polls. People with cars (or shoes) are needed to do that. That's what's been keeping Larimer (barely) Blue since 2006, and it's going to take a lot more of that in 2014.

  4. dwyer says:



    I am rereading Blue Print which is the Adam Schrader book on the dems won in 2004.   I think your analysis is important, but there were other factors too, as I recall.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.