U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 21, 2007 03:20 AM UTC

Phase Line Responds, But Doesn't Help

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

It hasn’t been a good couple of days for Republican Secretary of State Mike Coffman, and things aren’t getting much better after the Rocky Mountain News interviewed Phase Line Strategies President Sean Tonner:

The president of a political consulting firm said today there’s no connection between his involvement in Secretary of State Mike Coffman’s congressional race, and Coffman’s favorable decision for one of his clients, a voting machine manufacturer.

Sean Tonner, the president of Phase Line Strategies, said Premier Election Solutions hired his firm in August.

“When Premier came to us, everybody thought Tom Tancredo was going to run in 2010,” Tonner said.

Congressman Tancredo, a Littleton Republican, announced in October he wouldn’t seek another term. That’s when Coffman announced he would seek the GOP nomination in the 6th Congressional District.

That may be “officially” true, but that excuse doesn’t hold a drop of water. Tom Wiens, Ted Harvey and plenty of other Republicans had long expected Tancredo to depart, and Coffman surely was looking at this race long before Tancredo’s “official” announcement. As we discussed here back in January, it was an open secret for months that Tancredo was unlikely to run for re-election.

But wait, there’s more…

Tonner is serving as Coffman’s pro bono campaign spokesman, but he said his company has not been hired to work on the campaign. Tonner said Coffman misspoke when he said he had hired Phase Line.

“Mike and I go back over 10 years. We were both Gulf War veterans. I would charge any hill for him,” Tonner said.

“There’s nothing nefarious here.”

Tonner has served as Coffman’s spokesperson, and he officially announced Coffman’s intentions to run on the same day that Tancredo said he would not run again. Clearly this was being discussed long before Tancredo “officially” bowed out of the race.

We also find it a bit curious that Tonner would go out of his way to point out that Coffman hasn’t “officially” hired Phaseline to run his campaign. “Tonner said Coffman misspoke when he said he had hired Phase Line.” Seriously? Coffman accidentally said that he hired a consultant that he hadn’t actually hired? Come on now – you’ve got to come up with something better than that.

The truth, in fact, will be tough to hide. By all indications Coffman HAS hired Phase Line and said it himself. If Tonner is telling the truth, he should still show up on the report as an in-kind contributor. If Tonner isn’t telling the truth, then somebody is going to have to be cooking some serious books in the next couple of weeks. The mid-January FEC report will be very interesting.

Interestingly enough, the News also reports that Phase Line has already lost one client because of this:

Premier on Wednesday terminated its contract with Phase Line after questioning from the Rocky Mountain News.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Phase Line Responds, But Doesn’t Help

  1. You’re a smart guy.  Tell me why it matters whether Tancredo is going to run when the question is whether Coffman was represented by the same people who represent a company he was supposed to certify or decertify.

    Maybe my own way of thinking about conflict of interest is overly simplistic, but I don’t see how Tancredo has a damned thing to do with it.

    Do you think that, God forbid, Phase Line is answering a different question than the one that was asked?

  2. Do you think the approved Coffman machines come with extra votes for Coffman pre-programmed?  A nice bonus to be sure.

    Thanks for the approval Mike!

    He should have scrapped them all if that is what his board suggested.  But Mike is in a no win situation here.  If he approves them all – he gets it from the court and all the people who know these machines have serious flaws.

    If he scraps them all – every county clerk and budget director will be ticked for costing the taxpayers so much money.

    But he chose the worst of all options.  He nixed the machines that were bad while only certifying the ones his buddy Phase Line suggested he approve.

    What kind of bonus did they give Phase Line as a parting gift?

    Extra votes for Coffman may be in order.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

120 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols