Colorado is forced to break its contracts? The state that is now the 10th richest in the country faces such a financial "crisis" that it cannot pay its bills? The State of Colorado is forced to break its Colorado PERA public pension contracts while it has the 10th highest GDP per capita? (Colorado is 15th richest by median household income, 9th by per capita income.) Of course, as we have seen, the State of Colorado is selective about the contracts "that must be broken," debts owed to corporations are of course off the table. Wealthy bond holder? No worries for you. Defenseless Colorado PERA peasant? You'll do nicely!
Perhaps the Colorado Legislature must continue to break Colorado PERA pension contracts in order that it be able to supplement the $700 million that it has already pumped into paying off local government legacy pension debt that IS NOT the contractual obligation of the State of Colorado. It must break its own contracts to pay for the contractual obligations of other governments. Perhaps the Colorado Legislature must continue breaking its pension contracts in order that it retain the ability to provide $100 million discretionary grants of property tax relief, or as Senator Morse proposed earlier this year, enshrining another quarter billion dollar tax cut into the Colorado Constitution under TABOR.
10 Richest U.S. States in 2013 (GDP per capita) – Colorado #10 ($51,940)
See the Top Ten Richest States (by GDP) here:
See all states by median household income and per capita income here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_income
Colorado PERA active and retired members, fight for your rights! Contribute to the cause at saveperacola.com. Friend Save Pera Cola on Facebook!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Even More Felony Charges For Colorado Coup Plotters Jenna Ellis, John Eastman
BY: Colorado Pols
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: davebarnes
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
BY: unnamed
IN: Even More Felony Charges For Colorado Coup Plotters Jenna Ellis, John Eastman
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Who Wins What in June? (Vote #1)
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Hey Algernon, Social Security's long-term COLA of 4.13% sure beats PERA's zero to 2% …
Illinois Teachers' COLA Targeted To Mask Pension Fraud
http://www.news-gazette.com/opinion/guest-commentary/2013-04-28/guest-commentary-teachers-cola-targeted-mask-pension-fraud.html
"Most states and savvy pension plans use COLAs modeled on Social Security, as informed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, for 30 years the Illinois Legislature has been misleading its teachers and public employees by employing a low COLA rate of 3 percent when the federal Social Security rate has been an average of 30 percent higher at 4.13 percent. The Illinois Legislature has technically been keeping the difference between the higher inflation rates and the Illinois 3 percent COLA."
Illinois State Senator Kwame Raoul is an engaging public figure, but he needs to get it right on public pension rights in Illinois. Illinois' Governor recently decided to withhold the salaries of Illinois state lawmakers until they arrive at a solution to Illinois' historical pension underfunding problem (i.e., he wants them to propose breach of pension contracts.)
Kwame Raoul thinks that it is unconstitutional for the state to withhold state legislator's earned compensation. So, why does Kwame believe that it is constitutionally permissible for the state to withhold the earned, deferred compensation of retired public sector workers by perhaps seizing their contracted pension COLA benefits?
Illinois Pension Conference Committee Chair Kwame Raoul on state legislator's contractual rights to earned compensation:
"I think … there are just plain old labor law issues, employment law issues, because we’re employed, in essence, by contract. And it’s an assigned salary, so if you don’t pay somebody, you’re obviously in violation of the law, you know?"
Kwame Raoul on Illinois public pension retiree COLA benefits:
"It’s identical in that aspect (the plan’s primary component is changing a 3 percent compounded cost-of-living increase to a percent equal to half of the inflation rate)."
"One of the attractive aspects is the notion of inflation protection for the employees and retirees. And that’s attractive both from just a moral standpoint and from making an argument of constitutionality in terms of having something offered."
(My comment: Kwame, breaking a contractual public pension COLA obligation is not at all "attractive," nor is it "constitutional." Taking something from a person is not giving something to a person. Illinois pensions have "automatic," contracted COLA benefits. Public pension COLA benefits are deferred compensation, presently earned. It looks like Kwame wants to see the State of Illinois "inflate away" its pension debt, by taking money from the elderly.)
http://www.chicagolawbulletin.com/Articles/2013/07/30/dispatch-7-30-2013.aspx
Support contractual public pension rights in the USA. Contribute at saaveperacola.com. Friend Save Pera Cola on Facebook!