President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

52%↑

48%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

60%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 27, 2007 06:10 PM UTC

As Romanoff is to Sudan...

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

So the GOP is to Iran, at least when it comes to divestiture of state money, as the Colorado Springs Gazette reports:

Now playing at the Capitol: “Divestiture Wars.”

Two days after House Speaker Andrew Romanoff announced that he would lobby China to stop funding businesses and weapons in the Sudan, two Republican legislators announced plans to try to sell off any state pension fund investments in Iran.

Sen. Josh Penry of Fruita and Rep. Frank McNulty of Highlands Ranch notified the Public Employees Retirement Association of their plans in a letter last month. On Thursday, they said they will introduce a bill next session that would require the divestiture.

“Colorado’s public pensions have no business doing business in Iran,” Penry said in a news release. “As long as Iranian IEDs are killing American soldiers and as long as (President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad makes nuclear proliferation and the elimination of Israel a centerpiece of his foreign policy, PERA should park its investments somewhere else.”

It’s our understanding that American investment in Iran was blocked by federal law in 1995 (by President Clinton), so this seems kind of pointless. But whatever helps them glom a piece of Andrew Romanoff’s humanitarian shine, right?

Comments

14 thoughts on “As Romanoff is to Sudan…

  1. Actually PERA could divest from foreign companies which have American subsidiaries or even those listed on the NYSE through ADRs, no?

      1. An American Depository Receipt (ADR) is a certificate that represents shares in a foreign company stock that is traded on an exchange in the US.  I guess that way you technically don’t own the foreign stock, but seems like a small distinction to me because it’s still backed by the foreign companys’ stock.  Anyway, after yesterday I don’t want to think about the stock market for a few more days…

        1. And technically you do own foriegn stock.  You just own it through a conduit.

          The comment just didn’t make any sene to me.

          PERA has a target allocation of 15% international equity that can be bought directly or indirectly (ADRs).

          I was just trying to clarify MOR’s point.

          If the point is to block the purchase of all chinese equity because of Darfur or companies that do business with sudan or something else.

          1. I guess I didn’t understand it either.  I think he was saying if you own ADR’s you don’t technically own the stock, and that would satisfy being divested in any company that did bus with Sudan, China, whatever.  Honestly I don’t know if that is right or wrong, but if you say you technically still own the stock then it dosen’t make a difference then.

  2. American businesses and individuals are restricted from doing business with various embargoed countries, including Iran and Sudan.  However, those restrictions do not apply to foreign-based companies which, as a previous commenter noted, may be traded in American markets via ADRs or whatnot.

    1. Problem is most international companies in the world do business with Iran.  If you couldn’t do business with a company that did business with Iran, you basically couldn’t invest in foriegn stocks.

      Far fewer international companies do business with Sudan so it wouldn’t be as onerous.

      The point I think Andrew is trying to make is that China has incredible influence over Sudan and they have a moral responsibility to use that influence to prevent genocide if they want to be taken seriously as a responsible modern nation with a role on the international stage.

      Threatening china is usually a losing game.

  3. But given the federal laws which already prevented most investment in Sudan, and noting the exception for these ADR investments (I’m no broker, so bear with me), how much did PERA actually have to divest?

    If it was nothing or only a token amount, his measure seems as symbolic and the GOP proposal on Iranian investments. Maybe he’ll do more good talking to the Chinese?

    1. Has Romanoff or McNulty or Penry divested?  Or even asked their constituents to divest?  Or are they just waiting for these profitable stocks to come on the market?  Funny that the only entity that will be banned from owning these stocks is PERA.

    1. Playing the divestment game is like playing “Six Degrees of Separation”. You’d have to ban every single stock from public trading.  US has already banned companies from direct business dealings with Sudan and Iran.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

59 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!