DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
Check out this story by Denver Politics:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: Marla Robbinson
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I have looked into this a matter a little since it first came up. One problem is that the city does not have a definition of what is a “resident” for the purposes of running for office. And the municipal elections are run by city law and not state laws.
If he was running for a legislative seat, it would be an open and shut case because state specifically states one has to be registered in the district for a certain time to be eligible to run for a seat there.
The city laws have no such requirement. They only require one to be a “resident” but do not define how that residency is determined.
If he wins the election, this matter should and probably will, go to court and a judge will have to make a determination. My understanding is that Lopez has multiple addresses and has effectively lived off-and-on at all of them so can claim any of them as his residence under the current lack of specific definition. I suspect lack of legal definition will work in his favor in court.
In any event, City Council needs to pass a ordinance defining residency for the purposes of elections.